Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
> On 29/09/09 10:54, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
>> So far, the formal votes I count are +1 (Simone), +0 (me), so it is at
>> this time formally accepted.
>
> Andrea and Christian, do your concerns about unit test coverage in
> gt-swing constitute a vote of -1 on prom
GridCoverage2D.evaluate methods to work directly with grid coordinates
--
Key: GEOT-2740
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2740
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Improve
Thanks Jody.
I think (hope) the NPE in JMapFrame was a fleeting problem caused by
me working on fixing the conversation between map pane and status bar.
Another user (IceDice / Nenad) reports that it is ok now.
Michael
-
Hi Landon,
You might find it hard to avoid JAI if you use the coverage module.
PlanarImage and other JAI bits are common in a lot of the classes.
But I **think** GridGeometry2D and its friends are JAI-free.
Michael
--
Co
2009/9/29 Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Michael, I think the proposal to move gt-swing to supported has been
> accepted, with reservations. While we are concerned about unit test
> coverage, this is recognised as a hard problem for GUI elements.
Thanks Ben - much appreciated.
Apologies to all for s
On 29/09/09 10:54, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> So far, the formal votes I count are +1 (Simone), +0 (me), so it is at
> this time formally accepted.
Andrea and Christian, do your concerns about unit test coverage in
gt-swing constitute a vote of -1 on promotion to supported? Or do you
vote +1/+0
On 29/09/09 10:34, Michael Bedward wrote:
> This is a bit discouraging.
Michael, I think the proposal to move gt-swing to supported has been
accepted, with reservations. While we are concerned about unit test
coverage, this is recognised as a hard problem for GUI elements.
So far, the formal vo
Hello all,
This is a bit discouraging.
As Jody said, the remit was for a minimal module to support the
GeoTools examples and cater for the modest but common requests on the
user list for basic display.
Perhaps another possibility is to just put it in demo ? Not ideal,
but better than providing
On 26/09/09 20:29, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
>> I propose that we hold a FOSS4G code sprint to progress ISO 19107 / GML
>> 3D geometry collaboration (OSGeom) between GeoTools/GeoServer and
>> deegree communities. See here for more:
>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2009
+0 on graduation, with the lack of unit test coverage being the main
problem. The "+" comes from the two unit tests running while not
headless. Note that, because these tests exit early when headless, we
have 0% test coverage on Hudson, where we use -Djava.awt.headless=true.
Swing is a pain to
Hi Christian.
When we proposed this module (as a replacement for gt-widgets-swing)
the idea was to take it offline to unsupported for a few months and
put back only what we ended up using. My understanding was that were
were going to focus on examples rather then test coverage and we have
I've been poking around the Javadoc in Geotools to see what code I
might be able to use to improve JUMP's support for displaying
georeferrenced raster images. I've been looking at the
org.geotools.coverage.grid package mostly.
It seems like the coverage model may be a little more heavy than I
need
Cannot read metadata when not schema owner
--
Key: GEOT-2739
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2739
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: data oraclespatial
Environme
Hi Alessio,
I created some jira issues and attached the patches to them
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2738
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3549
Made comments on the issues.
-Justin
Alessio Fabiani wrote:
> I'm sending you the patches of the EMF work until now ... consider that
> t
WCS 1.0 EMF model
-
Key: GEOT-2738
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2738
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Justin Deoliveira
Assignee: Alessio Fabiani
Attachments: GeoTools
I am with Andrea concerning the test coverage.
I am always trying hard to get a good code coverage, investing sometimes
more time in creating the the test cases than in the module itself.
Additionally, since I developed a Swing applet for showing maps and
modifying geometries, I know Swing i
WFS does not support feature types without geometry columns.
Key: GEOT-2737
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2737
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: d
On 29/09/2009, at 12:48 AM, Matthias Lendholt wrote:
>> I see then I am confused ... let me check - adding a test method to
>> ParserTest with the following "naked" configuration.
>
> Sorry! My fault. It was a misunderstanding on my side. I mixed up
> the Encoder in the background creating the
Jody Garnett schrieb:
>
>> No - that's not true :-)
>
> I see then I am confused ... let me check - adding a test method to
> ParserTest with the following "naked" configuration.
Sorry! My fault. It was a misunderstanding on my side. I mixed up the
Encoder in the background creating the WPS re
Ready to graduate to extension, there are a series of code examples on
the website making use of the public api:
- http://geotools.org/quickstart.html
- http://geotools.org/examples/index.html
And some reference pages in the wiki:
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTDOC/Swing
The code cover
Moved to unsupported
On 25/09/2009, at 11:35 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> I would like to just drop the usage of the shapefile renderer
> and move it to unsupported land before we go RC.
The feedback from the udig-devel list is that we would like to ad the
bitmap look aside trick to streaming rend
A second review of netbeans quickstart using maven.
This time I was able to time the process; with all the installers in
hand it took 33 minuets. The netbeans install took 10 mins just on its
own. A good reminder to me that maven is only easy after you have used
it once and it has had a cha
22 matches
Mail list logo
