[Geotools-devel] Strange problems with png8 image format and transparency=true requests

Hi, First : Sorry for cross-posting, but I have no idea where the problem occurs and geoserver is based on geotools. After the fix of bug UDIG-1650 (transparency and image format png8) the labels of rendered features are ugly. What I've done: - checked

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Strange problems with png8 image format and transparency=true requests

Frank Gasdorf ha scritto: > Hi, > > First : Sorry for cross-posting, but I have no idea where the problem > occurs and geoserver is based on geotools. > > After the fix of bug UDIG-1650 > (transparency and image > format png8) the labels of rendered

[Geotools-devel] [Fwd: [jira] Updated: (GEOT-2978) NPE in org.geotools.data.wps.WPSProcess if WPS Process has no input parameters]

Hi developers, I attached a patch to this bug report and it would be great if someone could apply it and not just defer this issue again ;-) Thanks! Matthias Original-Nachricht Betreff: [jira] Updated: (GEOT-2978) NPE in org.geotools.data.wps.WPSProcess if WPS Process has no

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3090) some can't be found by Processors.createProcess

some can't be found by Processors.createProcess --- Key: GEOT-3090 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3090 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 2.6.0 Reporter:

[Geotools-devel] Number of registered users and developers on the forum

Hi, Is there a way I could know how many active users and developers are registered to this forum. Will appreciate for the response. Cheers Ali. -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Number-of-registered-users-and-developers-on-the-forum-tp5074430p5074430.html

[Geotools-devel] Allowing web applications to undeploy without perm gen leaks, a first cut

Hi, so as you I've been working on allowing web applications to properly undeploy without leaking permanent generation memory. I have a first cut that solves all the problems I've been able to find so far. Unfortunately it still does not allow GS to actually undeploy cleanly, but it's a step in

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3091) LeanFeatureCollection implementation

LeanFeatureCollection implementation Key: GEOT-3091 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3091 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: New Feature Environment: Windows 7, JDK 6, Eclipse, Netbeans

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3092) SimpleFeatureTypeBuilder with more than geometry attribute

SimpleFeatureTypeBuilder with more than geometry attribute -- Key: GEOT-3092 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3092 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug Components: core

Re: [Geotools-devel] Allowing web applications to undeploy without perm gen leaks, a first cut

Wow that is a tangle! I am still keen to have a GeoTools.cleanup() method; and perhaps a GeoTools.registerCleanup( Cleanup ) so that our "dependencies" can register themselves to be cleaned. Boy I am stick of Factory SPI :-( Please commit on trunk as you say; we are fixing mistakes/sanity. Jo

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3093) can't support Chinese fields in shpfiles

can't support Chinese fields in shpfiles Key: GEOT-3093 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3093 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Bug Components: data shapefile Affects Versions: 2.6.

Re: [Geotools-devel] Unit of measure support is in

On 05/17/2010 11:19 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > I've finally been able to commit the unit of measure support > Milton developed on GeoTools trunk (that makes it available > for GeoServer trunk too, of course). > > If you're interested in the topic please test :-) > > Oh, if you need a reminder o

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 2.6.4 Released

The GeoTools 2.6.4 release is now available for download: geotools-2.6.4-bin.zip geotools-2.6.4-project.zip geotools-2.6.4-doc.zip geotools-2.6.4-welcome.zip geotools-2.6.4-guide.zip Release Notes This is a bug fix release made in conjunction with uDig 1.2-RC3. This release adds support for Oracl

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 2.6.4 Released

On 20 May 2010 12:18, Jody Garnett wrote: > The GeoTools 2.6.4 release is now available for download: > Hi Jody, Very nice ! Michael -- ___ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotoo

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Query - org.geotools.referencing.factory.AbstractAuthorityFactory

Hi all, I know most you guys are busy with the release of the new version of Geotools, but I was wondering if someone can have a quick look at my issue? Thank you for your time, Regards, Derrick -Original Message- From: derrick.w...@csiro.au [mailto:derrick.w...@csiro.au] Sent: Mo

[Geotools-devel] symbology encoding: recode function

Hi folks, I'm looking at getting the Recode function working but, as usual, the symbology encoding specs are quiet about some of the fiddly bits... It's basically just a table lookup. Questions: What do we return if the lookup value isn't found ? Should text lookups be case-insensitive ? (I woul

Re: [Geotools-devel] symbology encoding: recode function

There is something you may of missed in the spec... See where it returns se:Function? That mandates that a "fallback" value is provided; I think that the fallback value may be used in cases where lookup value is not found. I agree that text lookups should be case-insensitvie. You may also enjo

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools 2.6.4 Released

You will note that I: - exported the user guide wiki - exported our website docs as In generating our website docs I was basically stuck with creating the complete website. I would like us to end the experiment of Sphinx and adopt it in a more orderly manner; but I am a bit at a loss of *how* t

Re: [Geotools-devel] Unit of measure support is in

David Winslow ha scritto: > This is a really cool feature, so I'm pretty excited about ripping it > off for GeoServer CSS :) However, when I looked at the spec I was > really surprised to see that UOM is an attribute of the symbolizer > instead of the parameter (a Symbolizer isn't a measureme

Re: [Geotools-devel] Unit of measure support is in

>> By my reading, the UomRescalingVisitor doesn't handle this option. (And >> it seems like fully supporting this via a visitor will be a problem; >> with weird enough filter functions in a parameter the "px" suffix might >> appear and disappear for different features in the same symbolizer.)

Re: [Geotools-devel] symbology encoding: recode function

Hi Jody, > There is something you may of missed in the spec... > > See where it returns se:Function?  That mandates that a "fallback" value is > provided; I > think that the fallback value may be used in cases where lookup value is not > found. Unfortunately I don't think that's right. For func

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] Unit of measure support is in

Jody Garnett ha scritto: >>> By my reading, the UomRescalingVisitor doesn't handle this >>> option. (And it seems like fully supporting this via a visitor >>> will be a problem; with weird enough filter functions in a >>> parameter the "px" suffix might appear and disappear for >>> different featu