Hi Andrea,
+1 for the proposal.
I agree with Gabriel's point about existing possibly being confusing
(it put me on the wrong track before I read the detail) but perhaps
it's best to go with that usage if it's in the spec and rely on the
docs to clear up any ambiguity.
Michael
I have added my +1 to the page.
The only thing I think could be added to this proposal is to not allow null to
be passed in when the request has been made to use an existing feature ID?
(Presuming of course that wfs has the same meaning and error condition).
Thanks for the hard word andrea.
I am talking about improvements to the referencing module for scaling
better under multithreaded load.
Simone.
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Founder - Software Engineer
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
phone: +39
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
I have added my +1 to the page.
The only thing I think could be added to this proposal is to not
allow null to be passed in when the request has been made to use an
existing feature ID? (Presuming of course that wfs has the same
meaning and error condition).
Not
Simone Giannecchini ha scritto:
I am talking about improvements to the referencing module for scaling
better under multithreaded load.
That is, this proposal, right?
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Improve+CRSAuthority+Concurrency+Caching+and+Connection+Use
Afaik the classes have
On 30/05/2010, at 10:31 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
I have added my +1 to the page.
The only thing I think could be added to this proposal is to not
allow null to be passed in when the request has been made to use an
existing feature ID? (Presuming of course that wfs has
Yeah the contract for that one finished up before the changes were accepted. It
was down to one test failure.
Mostly it was QA and optimisations work.
Jody
On 30/05/2010, at 10:34 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
Simone Giannecchini ha scritto:
I am talking about improvements to the referencing module
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
As per discussion I did up a proposal with the plan.
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Sphinx+Documentation+Process
+1 for me.
This practice works very well in GeoServer. GeoTools is a larger and
longer established project, and in my opinion, usually
+1. I think this is necessary for effective use of WFS-T by
organisations who use primary keys with business meaning. Database
design best-practice is to avoid having primary keys with business
meaning, but as Andrea has noted, this practice is sufficiently
widespread to be supported by the
