Nothing wrong with HashMap - not a weakness - its behaviour is
implicit in the hashing algorithm. Its simply using the wrong tool for
a job :-)
The problem with observation is you see what you want to see, Grasshopper :-)
Modern programmers learn about frameworks - old fashioned ones with
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
On 15/06/10 13:27, derrick.w...@csiro.au wrote:
With regards to EPSG: 23038.
The canonical source for EPSG codes is here:
http://epsg-registry.org/
This also lists 23038.
Right, it's also in the EPSG database, I must have mistyped
the code when I searched
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
Can we arrange for maven to yell at us when HashMap is used?
Ben I have been known to use a couple of the other Map
implementations; such as ConcurrentHashMap (and we also have our own
WeakHashMap) - we may need to check if these implementations suffer
the same
On 15/06/10 15:50, Andrea Aime wrote:
Developer depending on hashmap order - chaos
It's not the fault of poor hashmap that developers use it in a number
of places where it's unnecessary if not even harmful.
But the poor developers cannot know if they are getting a HashMap if
they are a
On 15/06/10 16:17, Andrea Aime wrote:
I still see an incompetent developer in action there.
You look at that interface, you get a Map, so you know:
- the API designer decided the iteration order was not important
- the iteration order cannot be trusted
Many other Map implementations have
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
On 15/06/10 16:17, Andrea Aime wrote:
I still see an incompetent developer in action there.
You look at that interface, you get a Map, so you know:
- the API designer decided the iteration order was not important
- the iteration order cannot be trusted
Many
On 15/06/10 16:45, Andrea Aime wrote:
I would not blame Alice for Bob lack of skill (or simple oversight).
She exposed a Map and made no promises on ordering, Bob took it and
promised what he could not deliver.
How does finger pointing between Alice and Bob help Carol? A bit of
defensive
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
On 15/06/10 16:45, Andrea Aime wrote:
I would not blame Alice for Bob lack of skill (or simple oversight).
She exposed a Map and made no promises on ordering, Bob took it and
promised what he could not deliver.
How does finger pointing between Alice and Bob
I think like Andrea, filling an ordered collection from an unordered
one needs an explicit ordering criteria, otherwise it is nonsense.
There is nothing bad about using a HashMap, a set has an exact
definition as we all know from mathematics in school (I hope so :-))
Unfortunately, as we
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/2788/changes
Changes:
[afabiani] - fixing GTDataStore catalog multiple typeNames issue
--
[...truncated 6622 lines...]
INFO: Unable to find crs, continuing with default WGS4 CRS
Jun 15, 2010 10:15:05
Commit went through...
Had some interesting failures in GeoServer where the wrapper featureSource
implementations had an inconsistent CRS between their getSchema() and their
getBounds().
So not a smooth transition; but making me glad to do the work in stages.
Jody
On 15/06/2010, at 3:20 PM,
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/2789/changes
Changes:
[jive] Remove complicated logic from addLayers method; generate default
areaOfInterest when first called based on layer bounds, ask FeatureLayer to
check that bounds crs and schema crs are in agreement - and if
+1 for Andrea and Christian.
--
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/2790/changes
--
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the
+1 (sorry to be late as it was progressing I assumed I'd voted earlier
in the previous mass vote round).
Ian
--
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to
+0, until now I did not use MapContext directly, but a cleanup sounds good
Quoting Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com:
So I have a few votes in - and a few reviews (thanks!)
• Andrea Aime
• +1 Ben Caradoc-Davies
• Christian Mueller
• Ian Turton
• Justin
Hi,
I'm having potential funding to backport and eventually make
some fixes on the UOM work that Milton (and, to a less extent,
yours trunk) worked on on trunk.
The patch that I would backport is this one, and it's 65k:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/attachment/49040/GEOT-2964.patch
Afaik
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
So I have a few votes in - and a few reviews (thanks!)
• Andrea Aime
+1
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
--
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Mª®k mc.pr...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for Andrea and Christian.
+1 from me too - When I learnt about maps and lists I was taught they
do different things and to be clear about which I needed.
Ian
--
Ian Turton
Hi,
just committed support for geography columns on trunk.
The patch was not trivial in that I had to change some
function call in a way that makes the datastore
incompatible with PostGIS 1.1, so no backport just
to be on the safe side (wondering if anyone still
has PostGIS 1.1 deploys around?)
Sorry for the late review. But I am +0 as that is one of the apis I have
not really used in geotools much. So I delegate to the experts on this one.
On 10-06-14 11:20 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
So I have a few votes in - and a few reviews (thanks!)
• Andrea Aime
• +1 Ben
I have to add my +1 as well. We have run up against this before when we
started supporting java 6 and the moral of the story was that it is up
to the downstream developer to ensure that if they are iterating through
a map in a case where order matters then the onus is on them to ensure
they
+1 to good discussion here. Good read for me.
I think I agree with how developers should really know what they are
doing. I bet we all have experienced times where we wish people using
our functions use them properly.
However, I think Ben still has a point in being DEFENSIVE. I agree
with Ben
On 6/15/10 3:56 PM, lim goh wrote:
+1 to good discussion here. Good read for me.
I think I agree with how developers should really know what they are
doing. I bet we all have experienced times where we wish people using
our functions use them properly.
However, I think Ben still has a point
I guess we fell back to the definition of defensive, I don't know a
good replacement word for it, but what I wanted to say is:
1. Using Map as a return type is completely valid, good, should, defensive...
2. Consumer who expects specific implementation detail is wrong, bad,
should not.
3. The
In general I like to keep new features for trunk; however back porting existing
work if needed seems fine - and the UOM work has been out for a bit now and
released to the public already.
The main module effected is of course rendering; so if you are happy with the
risk as the module
Hi Jody,
Sorry to be absent for the last few days. I'm sure you were assuming
+1 from me :)
Thanks again for this great improvement.
Michael
On 15 June 2010 15:20, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com wrote:
So I have a few votes in - and a few reviews (thanks!)
• Andrea Aime
On 16/06/10 03:49, Gabriel Roldan wrote:
So, being certain that most probably I introduced some of this problems
myself by having worked on the app-schema code years ago, I still
strongly argument against anyone that expects a given iteration order
out of a method returning a Map
Gabriel,
Hi Andrea et al,
Thanks for looking at ways to improve the process module !
I'm happy with your comments about both VectorToRaster and RasterToVector.
I would much prefer to have FeatureSource used rather than
FeatureCollection unless that presents big problems for others.
Michael
Ben is right here. The problem is spread over all geotools/geoserver
tests. As I started with geotools/IBM SDK I fixed a lot of tests
having this problem.
At the moment, there are some tests which are not easy to fix for me.
I am not sure if the library should pass back an ordered
Hi Michael:
I am looking over jai-tools, and Jiffle :-) I did not see a project mailing
list so I thought I would pester you on the geotools list. I eventually had to
check out the source code to sort out working examples; thus far I have been
very impressed - and also jealous the performance
Hi Jody,
Thanks for the nice words :-)
There is a mailing list here...
http://groups.google.com/group/jai-tools?pli=1
I should probably make it more obvious on the jai-tools project page.
Michael
On 16 June 2010 13:41, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michael:
I am looking
32 matches
Mail list logo
