Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Migrate ComplexFeature Parsing work off wfs-ng

Adam, are you asking for a new unsupported module? http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/procedures/create.html How much of Gabriel's wfs-ng do you need, or are you proposing to fork it? Gabriel, what are your plans for your fork of wfs-ng? Do you intend to merge it back into github geotool

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-master-jdbc #32

See -- [...truncated 1380 lines...] at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.j

[Geotools-devel] Migrate ComplexFeature Parsing work off wfs-ng

Hi all, I am doing some work to add ComplexFeature parsing and building support to GeoTools. At the moment it's on my own fork of wfs-ng. The decision around me doing this work on this branch was arr

Re: [Geotools-devel] Geotools 8.0 RC3 or 8.0 release

Hi Victor, we should be good on the gwc side. Pegged 2.2.x to 1.3-RC4 and backported the needed fixes to geoserver. I'm waiting on the 2.2.x hudson build right now but it worked just fine on my dev box with an empty mvn repository. Fingers crossed nonetheless. Lets talk tomorrow (today?) Friday i

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Geotools 8.0 release

Victor, see here: GEOT-4204: Intermittent JDBCJoinTest failures https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4204 (An you can see this as SISS-1348 in our internal Jira.) This is only an intermittent failure, it only affects JDBC, and there only the new joining functionality. It has not been our prac

[Geotools-devel] Geotools 8.0 release

The geotools master jdbc job is failing. That would seem like a blocker for release ests in error: testSimpleJoinWithPostFilter(org.geotools.data.oracle.OracleJoinTest): java.lang.RuntimeException: java.sql.SQLException: Closed Resultset: next Is that an error in the set up or a genuine fai

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Board] Asking permission for re-licensing from LGPL to Apache

On Friday, 27 July 2012 at 8:46 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote: > The GeoTools PSC is still the duely constituted representative of the project > as far as I know. > Indeed the GeoTools PSC is functioning well in this capacity. As "GeoTools Project Officer" please feel free to contact me if you woul

Re: [Geotools-devel] About [Board] Asking permission for re-licensing from LGPL to Apache

> I get the feeling that there are bigger implications than just a license > change which have not been publicly verbalised, and I think it would > help to get these out in the open. > * In particular, it seems that core to this discussion is the > relationship between OSGeo and LocationTech, al

Re: [Geotools-devel] About [Board] Asking permission for re-licensing from LGPL to Apache

Even pointed me at further discussion about this issue: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=geotools-administration&max_rows=25&style=nested&viewmonth=201207 For people outside of the geotools community, such as the board, I think it would be helpful to explain why some PSC me

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Board] Asking permission for re-licensing from LGPL to Apache

Le 27/07/12 01:31, Martin Desruisseaux a écrit : > We were unsure about this interpretation, and thus asked to the board. > We have always been told in the past to ask to the GeoTools PMC. Just for clarification: I'm really not pointing to anyone since we have been told that by many different pe

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Board] Asking permission for re-licensing from LGPL to Apache

Hello Frank Le 27/07/12 00:46, Frank Warmerdam a écrit : > "The Foundation hereby grants the Contributor the non­exclusive, > perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty­free, > license to use, copy, prepare derivative works of, publicly display or > perform, and distribute the Submission." > > I *

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Board] Asking permission for re-licensing from LGPL to Apache

Hello Cameron Le 27/07/12 00:37, Cameron Shorter a écrit : I'd be interested to hear who voted from the Geotools PSC, and their reasons for voting as they did. Are you able to point at the IRC logs, or email conversation? Alternatively invite the people with concerns to air their opinions. Th

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Board] Asking permission for re-licensing from LGPL to Apache

Martin, (talking as a non-board member), I'd be interested to hear who voted from the Geotools PSC, and their reasons for voting as they did. Are you able to point at the IRC logs, or email conversation? Alternatively invite the people with concerns to air their opinions. I think this questio

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Board] Asking permission for re-licensing from LGPL to Apache

Board As suggested, we posted our request on the GeoTools mailing list (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=29572383). The GeoTools PMC had a meeting Monday, which resulted in 2 "inclined yes" votes, 2 "inclined no" votes and one proposal to re-license GeoTools too. We do no

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-master-jdbc #31

See -- [...truncated 1379 lines...] at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:104) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Met

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Hudson build is back to normal : geotools-8.x-jdbc #12

See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclu