For the code in question we are responsible as a subcommittee to get
things done. Any significant change beyond day to day operation we
send to the board for approval ( like any other committee ).
I am sorry I was not able to make Monday's meeting but we did get
discussion going.
--
Jody Garnett
Jody
My previous email was a question to the OSGeo board about the
interpretation of a particular paragraph of the copyright agreement, as
pointed by Frank. We understand that GeoTools has its own schedule,
consequently we didn't asked any decision about the 5% of "core" code
that we didn't wr
Le 27/07/12 16:24, Jody Garnett a écrit :
> Currently i am spending more of my volunteer time writing email with
> you then helping you at the moment.
Just for clarification: this phrase may give the impression that we are
having extensive private email exchange, which is not the case.
Marti
Martin the geotools meeting did not result in a vote; or any course of
action.
We have a decision making process to follow, which starts with assembling
enough information to know what we are talking about.
I am afraid I was otherwise booked with the OSGeo incubation meeting and
could not attend
Martin the geotools project which you approached earlier has not had a
chance to look into your request yet with any degree of care. As an
example we had not gotten around to checking the code contribution
agreement yet.
The community process takes time, I was unable to attend the meeting (
due to
Hey Victor,
It looks like version 8.0 does not exist in jira, although "8.0.0" did. I
have changed that back to "8.0". We also need to transfer all resolved
issues that have a fixVersion of "8.0-RC3" to the "8.0" fixVersion. I have
done this.
Generally you need to run the jira job before you run
Seems sensible in general that Complex Feature parsing and building would
be independent on wfs datastore. People might want to use it standalone,
just reading in some gml files. Then wfs-ng should just call that module,
no?
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
ben.caradoc-dav...@
Hello all
I would like to know the board position on the interpretation below. Are
contributors who granted their copyright to OSGeo allowed to re-license
their own work to an other open source license? We have no problem in
waiting for the conclusion of OSGeo debate about the work done by othe
Hi I encounter the following error when attempting to deploy GT:
What i put in:
Branch 8.x
Rev : 87c5c25d511001e926a6ef0ccd98e55f8584cb9a
Version: 8.0
Cite log
version = 2.3-SNAPSHOT
git revision = 9b131ef52424a0ef51effd656547079ebea579a5
git branch = 9b131ef52424a0ef51effd656547079ebea579
Hi Ben and others,
Thanks for your response.
I already forked wfs-ng (from Gabriel's) but the problem I'm having is that
there are errors in it which prevent it compiling.
I don't really know how much (if any) of wfs-ng I need because I don't actually
know how it differs from trunk - I just pu
10 matches
Mail list logo
