[Geotools-devel] [jira] (GEOT-4499) Exception when using Estimated Extent and Virtual Tables in PostGIS

2013-06-26 Thread Kevin Smith (JIRA)
Kevin Smi

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pull Request Policy

2013-06-26 Thread Christian Mueller
Hi Chris I am completely with you, but I think we should discuss this in a new thread. Cheers Christian 2013/6/26 Chris Holmes > Ah right, apologies Christian, I'd completely forgotten, I guess because > you've actually been doing great work with it for so long, and you've > expanded your con

[Geotools-devel] a few more headers to fix

2013-06-26 Thread Jody Garnett
Once again from off-list: geotools-9.3\modules\library\main\src\main\java\org\geotools\util\EnumerationConverterFactory.java geotools-9.3\modules\unsupported\process-raster\src\main\java\org\geotools\process\raster\BaseCoverageAlgebraProcess.java geotools-9.3\modules\unsupported\process-raster\sr

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pull Request Policy

2013-06-26 Thread Chris Holmes
Ah right, apologies Christian, I'd completely forgotten, I guess because you've actually been doing great work with it for so long, and you've expanded your contributions in to many other areas. Oh yeah, and merging the file and database image modules would be really great. One preliminary step mi

Re: [Geotools-devel] About PR 217, H2 upgrad

2013-06-26 Thread Brett Walker
You are rightly confused. The original Pull Request is about the epsg-hsql module. Andrea mentioned the jdbc-h2 module. I think this is the start of the confusion. I didn't spot the difference either until you mentioned it. What I said about maintaining backwards compatibility still stands. Br

Re: [Geotools-devel] About PR 217, H2 upgrad

2013-06-26 Thread Andrea Aime
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > A little confused here... are we talking h2 or hsql? The pr doesn't seem > to touch h2 at all unless i am missing something. > Doh, you're right, it's HSQL! > > Regardless i agree that any upgrade requiring a migration like this we >

Re: [Geotools-devel] About PR 217, H2 upgrad

2013-06-26 Thread Justin Deoliveira
A little confused here... are we talking h2 or hsql? The pr doesn't seem to touch h2 at all unless i am missing something. Regardless i agree that any upgrade requiring a migration like this we need to be careful of. I would say keep pegged to a version we know is safe but also try to allow for us

Re: [Geotools-devel] Commit access for Brett Walker

2013-06-26 Thread Christian Mueller
And here comes the third +1 Cheers Christian 2013/6/26 Andrea Aime > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies < > ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote: > >> +1. >> >> I changed the title to attract attention. You need three +1 votes. See >> also: >> http://docs.geotools.org/latest/dev

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pull Request Policy

2013-06-26 Thread Christian Mueller
Hi @Chris. I am the long term maintainer of the DB2 module. See the latestet release notes http://geotoolsnews.blogspot.co.at/2013/06/geotools-93-released.html There is almost no feed back from the community, enhancements are done based on my experience or from requirements sent to me by David Adl

Re: [Geotools-devel] Commit access for Brett Walker

2013-06-26 Thread Andrea Aime
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies < ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote: > +1. > > I changed the title to attract attention. You need three +1 votes. See > also: > http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/roles/commit.html Here goes the second +1 Cheers Andrea -- == Our supp