Hi Justin,
I am trying to get uomLabels to appear in LineString, based on GML 3.2:
http://schemas.opengis.net/gml/3.2.1/geometryBasic0d1d.xsd.
(Actually from GML 3.1.0 onwards).
I can see if I make changes to AbstractGeometryTypeBinding, it will create the
same problem with srsDimension (where
Hi developers with permission to accept/apply pull requests,
Can somebody have a look at the pull requests mentioned below? These ones solve
the issue about synonyms in databases http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4486
Andrea had a look at the code in a previous pull request which was ok with
I had a look, but have a hesitation accepting a pull request when I am not in
position to test (against oracle for SYNONYM).
I have just finished my pre-flight checks for GeoTools, but would like to see
if we can get this in since you have asked so nicely. While we wait to see if
an active
I am running the jdbc-oracle online tests on master against Oracle 11g
11.2.0.3.0.
Don't you think it is a little close to release to squeeze this one in?
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 17/07/13 16:09, Jody Garnett wrote:
I had a look, but have a hesitation accepting a pull request when I am
not in
Jody,
it took twice as long a normal to run and failed with a NPE locally:
OracleTypeNamesTestOnlineTestCase.run:123-JDBCTypeNamesTest.testTypeNames:36
ยป NullPointer
And on Jenkins:
https://cgsrv8.arrc.csiro.au/jenkins/view/geoserver-master/job/geotools-master/529/consoleText
Kind regards,
Ben
geotools-master-jdbc Oracle tests are being skipped on Hudson because of
a failure to connect:
http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-master-jdbc/343/console
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian
The release is done but not announced.
If I can ask for any volunteers to test
http://gridlock.opengeo.org/geotools/release/10-beta/
The next step is Kevin releasing a GWC (tomorrow?), and then I can continue
with the GeoServer 2.4 beta.
This means there is a small timeframe where when any
Well that is sadly terrible :(
I will rollback the change and start my release story again.
--
Jody Garnett
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 7:19 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
Jody,
it took twice as long a normal to run and failed with a NPE locally:
Sorry Kevin I need to try again, I suffered a lapse of judgement and accepted a
pull request without being in position to test it locally :(
--
Jody Garnett
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 8:43 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
The release is done but not announced.
If I can ask for any
Ok, but I think this is not really necessary.
Only somebody has to grant the permission for synonyms to database access of
the test run, or am I wrong?
Regards,
Robin
Von: Jody Garnett [mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Juli 2013 12:46
An: Ben Caradoc-Davies
Cc: Robin
It is only necessary as Kevin is waiting on me before releasing GWC.
I am not sure about the permissions of the test database, most of our tests
create the tables and so on as needed. Perhaps Ben will be able to give you
more information.
--
Jody Garnett
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 8:55
Hi Andrea,
I have found a build break when done using JDK7. The build breaks in Coverage
Experiment/NetCDF Grid Coverage Module.
This is caused by a subtle change in the definition of TreeMap#put(K key, V
value) in Java 7 when compared in Java 6. Look at the source code and follow
the code in
It has successfully deployed to maven so GWC should be good to go - let me know
when GWC is deployed into maven.
If anyone has a moment to test please download from
http://gridlock.opengeo.org/geotools/release/10-beta/
I note that the rsync to source forge failed - Indeed it is looking for a
More investigation...
Having a look in org.geotools.imageio.unidata.UnidataVariableAdapter; the cause
of the problem revolves around the definition and usage of globalDomainExtent
(line 278).
This is used to store DateRanges and NumberRanges. Each range has a comparator
defined in
would adding -p to that mkdir fix these problems or is the whole directory
name wrong?
Ian
On 17 July 2013 15:09, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com wrote:
It has successfully deployed to maven so GWC should be good to go - let
me know when GWC is deployed into maven.
If anyone has a
Thanks for the response.
From recent commits, it seems that you added the
org.geotools.imageio.unidata.UnidataVariableAdapter class on the 3/7
(b45cf97, Improve the NG raster API, add support in NetCDF readers for
multiple coverages, read only structured grid coverage reader support, high
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Brett Walker
brett.wal...@geometryit.comwrote:
More investigation...
Having a look in org.geotools.imageio.unidata.UnidataVariableAdapter; the
cause of the problem revolves around the definition and usage of
globalDomainExtent (line 278).
This is used to
Simone
Simone
Ciao Bret,
I had a quick look and I am happy withe changes. I will create a jira
and backport to 9.x
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for
more information.
==
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Founder/Director
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
I think it may be that the regex does not expect beta and is thus calculating
the parent name wrong.
I would of expected g/ge/geotools/GeoTools 10/10-beta
In any case it is not a trouble, and I have some time while we wait for GWC to
be released.
--
Jody Garnett
On Thursday, 18 July 2013
Robin and Ben:
If you can clean up this patch today, and Ben verifies I can regenerate the
release. It looks like we may get a last minuet fix for Java 7 (based on the
other email thread).
--
Jody Garnett
On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 9:40 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
It is only necessary
Were you expecting this in the current release? If so please advise.
(And thanks for stepping up with all the pull request Brett)
--
Jody Garnett
On Thursday, 18 July 2013 at 2:58 AM, Simone Giannecchini wrote:
Ciao Bret,
I had a quick look and I am happy withe changes. I will create a
I have no need for it to be in the 10 release.
I did find a bug when building using jdk7 on a different matter altogether.
I have talked to Andrea about this.
Brett
Sent from my iPad
On 18/07/2013, at 9:52 AM, Jody Garnett
jody.garn...@gmail.commailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com wrote:
Were you
Just poking my nose in here although it's not really my business...
The 1.3.1 version contains a number of bug fixes, including important
contributions from Simone, so it would be nice to move up to it as
soon as possible.
Michael
On 18 July 2013 09:58, Brett Walker brett.wal...@geometryit.com
No it is all good. Not a GeoTools bug. Resolved by granting CREATE
SYNONYM privilege to the Oracle test user.
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4512
On 17/07/13 18:46, Jody Garnett wrote:
Well that is sadly terrible :(
I will rollback the change and start my release story again.
--
Note that it breaks GeoServer wps-core on master and 2.3.x:
Build failure in wps-core CoverageUtilities caused by jaitools upgrade
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5892
On 18/07/13 08:41, Michael Bedward wrote:
Just poking my nose in here although it's not really my business...
The 1.3.1
It was GeoSolutions that urgently wanted the bug fixes to JAITools
that are contained in v1.3.1. That was a few months ago, so it seems
surprising that neither GeoTools or GeoServer have taken advantage of
them. If that's due to any continuing problems at the JAITools end,
let me know.
Michael
There is an API change. Looks like wps-core needs to use a builder
rather than directly invoking a constructor. Generics might also have
been added.
On 18/07/13 11:55, Michael Bedward wrote:
It was GeoSolutions that urgently wanted the bug fixes to JAITools
that are contained in v1.3.1. That
Gerson
Hi Ben,
I noticed the API change.
It lost the ability to supply a default value. I wasn't impressed with it.
If you look at my patch to help with the upgrade it might give you some ideas
in how to address the GeoServer problems.
As I said in the original post; I ' brutalise a method' to get
On 18 July 2013 14:43, Brett Walker brett.wal...@geometryit.com wrote:
It lost the ability to supply a default value. I wasn't impressed with it.
Concerning GS - I know nothing :)
Concerning JAITools and your not being impressed - I suggest you
discuss any concerns with Simone since he
I was going to try to start the GS release today but I'll hold until later
to see if anyone want's to fix this as the european day progresses.
Ian
On 18 July 2013 04:39, Ben Caradoc-Davies ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.auwrote:
Note that it breaks GeoServer wps-core on master and 2.3.x:
Build
He must be fine with it.
He merged my pull request and back-ported it to the 9.x branch
The way I seemed to fixed the default value is, and this is my point of
uncertainty, can be seen in the following code extract:
for (int i = 0; i size; i++) {
final Range range =
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Michael Bedward
michael.bedw...@gmail.comwrote:
It was GeoSolutions that urgently wanted the bug fixes to JAITools
that are contained in v1.3.1. That was a few months ago, so it seems
surprising that neither GeoTools or GeoServer have taken advantage of
them.
36 matches
Mail list logo
