I did a quick scan and it looks good to me.
On 22 April 2014 08:42, Nicola Lagomarsini <
nicola.lagomars...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> If it helps, it has been used for a month and it has worked fine.
>
> Cheers,
> Nicola.
>
>
> 2014-04-22 17:23 GMT+02:00 Nicola Lagomarsini <
> nicola.lagomars..
Looks good to me.
On 22 April 2014 08:42, Nicola Lagomarsini <
nicola.lagomars...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> If it helps, it has been used for a month and it has worked fine.
>
> Cheers,
> Nicola.
>
>
> 2014-04-22 17:23 GMT+02:00 Nicola Lagomarsini <
> nicola.lagomars...@geo-solutions.it>:
>
> H
If it helps, it has been used for a month and it has worked fine.
Cheers,
Nicola.
2014-04-22 17:23 GMT+02:00 Nicola Lagomarsini <
nicola.lagomars...@geo-solutions.it>:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm asking if I can backport my modifications related to the WMSTileFuser
> on the 1.5.x branch of GeoWebCache.
>
Hi all,
I'm asking if I can backport my modifications related to the WMSTileFuser
on the 1.5.x branch of GeoWebCache.
NOTE: The pull request will upgrade the ImageIO-Ext version.
I will be pleased to answer to your questions.
Cheers,
Nicola.
2014-04-08 19:19 GMT+02:00 Nicola Lagomarsini <
nic
Hi all,
I have prepared the first pull request related to the backport of my
modifications for the WMSTileFuser(GeoWebCache) on GeoTools 11.x.
The pull request is https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/410.
NOTE: This pull requests will upgrade the ImageIO-Ext version from 1.1.8 to
1.1.9 whic
Hi all,
I would ask if I can backport my modifications related to the WMSTileFuser
class (GeoWebCache) on the following versions of GeoTools, GeoServer and
GeoWebCache:
- Geotools: 11.x and 10.x
- GeoServer: 2.5.x and 2.4.x
- GeoWebCache: 1.5.x
I will wait a month from the date of eac
Hi all,
I have changed the hints configurations by differentiating the
interpolation type for each configuration:
- speed = nearest interpolation (link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_H-B1p4qGi6aXN1TGpwNUc0MWs/edit?usp=sharing
)
- default = bilinear interpolation (link
https://d
Hi all,
I have changed the quality factor to 0.25 and the image size is above 40kb.
Here you can find the links for the new compressed images.
speed configuration link:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_H-B1p4qGi6OHhRZU9GcXZTZG8/edit?usp=sharing
default configuration link:
https://drive.google.c
Hi all,
I have set the quality factor to 0.1 inside the pull requests.
Cheers,
Nicola.
2014-03-07 11:11 GMT+01:00 Nicola Lagomarsini <
nicola.lagomars...@geo-solutions.it>:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> the quality parameter can be configured inside the application context for
> the PNGEncoder inside the g
Hi Andrea,
the quality parameter can be configured inside the application context for
the PNGEncoder inside the gwc-wms and gs-gwc modules. By setting for
example the quality parameter to 0.1 the image size is considerably reduced.
About the hints considerations I have used different hints for ea
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Nicola Lagomarsini <
nicola.lagomars...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm going to show some images for comparing the old wmsTileFuser class and
> its modified version, both in *fullWMS* mode enabled.
>
> I made the *fullWMS* parameter configurable from th
Hi all,
I'm going to show some images for comparing the old wmsTileFuser class and
its modified version, both in *fullWMS* mode enabled.
I made the *fullWMS* parameter configurable from the geowebcache.xml file
by adding the TRUE(or FALSE) field.
I added the possibility for the user to change th
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Simone Giannecchini <
simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> Ciao Nicola,
> I would leave this parameter as it was originally, which is False.
>
> This behaviour should be, IMHO, enabled explicitly if needed.
>
The annoying bit is that now it's enabled in S
Ciao Nicola,
I would leave this parameter as it was originally, which is False.
This behaviour should be, IMHO, enabled explicitly if needed.
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for
more information.
==
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simog
Hi all,
I would ask you a question about the GeoWebCache configuration.
In my pull request I have set the GeoWebCache *fullWMS* parameter from
FALSE to TRUE inside the applicationContext for enabling the operations
with the WMSTileFuser class.
Could this parameter always be set to true or it mus
Hi all,
I have sent you the following pull requests to review. They should be
merged in the following order:
Geotools --> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/384
GeoWebCache --> https://github.com/GeoWebCache/geowebcache/pull/229
GeoServer --> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/524
Hi Jody,
I will apply my changes only when the 11.0 will go out.
Cheers,
Nicola.
2014-03-01 13:32 GMT+01:00 Jody Garnett :
> Question: are you wishing to apply this to 11.x before 11.0 goes out? That
> is a bit risk, if that is your intention you will need to move promptly to
> perform the cha
Question: are you wishing to apply this to 11.x before 11.0 goes out? That
is a bit risk, if that is your intention you will need to move promptly to
perform the change prior to RC2 going out.
Jody
Jody Garnett
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Nicola Lagomarsini <
nicola.lagomars...@geo-solution
Hi all,
I would recall the proposal for modifying the WMSTileFuser class in order
to reach better performances on image reading and writing.
The modifications on the WMSTileFuser class can be divided in 3 groups:
- improving the reading of every tile and the final image writing by
adding f
Not from me, technically what you are doing is very clear cut.
It would be good to hear back from GWC list as that appears to be the most
effected (i.e. new functionality).
Jody Garnett
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Nicola Lagomarsini <
nicola.lagomars...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> Ok I wil
Ok I will send an email to the ML.
Is there another feedback?
Cheers,
Nicola.
2014-02-10 12:37 GMT+01:00 Jody Garnett :
> I am always troubled by such questions, let me think.
>
> As the original contributor you can pick up the code and contribute it to
> another project.
>
> Since it is Nicol
I am always troubled by such questions, let me think.
As the original contributor you can pick up the code and contribute it to
another project.
Since it is Nicola is doing the work, your +1 on the GeoServer list as a
PSC will work out fine. That way the GeoServer list has a record that the
reque
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> So I understand what is being proposed. I suppose my questions twofold a)
> what is your time frame for this work and b) why 10.x ( since we are
> nearing the 11.0)?
>
> As for moving code between projects, everything looks okay. For the
> Ge
So I understand what is being proposed. I suppose my questions twofold a)
what is your time frame for this work and b) why 10.x ( since we are
nearing the 11.0)?
As for moving code between projects, everything looks okay. For the
GeoServer code subject to a license change we will need a email requ
24 matches
Mail list logo
