Okay, I dug around here a bit and I don't see any surprising behavior
here. It looks like adding that Color->String conversion fixed the
problem I was seeing as well, so even the first patch probably doesn't
fix anything any more. Sorry for the noise.
--
David Winslow
OpenGeo - http://openge
Oops, I commented on the GeoServer ticket before seeing this. For
convenience I'll copy/paste:
I'm not evaluating expressions anywhere; the CSS file gets converted
to an instance of org.geotools.styling.Style and passed to GeoTools'
SLDTransformer.transform(). When no color is specifie
Thanks David; next time can you supply a test case so we can show that the
patch "does" something? (or indeed does anything?)
As Andrea indicated we should focus a bit more on getting patches in and
reviewed so we can recommend new committers; in part by following the same
procedure ourselves :
We should stay on the list and that stack trace should go into the bug
report :-)
So now we are making some progress it is ParameterGroup that is having trouble?
Those classes are not really supposed to be that mutable (and thus not need
cloning). Oh wait maybe it was ParameterGroupDescri
I have a tiny little patch that I'd love to see make it into this release:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3036
As far as I know this only shows itself in the GeoServer css community
module, and there's an easy workaround, but it would be nice to get it
working in GeoTools proper.
--
Davi
Comments inline.
On 12/05/2010, at 10:02 PM, Joachim Van der Auwera wrote:
> Dear Jody,
>
> Nobody on our team has commit rights.
Well that can be fixed; I see andrea has already indicated how :-) We do try to
be an open welcoming project if there is anything we can do to assist let us
know.
Joachim Van der Auwera ha scritto:
> Dear Jody,
>
> Nobody on our team has commit rights.
>
> The patch does not literally include a patch, but it includes details
> about the fix and how to reproduce the problem (fix just involves adding
> "implements Cloneable" on "org.geotools.referencing.wk
Dear Jody,
Nobody on our team has commit rights.
The patch does not literally include a patch, but it includes details
about the fix and how to reproduce the problem (fix just involves adding
"implements Cloneable" on "org.geotools.referencing.wkt.Formattable").
Kind regards,
Joachim
On 05/12
> On 11 May 2010 17:19, Jody Garnett wrote:
>>
>> Michael can your interpolate function be brought in from the cold? I think
>> it has gotten some review now ...
>>
With Andrea's help, the problems with the last patch have been fixed
and a new one is attached to the issue...
http://jira.codehaus.
Sure; do you have someone with commit access to apply the patch? Is there a
patch :-) Is there a test case...
I am not going to call "out of the pool" until Friday according to the CSIRO
crew doing the geoserver release; so you have some time to get fixes in.
Jody
On 12/05/2010, at 4:17 PM, Jo
Dear Jody,
Would it still be possible to consider GEOT-3062 for inclusion in this
release?
That would help Geomajas to use the latest version.
Thanks,
Joachim
On 05/11/2010 09:19 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> We are going to get a GeoTools 2.6.4 out this week :-)
>
> By happy chance both uDig and G
On 11 May 2010 17:19, Jody Garnett wrote:
>
> Michael can your interpolate function be brought in from the cold? I think it
> has gotten some review now ...
>
Andrea said he managed to break it. I'm waiting for him to tell me how
he did it :-)
Michael
---
We are going to get a GeoTools 2.6.4 out this week :-)
By happy chance both uDig and GeoServer are getting released at the same time;
so this release of GeoTools will be subject to lots of testing.
Michael can your interpolate function be brought in from the cold? I think it
has gotten some rev
13 matches
Mail list logo
