On 17/05/10 18:25, Jody Garnett wrote:
> I think you are into proposal territory - ie a modification that would impact
> our build process.
I am not so sure. It should have no visible impact whatsoever on the
build process. It is more changing the means of delivery of documents
required for the
Hi Ben.
I think you are into proposal territory - ie a modification that would impact
our build process.
I like the idea of an alternative to storing stuff in svn we have now:
- http://svn.osgeo.org/geotools/branches/2.6.x/modules/ogc
Would you be able to migrate the existing schemas?
While it
Jody,
I have 10 jar files containing various suites of application schemas (at
this time mostly GeoSciML 2.0 and dependencies) that I would like to
have available at GeoTools test time. These are as-published schemas,
packaged in an implementation-neutral structure. I'd like to upload them
ont
