Hi Justin,
In ContentDataStore I attempted to implement it by having
ContentFeatureSource be able to join itself to another query / view.
But again never tested it.
The patch doesn't include ContentDataStore currently, but would you be
happy if we dropped the getView method from it ?
Michael
On 5/4/10 12:10 AM, Michael Bedward wrote:
Hi Justin,
In ContentDataStore I attempted to implement it by having
ContentFeatureSource be able to join itself to another query / view.
But again never tested it.
The patch doesn't include ContentDataStore currently, but would you be
happy if we
Thanks Andrea.
Michael, +1 from me.
The only implementation in the app-schema suite is in get-webservice
WS_DataStore, which throws UnsupportedOperationException for getView,
which is a vote to remove getView. :-)
On 03/05/10 23:01, Andrea Aime wrote:
This is actually from Michael, I just
Thanks Ben, I'll add that in to the patch.
Michael
On 5 May 2010 12:58, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
Thanks Andrea.
Michael, +1 from me.
The only implementation in the app-schema suite is in get-webservice
WS_DataStore, which throws UnsupportedOperationException for getView, which
is a vote
This is actually from Michael, I just moved into its own
thread to make it more visible:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Remove+DataStore+getView+method
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
Thanks Andrea:
One think I notice with both this proposal and your caching feature source is
that we could really stand to have a stable of features source wrappers to roll
out. I don't have my heart set on accessing them all from DataUtilities; but I
can see the attraction of not defining
+1 as well as far as I know this is never something that has been
implemented properly or well tested.
In ContentDataStore I attempted to implement it by having
ContentFeatureSource be able to join itself to another query / view.
But again never tested it.
-Justin
On 5/3/10 7:22 AM, Jody
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
This is actually from Michael, I just moved into its own
thread to make it more visible:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Remove+DataStore+getView+method
Oh, +1 for me as well. Barely used and can be implemented efficiently
and generically using a utility
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Andrea Aime aa...@opengeo.org wrote:
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
This is actually from Michael, I just moved into its own
thread to make it more visible:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Remove+DataStore+getView+method
Oh, +1 for me as well. Barely used
