Did the proposal also want to remove (deprecate in this case) the collection
listeners?
Or was it just the discussion block in the jira?
The CollectionEvent support is replaced by FeatureEvent (i.e. feature source
level) as per another already approved proposal.
Indeed it was completing that
Sorry I did not look closely at the proposal, I only deprecated what it
described, and left the sort and subCollection methods in place (as it also
described). I will double check the remaining methods and update the
proposal page if you like. I am more focused on the patch right now.
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.comwrote:
I think getDescriptor() is simply missing.
Still don't get it. The need is either clear or it should be left out.
I don't get what you don't get :(
getSchema(): FeatureType (holds the type of the element of the
Okay I get where the confusion comes from …
This is not the descriptor of the feature collection (which you are correct
would be handled by whatever is containing it). This is instead only talking
about getting a better handle on the contents of our feature collection.
My impression this is
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.comwrote:
Ugh, implemented as you suggest it will affect performance of WPS chaining
a lot.
This is due to the removal of the subCollection methods, which are the
only way to have a streaming process
(one that returns a
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.comwrote:
A very old proposal removing the methods that assume an in memory model:
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/FeatureCollection+revolution
I have a small non-destructive patch providing the remaining
Ugh, implemented as you suggest it will affect performance of WPS chaining a
lot.
This is due to the removal of the subCollection methods, which are the only
way to have a streaming process
(one that returns a computing collection) compute less data if a downstream
process needs
A very old proposal removing the methods that assume an in memory model:
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/FeatureCollection+revolution
I have a small non-destructive patch providing the remaining deprecations
outlined in the proposal:
- https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4181
Can
