Re: [Geotools-devel] QA branch is going live (was "thinking about static analysis")

2018-12-27 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi all, think I'm getting to a point where I'm satisfied with the results: - added a few more rules in PMD - added errorprone in the mix and got a full build going (requires JDK 11) - the travis build is still erratic, works fine locally but goes OOM on Travis (done at least twice)

Re: [Geotools-devel] QA branch is going live (was "thinking about static analysis")

2018-12-27 Thread Andrea Aime
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 9:01 AM Andrea Aime wrote: > Next steps: > >- I want to see if I can use the Travis build matrix ability in order >to have three builds, a jdk 8 without formatting checks, a jdk 11 without >formatting checks, and a QA JDK 8 build that does formatting checks and

[Geotools-devel] QA branch is going live (was "thinking about static analysis")

2018-12-27 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi all, following the discussion about static analysis, and considering there have been no negative statements about it, here is a branch to host the collaborative work on adding automatic QA checks in the codebase: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/tree/qa There is also a pull request to check