[Geotools-devel] release train underway

The release train is underway, if I can ask merge and so on to be discussed please. *GeoTools* - https://github.com/geotools/geotools/tree/32.x tag is created - main branch is 33-SNAPSHOT - 32.x branch is 32-SNAPSHOT - https://github.com/geotools/geotools/releases/tag/32.0 is made but

[Geotools-devel] Release artefacts for 31.3 now ready to test

Please give them a whirl from https://build.geoserver.org/view/release/job/geotools-release/126/artifact/build/release/distribution/31.3/ Ian -- Ian Turton ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.n

[Geotools-devel] Release 30.2 available for preflight testing

Hello everyone: Downloads are available here: https://build.geoserver.org/view/release/job/geotools-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/build/release/distribution/30.2/ for preflight testing. Other things to review: - Jira Release notes: https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/projects/GEOT/vers

[Geotools-devel] Release train starting tomorrow

Good day developers I will be starting with a maintenance release of GeoServer 2.23.4 in conjunction with GeoTools 29.4 (and GeoWebCache if necessary) tomorrow, so if anyone wants to get code into these releases, please do it in the next 24 hours. Thank you Peter ___

[Geotools-devel] Release trains progress

Peter: I have released: - GeoTools 30.0 to maven / source forge (so artifacts were available for downstream projects) - https://github.com/mapfish/mapfish-print-v2/releases/tag/release%2F2.3.0 - https://github.com/GeoWebCache/geowebcache/releases/tag/1.24.0 There is one PR to rev

Re: [Geotools-devel] release candidate starting

And here is mapfish-print-v2: 2.3-RC Release Candidate Both GeoTools 30-RC and mapfish-print-v2 2.3-RC are now available in maven. Over to you Andrea! -- Jody Garnett On Sep 22, 2023 at 12:17:37 AM, Jody Garnett wrote

[Geotools-devel] release candidate starting

As the release process is being split over several days there the build jobs for "main" will be disabled for a bit. If you are merging any PRs be sure to backport to the new geotools 30.x branch. Nightly build had the following revisions: version = 2.24-SNAPSHOT > git revision = 73b838957c2d729b

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release artefacts for 29.2 for testing

Op 18-07-2023 om 18:25 schreef Ian Turton: On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 5:57 AM Ian Turton > wrote: Goto https://build.geoserver.org/view/release/job/geotools-release/99/artifact/build/release/distribution/29.2/

Re: [Geotools-devel] release failiure - source forge directory structure change

On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 5:02 AM Jody Garnett wrote: > Eventually --protect-args worked so we are back in the game. > Doh, this is a surprise! Thanks for looking into this! Cheers Andrea == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more informati

Re: [Geotools-devel] release failiure - source forge directory structure change

I experimented with this today as a background activity; sorry for all the noise from the build box. It looks to be differences in how to encode spaces in "GeoTools 29 Releases" folder, various combinations of quotes and spaces are recommended, command line options (s / --protect-args) to prevent

Re: [Geotools-devel] release failiure - source forge directory structure change

Oh sorry this is the source forge upload, perhaps source forge directory structure changed - do we have a new location in mind? Jody On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 3:23 AM Ian Turton wrote: > I'm fairly sure we ran into this last time too, it seems that the project > directory has moved, looking at th

Re: [Geotools-devel] release failiure - source forge directory structure change

Something indeed moved recently, Torben was working on it with the system admin committee. Perhaps check the other documentation builds? I am sure we just did not think about the release documentation being uploaded int the same fashion. Jody On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 3:23 AM Ian Turton wrote: >

[Geotools-devel] release failiure - source forge directory structure change

I'm fairly sure we ran into this last time too, it seems that the project directory has moved, looking at the docs ( https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/rsync/) it seems that aiming for /home/frs/project/geotools/29.2/ Is this a fix that needs to go into main and be backported? Or is it

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release artefacts for 29.2 for testing

Just a guess: you have in the classpath, first a JRE 11, then a JDK 17. The first one provides the java, but does not have a javac, which is being provided by Java 17 instead. Cheers Andrea On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 9:24 AM Ian Turton wrote: > > > On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 at 18:53, Jody Garnett wrote

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release artefacts for 29.2 for testing

On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 at 18:53, Jody Garnett wrote: > Ian, the same test works for me locally. I expect you are mixing up java > compilers on your local machine when testing. > You're right I do seem to be using Javac 17 and Java 11 - no idea why though. Ian > > The rest of the bin download look

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release artefacts for 29.2 for testing

Ian, the same test works for me locally. I expect you are mixing up java compilers on your local machine when testing. The rest of the bin download looks fine, although the footer says © Copyright 2021, Open Source Geospatial Foundation -- Jody Garnett On Jul 18, 2023 at 9:44:34 AM, Jody Garnet

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release artefacts for 29.2 for testing

Is there chance you compiled Quickstart.java with Java 17 on line one? -- Jody Garnett On Jul 18, 2023 at 9:25:48 AM, Ian Turton wrote: > I've run into the following issue: > > javac -cp "lib/*" -d bin > src/org/geotools/tutorial/quickstart/Quickstart.java > java -cp "lib/*:bin" org.geotools.t

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release artefacts for 29.2 for testing

I've run into the following issue: javac -cp "lib/*" -d bin src/org/geotools/tutorial/quickstart/Quickstart.java java -cp "lib/*:bin" org.geotools.tutorial.quickstart.Quickstart Error: LinkageError occurred while loading main class org.geotools.tutorial.quickstart.Quickstart java.lang.UnsupportedC

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release artefacts for 29.2 for testing

Oh hey Ian cool :) I was not aware we had a volunteer for the release this month. I would like to join you to test the geoserver release announcement script , and can make the GWC release if needed. Jody On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 5:57 AM Ian Turton wrote: > Goto > https://build.geoserver.org/vie

[Geotools-devel] Release artefacts for 29.2 for testing

Goto https://build.geoserver.org/view/release/job/geotools-release/99/artifact/build/release/distribution/29.2/ Ian -- Ian Turton ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools

[Geotools-devel] Release day 29.2, 1.23.2, 2.23.2

I'm about to kick off the release train for GeoTools 29.2, GeoWebCache 1.23.2 and GeoServer 2.23.2 (Well Andrea is going to do the GWC release) I'll start around 1pm UTC so if you have any last minute back ports you want included in the releases now is your chance. Ian -- Ian Turton ___

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release issues

Hi Ian, you might want to check the "ssh agent" section of the configuration... I just did and added on set of credentials (there are 3 possible, there was just one). You might find that issue in other jobs as well.. it's a bit crazy, I have been adding missing credentials in a lot of jobs and some

[Geotools-devel] Release issues

I'm seeing an SSH credentials problem with the release job ( https://build.geoserver.org/view/release/job/geotools-release/95/console) java.io.IOException: [ssh-agent] Could not find specified credentials at com.cloudbees.jenkins.plugins.sshagent.SSHAgentBuildWrapper.preCheckout(SSHAgentB

[Geotools-devel] Release delayed

Until the osgeo repo comes back the release is on hold. Ian -- Ian Turton ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release artefacts available for testing

lgië ☎+32 (0) 59 33 61 13 📧 hans.yper...@vliz.be<mailto:hans.yper...@vliz.be> www.vliz.be<http://www.vliz.be> Van: Jody Garnett Verzonden: zondag 22 januari 2023 15:46 Aan: Ian Turton CC: Geotools-Devel list Onderwerp: Re: [Geotools-devel] Release

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release artefacts available for testing

Ian: Going to asume the issue is on my end; prior releases are behaving this way also. Managed to get it to startup using: java -cp "lib/*:bin" org.geotools.tutorial.quickstart.Quickstart Which does not make a lot of sense to me. -- Jody Garnett On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 3:26 PM Jody Garnett wr

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release artefacts available for testing

Testing bin download: 1) README.html links are good 2) Bin works java -cp "lib/*" org.geotools.util.factory.GeoTools 3) The quickstart compiles javac -cp "lib/*" -d bin src/org/geotools/tutorial/quickstart/Quickstart.java However it does not run java -cp "lib/*;bin" org.geotools.tutorial.quick

[Geotools-devel] Release artefacts available for testing

Please try out the new 28.1 release - https://build.geoserver.org/view/release/job/geotools-release/73/artifact/build/release/distribution/28.1/geotools-28.1-bin.zip Ian -- Ian Turton ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release candidate progress, starting 27.x branch, untangle java11 workspace conflict...

While setting up a workspace/java11_27 was fine ... the build server is at capacity and I have had to disable the java11c jobs GeoTools 24.x / GeoWebCache 1.18.x / GeoServer 2.18.x (and clear out that workspace anyways). -- Jody Garnett On May 5, 2022 at 11:52:35 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > I am

[Geotools-devel] Release candidate progress, starting 27.x branch, untangle java11 workspace conflict...

I am following our procedure for starting a new release candidate, https://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/procedures/release.html And the request to maintain prior 24.x and 25.x is causing some conflict ... as we cycle through java11a, java11b, and java11c folders to support independent java 1

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release artefacts for GeoTools 25.5 available for testing

checking manifest.mf of gt-shapefile.jar Manifest-Version: 1.0 > Automatic-Module-Name: org.geotools.shapefile > Build-Timestamp: 18-Feb-2022 10:00 > Built-By: jenkins > Class-Path: gt-main-25.5.jar gt-referencing-25.5.jar ejml-ddense-0.34. > jar ejml-core-0.34.jar commons-pool-1.5.4.jar gt-metad

[Geotools-devel] Release artefacts for GeoTools 25.5 available for testing

https://build.geoserver.org/view/release/job/geotools-release/53/artifact/ Please let me know if there are any issues Ian -- Ian Turton ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ge

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train has not left the station, build.geoserver.org stuck

I proceed to the deploy stage, which ended up building the jars with Java 11 and deploying. Will redeploy a bit later today. Jody On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 8:51 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > Fixed, was defaulting to system: > > Maven home: /usr/share/maven > Java version: 11.0.13, vendor: Ubuntu, runt

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train has not left the station, build.geoserver.org stuck

Fixed, was defaulting to system: Maven home: /usr/share/maven Java version: 11.0.13, vendor: Ubuntu, runtime: /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64 Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 GeoTools 26.2 downlaods available here for preflight testin: - https://build.geoserver.org/view/releas

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train has not left the station, build.geoserver.org stuck

Got an unexpected failure during release: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:3.0.1:aggregate (default-cli) on project modules: An error has occurred in Javadoc report generation: Unable to find javadoc command: The environment variable JAVA_HOME is not cor

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train has not left the station, build.geoserver.org stuck

Was able to recover enough space to get builds running again; will update the list when builds are stable and release train can start. On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:00 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > Wrestled with backporting the sphinx-build fixes to stable and maintenance > branches, and now the system

[Geotools-devel] release train has not left the station, build.geoserver.org stuck

Wrestled with backporting the sphinx-build fixes to stable and maintenance branches, and now the system is stuck with: remote: Compressing objects: 100% (13/13), done. error: file write error: No space left on device fatal: unable to write loose object file I have tried scheduling the usual teame

Re: [Geotools-devel] release training 26.1 starting

The release artifacts are up https://build.geoserver.org/view/release/job/geotools-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/build/release/distribution/26.1/ Tested locally, and updated the testing instructions as part of https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3680 -- Jody Garnett On Wed, 17 Nov 2

[Geotools-devel] release training 26.1 starting

Releasing the following: version = 2.20-SNAPSHOT git revision = 6a644b86e10fedce78fadfe824a7efd93dc883ce git branch = origin/2.20.x build date = 17-Nov-2021 09:58 geotools version = 26-SNAPSHOT geotools revision = 49533f633b1634f67183fed00b0a111034869293 geowebcache version = 1.20-SNAPSHOT

Re: [Geotools-devel] release candidate reminder, and gt-imagepyramid build instability

And this one is weird instead... the test definitely tries to remove that table before re-creating it. It also works on the Github build checks and tried an online build locally, too, which works as well. Cheers Andrea On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 3:55 AM Jody Garnett wrote: > I also note that geoto

Re: [Geotools-devel] release candidate reminder, and gt-imagepyramid build instability

This one has been solved I think Cheers Andrea On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 2:54 AM Jody Garnett wrote: > Next week is marked down for making the release candidate, I note on the > build server that we have very few recent successful builds > with gt-imagepyramid responsible for the majority failure

Re: [Geotools-devel] release candidate reminder, and gt-imagepyramid build instability

I also note that geotools-main-online-postgis has not passed for some time (at least July). In this case it looks to be a consistent failure with setup method, unable to proceed as database already has tables configured (probably from a prior test). *[ERROR] testAssignedMultiPKeyView(org.g

[Geotools-devel] release candidate reminder, and gt-imagepyramid build instability

Next week is marked down for making the release candidate, I note on the build server that we have very few recent successful builds with gt-imagepyramid responsible for the majority failures. [ERROR] Tests run: 19, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 15.348 s <<< FAILURE! - in org.g

[Geotools-devel] release module added, care and feeding instructions in dev guide

The active geotools branches now include a release module - with an assembly:single goal replacing our much beloved jar collector. Care and feeding instructions are added to developers guide

[Geotools-devel] Release artefacts for 24.3 are ready to test

https://build.geoserver.org/view/release/job/geotools-release/26/artifact/ let me know if you see any issues Ian -- Ian Turton ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-d

Re: [Geotools-devel] release candidate in progress

A draft geotools blog post is ready for review, I have set it to automatically publish tomorrow (so your review window is limited!) -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 22:29, Jody Garnett wrote: > The GeoTools 25-RC release candidate is started, artifacts available for > testing here: > > > h

[Geotools-devel] release candidate in progress

The GeoTools 25-RC release candidate is started, artifacts available for testing here: https://build.geoserver.org/view/release/job/geotools-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/build/release/distribution/25-RC/ A lot of build jobs are disabled right now as we set up a new collection of jobs. --

[Geotools-devel] release candidate reminder

Just a reminder we have a release candidate scheduled for 2021-03-01 please take a look at any outstanding development or documentation you wish to include in 2.19.0. We are also seeking a volunteer for the 2.17.5 maintenance release next week, please update the release schedule

[Geotools-devel] Release day

I'm planning on building and releasing GeoTools 22.5, GeoWebCache 1.16.5 and GeoServer 2.16.5, with Kevin's assistance on the GWC release using: - GeoTools commit 381779d0a2a0789391e47660e3291c4fb1bc2cad, - GeoWebCache commit 5963f03d94908e340d0c381bc1f3c8757049ced4, - GeoServer commit

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release moving on, but ogr-bridj probably just needs to go

+1 to removing it outright. Cheers, Torben On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:28 AM Ian Turton wrote: > Go for it +1 > > Ian > > > ___ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release moving on, but ogr-bridj probably just needs to go

Go for it +1 Ian ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release moving on, but ogr-bridj probably just needs to go

+2 Regards, Simone Giannecchini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information. == Ing. Simone Giannecchini @simoge

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release moving on, but ogr-bridj probably just needs to go

That works, it is available in prior branch if someone wants to grab it. -- Jody Garnett On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 10:57, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Jody, > I was proposing something a bit more drastic, to just remove the code > period. > Would anyone around here care? > > Cheers > Andrea > > On Tue,

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release moving on, but ogr-bridj probably just needs to go

Hi Jody, I was proposing something a bit more drastic, to just remove the code period. Would anyone around here care? Cheers Andrea On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 7:53 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > Please remove it from the build; unsupported modules have one job - don't > break the build. > - > Jody Garne

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release moving on, but ogr-bridj probably just needs to go

Please remove it from the build; unsupported modules have one job - don't break the build. - Jody Garnett On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 08:08, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > during the release we found the GeoTools release job was failing to > build ogr-bridj... it was the "build release with clear maven

[Geotools-devel] Release moving on, but ogr-bridj probably just needs to go

Hi, during the release we found the GeoTools release job was failing to build ogr-bridj... it was the "build release with clear maven repo" that was failing (too a bit to figure it out). We saw all other build jobs explicitly skip the module, so did the same in the release job... But if the build

[Geotools-devel] Release of 23.0/1/17.0/2.17.0 begining

I'm kicking off the release chain using GeoServer 6549c85312853ecb22b51d258423c983f22617cd GeoWebCache - a31bcff2bd98e40c2dc5d176efe3b64b38d11429 GeoTools - 9dca3294fe372826163e25e46a3a1ae7a26a8684 I'll keep people informed on the lists as I go, I expect to have artifacts ready to test this after

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release of 21-RC nearly finished

Hi Ian, I've updated it also looking at the release notes for the M0, which did not include any of the new features in the blog post: https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10001&version=16745 I'd recommend doing the same for the GeoServer one ;-) Cheers Andrea On Fri

[Geotools-devel] Release of 21-RC nearly finished

if anyone would like to check the blog post ( https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=116830172286767929) and make sure I mentioned all the new goodies. I'll push publish over the weekend. Ian -- Ian Turton ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Dev

[Geotools-devel] Release today for release candidate

I'm kicking off the release train today using the following git revisions: version = 2.15-SNAPSHOT git revision = 5003db5a6f6aeb3b2685545c447ff08435bbf9db git branch = origin/master build date = 24-Jan-2019 11:45 geotools version = 21-SNAPSHOT geotools revision = aafc794682de6401f5905f312b688295c0

[Geotools-devel] Release Volunteers for 2.14.0

The GeoServer 2.14.0 (And GeoWebCache 1.14.0 and GeoTools 20.0) release is scheduled for Tuesday of next week, and we currently don't have a release volunteer. Any takers? I do have some availability to do the release, but a second pair

[Geotools-devel] Release of 17.4 next week

I will be releasing 17.4 next week starting on Monday (my time). If you have any urgent fixes for the maintenance branch that have not yet been applied, please make yourself known. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Director Transient Software Limited New Zealand --

Re: [Geotools-devel] release artifacts for 17.3 ready to test

just added "release" label, looks good, unexciting which is perfect for a maintenance release. I have "scheduled" it to publish in six hours to give others a chance to review (and so you do not have to go back and hit publish). -- Jody Garnett On 22 October 2017 at 01:50, Andrea Aime wrote: >

Re: [Geotools-devel] release artifacts for 17.3 ready to test

I hit the buttons yesterday; the jars are the same for the downstream apps so we are all good. Thanks for making the blog post I will check that next. -- Jody Garnett On 22 October 2017 at 01:46, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Jody, > do you want to rebuild the release to fix those links in the artif

Re: [Geotools-devel] release artifacts for 17.3 ready to test

By the way, yesterday I created a draft blog post for the 17.3 release, if you want to review it, it's here in draft form: https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=116830172286767929#editor/target=post;postID=8346314842385137991;onPublishedMenu=allposts;onClosedMenu=allposts;postNum=0;src=postname

Re: [Geotools-devel] release artifacts for 17.3 ready to test

Hi Jody, do you want to rebuild the release to fix those links in the artifacts? Personally I don't think it's that important, I guess maintenance users are just upgrading to get bug fixes, rather than to learn about GeoTools (hopefully the latter are using master/stable) Cheers Andrea On Sun, O

Re: [Geotools-devel] release artifacts for 17.3 ready to test

I have pushed up doc fixes for 17.x and 18x branches; no functionality has changed only README and docs. geotools revision = 91da30370532a4e38a366e504ec17e65e3f78cb2 -- Jody Garnett On 21 October 2017 at 19:43, Jody Garnett wrote: > Sorry noticed this draft was not sent - please check: > > htt

[Geotools-devel] release artifacts for 17.3 ready to test

Sorry noticed this draft was not sent - please check: https://build.geoserver.org/geotools/release/17.3/ The revision list for this round is: version = 2.11-SNAPSHOT git revision = 53391a040b12e4d73e177962bc70e14ac34a7cf9 git branch = origin/2.11.x build date = 20-Oct-2017 16:55 geotools versio

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release artifacts for 18.0 ready to test

Local build was successful on an empty maven repo. Docs look good (although I did notice the copyright at the bottom says 2016). Torben On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 4:01 AM, Ian Turton wrote: > Please have a go with https://build.geoserver.org/geotools/release/18.0/ > > Ian > > -- > Ian Turton > > -

[Geotools-devel] Release artifacts for 18.0 ready to test

Please have a go with https://build.geoserver.org/geotools/release/18.0/ Ian -- Ian Turton -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release 18.0 & 2.12.0

I'm running into an issue running the cite tests for 2.12.x, maven claims not to be able to fetch tomcat:catalina:jar:5.5.9 - I'm not sure if this is an error in the way I set the jobs up, though I just copied the 2.11 jobs over or an issue with the build server. Can some one with log in access ha

[Geotools-devel] Release 18.0 & 2.12.0

Are there any blockers based on the RC1? If not I'll go ahead and kick off the release tomorrow AM (UK time). Ian -- Ian Turton -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slas

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release of geotools 16.5 & geoserver 2.10.5

Looks like the release is on hold until Jira comes back. Ian On 17 August 2017 at 16:43, Ian Turton wrote: > I'm planning to push the release for geotools 16.5 and geoserver 2.10.5 on > Monday (or possibly Tuesday as my flight arrives home on Monday morning). > If Kevin can check if GWC needs a

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release of geotools 16.5 & geoserver 2.10.5

Thanks Ian, I am happy to do the beta later in the week (say Thursday?). We can sort it out on Tuesday meeting. On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:44 AM Ian Turton wrote: > I'm planning to push the release for geotools 16.5 and geoserver 2.10.5 on > Monday (or possibly Tuesday as my flight arrives home o

[Geotools-devel] Release of geotools 16.5 & geoserver 2.10.5

I'm planning to push the release for geotools 16.5 and geoserver 2.10.5 on Monday (or possibly Tuesday as my flight arrives home on Monday morning). If Kevin can check if GWC needs a related release I will need an assistant to run that for me. So if you have any changes you would like to backport

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release artifacts for 16.3 (try two)

Doh, I did launch a clean build from empty repo, but then forgot to report back: [INFO] [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 33:16 min [INFO]

[Geotools-devel] Release artifacts for 16.3 (try two)

I've rebuilt the release artifacts for 16.3 - http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/16.3 please give them a quick test Ian -- Ian Turton -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release job failed - out of memory

Hi Ian, I see the geotools build completed, do you need me to run the GeoWebCache one? Cheers Andrea On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Sent you credentials on skype > > Cheers > Andrea > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Ian Turton wrote: > >> Turns out I don't seem to ha

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release job failed - out of memory

Sent you credentials on skype Cheers Andrea On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Ian Turton wrote: > Turns out I don't seem to have a log in for ares, can anyone help out with > this? > > Ian > > On 20 January 2017 at 10:37, Ian Turton wrote: > >> I've just tried the GeoTools 15.4 release and it'

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release job failed - out of memory

Turns out I don't seem to have a log in for ares, can anyone help out with this? Ian On 20 January 2017 at 10:37, Ian Turton wrote: > I've just tried the GeoTools 15.4 release and it's failed > > with > a GC O

[Geotools-devel] Release job failed - out of memory

I've just tried the GeoTools 15.4 release and it's failed with a GC Overhead limit exceeded. I seem to recall (but can't find) a previous discussion about increasing the amount of memory allocated to jenkins jobs.

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release managers for GeoTools/GWC/GeoServer September release trains

Hi Andrea Devon and I can take the beta. We will likely perform the release on the 16th, so as not to run the risk of colliding with any potential late-running ares jobs from your release on Monday. Torben On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi folks, > me and Alessandro are

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release managers for GeoTools/GWC/GeoServer September release trains

Hi folks, me and Alessandro are going to take the 1.9.2 release train, likely performing the release on the 19th. Any takers for the beta? Cheers Andrea On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > Sunday September 18th we have two release blocks: > * GeoTools 15.2/GWC 1.9.2/GS 2.

[Geotools-devel] Release managers for GeoTools/GWC/GeoServer September release trains

Hi, Sunday September 18th we have two release blocks: * GeoTools 15.2/GWC 1.9.2/GS 2.9.2, a stable release train (with a few backports of new features, parametric config, jpeg/png, backup/restore) * GeoTools 17.beta/GWC 1.10-beta/GS 2.10-beta, a beta release train Any takers? Cheers Andrea -- =

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release guide improvements

- https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1182 (GeoTools) Merged to master, thanks for updating. If there is any interest in using the REST api to automate we can always redo the automated instructions. -- Mobile securit

[Geotools-devel] Release guide improvements

When doing the GeoTools 15-RC1 / GeoServer 2.9-RC1 release, I ran ito a bunch of places in the release guide that were incomplete or out of date. I have attempted to fix these with the following PRs: - https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1182 (GeoTools) - https://github.com/geoserver/g

[Geotools-devel] Release manager for gt 14.3/gs 2.8.3

Hi, the release above should have been cut yesterday, but I don't see anyone on the hook in the last meeting minutes, or in the release schedule. I honestly can't remember if I volunteer during the last meeting, or not? If there is no one else, I'll try to get it started tomorrow, let me know if

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release blocked, lack of builds

I am afraid repo.boundlessgeo.com (and many boundless websites) have been unable this week. I think we will need to delay the release :( I am afraid this is a website issue, not a network issue Andrea :( -- Jody Garnett On 26 September 2015 at 01:30, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > I was setting up

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release blocked, lack of builds

Hi, added the builds needed, but I experienced troubles with builds failing due to OOM. I could reproduce locally and the vertict is, we are just loading too many classes to run the tests with just 256MB of memory, pumped them up to 512. Now the normal build of 2.8.x succeded, but it's having a re

[Geotools-devel] Release blocked, lack of builds

Hi, I was setting up to do the final releases, but it seems we are lacking all the relevant builds to be used for a release, to start with. The release indeed requires to check if GeoServer has passed the CITE tests, pick the GeoTools and GeoServer revision numbers from it, and cut the release the

[Geotools-devel] Release blocker? - (GEOT-5197) SQL syntax error in gt-jdbc-postgis PostgisDataStoreOnlineTest

Jody, this may block the 14-beta release. Kind regards, Ben. Forwarded Message Subject:[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5197) SQL syntax error in gt-jdbc-postgis PostgisDataStoreOnlineTest Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 23:02:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Ben Caradoc-Davies (JIRA) T

Re: [Geotools-devel] release schedule / blocker

In that case I will update the comment based on your review. -- Jody Garnett On 14 July 2015 at 07:24, Simone Giannecchini < simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > Ciao Jody, > see my other notes. > > The current code does not even resemble the code that is mentioned in > the comment. >

Re: [Geotools-devel] release schedule / blocker

Ciao Jody, see my other notes. The current code does not even resemble the code that is mentioned in the comment. What are you suggesting to do, blindly rewrite? Regards, Simone Giannecchini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == I

Re: [Geotools-devel] release schedule / blocker

Before we next release. On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:12 AM Simone Giannecchini < simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > Btw, > if you check history that code has been _heavily_ rewritter over time > at least twice: > > -1- to fix it and improve performance > -2- to add support for ROI > -3- t

Re: [Geotools-devel] release schedule / blocker

Btw, if you check history that code has been _heavily_ rewritter over time at least twice: -1- to fix it and improve performance -2- to add support for ROI -3- to improve support for no data At this stage the only thing that really bothers is the comment IMHO, just check the comparison report her

Re: [Geotools-devel] release schedule / blocker

Ciao Jody, what is the timeline for sorting this out? Emanuele is busy these days but I can ping someone else internally about this. Regards, Simone Giannecchini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Simone Giannecchini @simo

Re: [Geotools-devel] release schedule / blocker

We would just rewrite it - it is not long. Or we can not include that module in the release. On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM Jim Hughes wrote: > Jody, > > For the IP issue, if we don't hear back from Emanuele, what options do we > have? Would it be possible to remove the code or would we need a

Re: [Geotools-devel] release schedule / blocker

Jody, For the IP issue, if we don't hear back from Emanuele, what options do we have? Would it be possible to remove the code or would we need a 'clean room' implementation? In the latter case, I haven't seen the function in question (either in the GeoTools or JAI core codebases). Perhaps

[Geotools-devel] release schedule / blocker

I updated the release schedule last week, prior to the Skype meeting. can I ask for a sanity check, and who is available to help with releases over these summer months. I have not heard back from Emanuele about GEOT-5155 LGPL implemen

Re: [Geotools-devel] Release scripts failing to publish on sourceforge

Hi, hum... much to my surprise, the GeoServer release publish one worked. Weird? The command doing the upload appears to be the same as GeoTools: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/build/publish_release.sh#L80 Maybe it was a transient failure? Cheers Andrea -- == GeoServer Profe

  1   2   3   >