On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Niels Charlier ni...@scitus.be wrote:
Jeroen hit the nail on the head... Users want the ability to choose.. but
they also want predictability, I would say the latter is even a
prerequisite for the first. Axis order behaviour and which db system to use
are
...@gmail.com] namens Andrea
Aime [andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it]
*Verzonden:* vrijdag 27 februari 2015 12:55
*Aan:* Niels Charlier; Dries Jeroen
*CC:* Ben Caradoc-Davies; geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Jody
Garnett
*Onderwerp:* Re: [Geotools-devel] axis order blues
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:34 PM
@lists.sourceforge.net; Jody Garnett
Onderwerp: Re: [Geotools-devel] axis order blues
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Niels Charlier
ni...@scitus.bemailto:ni...@scitus.be wrote:
On 27-02-15 11:52, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Niels Charlier
ni...@scitus.bemailto:ni...@scitus.be wrote:
Hmm
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Dries Jeroen jeroen.dr...@vito.be wrote:
Quite a coincidence, I've also been wrestling with axis order last week,
and also found that the documentation did not appear to be correct! The way
I expect it to work is for gt-epsg-wkt to be a drop in replacement for
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Niels Charlier ni...@scitus.be wrote:
Hmm yeah I figured it had something to do with that. Thanks for the
detailed explanation, Ben.
But my question remains: should gt-epsg-wkt be allowed to produce the
wrong CRS in the first place?
As far as I remember
Hmm yeah I figured it had something to do with that. Thanks for the
detailed explanation, Ben.
But my question remains: should gt-epsg-wkt be allowed to produce the
wrong CRS in the first place?
Should it perhaps not be completely removed from all dependencies and
replaced by better
On 27-02-15 11:52, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Niels Charlier ni...@scitus.be
mailto:ni...@scitus.be wrote:
Hmm yeah I figured it had something to do with that. Thanks for the
detailed explanation, Ben.
But my question remains: should gt-epsg-wkt be
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Niels Charlier ni...@scitus.be wrote:
On 27-02-15 11:52, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Niels Charlier ni...@scitus.be wrote:
Hmm yeah I figured it had something to do with that. Thanks for the
detailed explanation, Ben.
But my
Hi,
Okay, so according to the geotools documentation CRSes with full URI
specification don't suffer from axis order confusions. But I have the
following SRS used in a test:
urn:x-ogc:def:crs:EPSG:6.11.2:26713
And here's the thing: when running the test in maven, this is
North-East, when
Niels,
I will answer your first question. You are right: this is a classpath
difference. The cause is that Maven and Eclipse have different
dependency models. Eclipse has no notion of a phase (compile versus
test) and no way to exclude transitive dependencies (so test
dependencies of other
10 matches
Mail list logo
