Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget priorities

Just to wrap up this thread, as geotools project officer I am going to send an email to the treasurer authorizing payment as soon as we have a signed contract with the selected party. Because we are approaching year end this would in effect being paying upfront. -- Jody Garnett On Tue, 5 Nov 201

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget priorities

On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 9:26 AM Ian Turton wrote: > Probably the best use of funds this year, I don't think it is enough to > replace the mismash of xml technologies. > Hmm... a rewrite of XML techs with something would not be feasible if we had 10 times more funding I think. I think realisticall

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget priorities

Probably the best use of funds this year, I don't think it is enough to replace the mismash of xml technologies. +1 Ian On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 21:49, Jody Garnett wrote: > It seems my email was taken as a motion, that is fine by me and I will add > my +1 > -- > Jody Garnett > > > On Fri, 25 Oct

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget priorities

It seems my email was taken as a motion, that is fine by me and I will add my +1 -- Jody Garnett On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 at 14:49, Torben Barsballe wrote: > +1 from me. > > Cheers, > Torben > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 8:58 AM Nuno Oliveira GeoSolutions < > nuno.olive...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > >

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget priorities

+1 from me. Cheers, Torben On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 8:58 AM Nuno Oliveira GeoSolutions < nuno.olive...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:43 PM Andrea Aime > wrote: > >> Yep, sounds like a good idea to me, indeed all CITE tests end up using >> mostly GeoTools code, >> Ge

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget priorities

+1 On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:43 PM Andrea Aime wrote: > Yep, sounds like a good idea to me, indeed all CITE tests end up using > mostly GeoTools code, > GeoServer is providing mostly "glue" but the heavy lifting is done via the > GeoTools libraries > > Cheers > Andrea > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget priorities

Yep, sounds like a good idea to me, indeed all CITE tests end up using mostly GeoTools code, GeoServer is providing mostly "glue" but the heavy lifting is done via the GeoTools libraries Cheers Andrea On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 9:37 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > GeoTools made a request for the default

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget priorities

+1 here Regards, Simone Giannecchini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information. == Ing. Simone Giannecchini @simogeo Founder/Director GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax:

[Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget priorities

GeoTools made a request for the default OSGeo budget of $2000 as we had no specific RnD goals or challenges to address this year. How do the GeoTools PMC members feel about offering some support to the GeoServer CITE testing activity? We do indirectly benefit from additional test coverage (althoug

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget

Thanks Andrea, I have updated the draft budget accordingly. On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 12:58 AM Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Jody, > I don't think we're missing ideas, but it would pile up to too many > sprints... asking companies to participate to > more than one week long code sprint a year is too muc

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget

Hi Jody, I don't think we're missing ideas, but it would pile up to too many sprints... asking companies to participate to more than one week long code sprint a year is too much imho (unless the companies involved live large or have very little work to do anyways...) Cheers Andrea On Fri, Jan 18,

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget

Unless anything changes in this thread I will just indicate to the board we are happy with the default 2,000 USD "operational" budget for the committee. Seriously if anyone has an RnD or community building idea that we could help nudge along with some funding please speak up as this is a good oppo

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget

Same here. On Wed, 2019-01-16 at 12:12 +0100, Simone Giannecchini wrote: > same line here > > Regards, > Simone Giannecchini > == > GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! > Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. > == > Ing. Simone Giannecchini > @simogeo > Founder/Director >

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget

same line here Regards, Simone Giannecchini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Simone Giannecchini @simogeo Founder/Director GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax:

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget

I think I would need a lot of convincing to support this idea. Is there really any evidence of LGPL putting people off? Ian On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 08:46, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 11:14 PM Jody Garnett > wrote: > >> - The idea has also come up (with restriction Apache projec

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget

On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 11:14 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > - The idea has also come up (with restriction Apache projects have in > using LGPL) to relicense the library. I think the vast majority of the code > base is covered under our code contribution agreement, and could just be > relicensed. There

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget

So the OSGeo board is proposing 2k as a starting point for each project ... can I can confirm this is good for GeoTools? As for GeoTools plans: - The 2k above should be fine to respond to anything that comes up during the year, I assume we will have a member attending the AGM already who can speak

[Geotools-devel] geotools 2019 budget

We made some use of our budget in 2018 , any priorities for this upcoming year? -- Jody Garnett Dear OSGeo project members, > Over the previous years, OSGeo has been proud to support a growing > number of project events, such