Andrea Aime wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
>> I have been working through some jdbc-ng issues lately in an effort
>> move it to supported. There are currently two critical bugs outstanding:
>>
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2488
>>
>> Has a patch, but it needs work.
>
> Oh, if my
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
>> I would say, move the current jdbc to unsupported/jdbc-legacy?
>> Otherwise we end up with two gt-jdbc jars and break up the
>> binary distribution, which is a flat list of jars
>> (the the second going in will overwrite the first).
>> Alternatively, we need some ot
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Another to probably mention is that we probably don't want to move all
> of the modules over just yet. For instance mysql and sqlserver don't use
> spatial indexing as of yet, so until they do they probably are not ready
> for prime time, so we could just keep the
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Good point about unsupported/jdbc - we do not want to change the
> module name. We should leave the implementations that are not ready
> yet where they are.
>
> Slightly off topic (I saw Andrea mention this on the user emaillist).
> One of the tasks associated with movin
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> I have been working through some jdbc-ng issues lately in an effort move
> it to supported. There are currently two critical bugs outstanding:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2488
>
> Has a patch, but it needs work.
Oh, if my understanding of that is cor
Good point about unsupported/jdbc - we do not want to change the
module name. We should leave the implementations that are not ready
yet where they are.
Slightly off topic (I saw Andrea mention this on the user emaillist).
One of the tasks associated with moving a module to supported is
running it
Another to probably mention is that we probably don't want to move all
of the modules over just yet. For instance mysql and sqlserver don't use
spatial indexing as of yet, so until they do they probably are not ready
for prime time, so we could just keep them in unsupported for the time
being.
Jody Garnett wrote:
> Hi Justin:
>
> The plan sounds fine - and congradulations :-)
>
>> My question is where to put the individual bits. Here is what I had in mind:
>> * Move the contents of unsupported/jdbc-ng/jdbc-core into library/jdbc
>> * Move the plugins from unsupported/jdbc-ng/* to plugi
Hi Justin:
The plan sounds fine - and congradulations :-)
> My question is where to put the individual bits. Here is what I had in mind:
> * Move the contents of unsupported/jdbc-ng/jdbc-core into library/jdbc
> * Move the plugins from unsupported/jdbc-ng/* to plugin/jdbc/*
> * Move the old jdbc
I have been working through some jdbc-ng issues lately in an effort move
it to supported. There are currently two critical bugs outstanding:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2488
Has a patch, but it needs work.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2231
This one has a patch awaiting review
10 matches
Mail list logo
