Dinkypumpinkin and the rest of the crew who work or have worked on updating
and improving get_iplayer and it's plugins (rtmp dump etc)
A big thank you for all your hard work, it is much appreciated by me and
I'm sure by countless others too.
A special Thanks to Phil Lewis for his wor
Thank you to everyone involved for fixing get_iplayer, I can now get
back to downloading CBeebies for my little ones to watch over and over
again.
Is there a donation link anywhere? I'd like to buy you all a drink.
Charles
--
Charles Ho
Just joined the list to say a *BIG* thank you to the maintainers for getting
the search/PVR functionality back into get_iplayer so quickly.
When get_iplayer --pvr failed to work the other day and I saw the message in
tv.cache I thought that was it. B-( Using the pid or URL method worked but
At the risk of irritating with noise, i'll say it anyway: MANY thanks
for keeping this app going!
___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer
On 18 February 2013 00:23, Peter S Kirk wrote:
> Dinkypumpinkin and the rest of the crew who work or have worked on updating
> and improving get_iplayer and it's plugins (rtmp dump etc)
>
> A big thank you for all your hard work, it is much appreciated by me and
> I'm sur
On 18/02/2013 09:25, Colin Law wrote:
On 18 February 2013 00:23, Peter S Kirk wrote:
Dinkypumpinkin and the rest of the crew who work or have worked on updating
and improving get_iplayer and it's plugins (rtmp dump etc)
A big thank you for all your hard work, it is much appreciated by m
;> and improving get_iplayer and it's plugins (rtmp dump etc)
>>>
>>> A big thank you for all your hard work, it is much appreciated by me and
>>> I'm sure by countless others too.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Colin
>
> +9000! G
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Holding"
To:
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 7:27 PM
Subject: Thank You
Thank you to everyone involved for fixing get_iplayer, I can now get
back to downloading CBeebies for my little ones to watch over and
over
again.
Is there
On 03/11/2014 19:43, Don Grunbaum wrote:
Having installed 2.90 the PVR works, but for some reason this weekend's
F1 programmes are missing. I have downloaded the using the PID and CLI,
Fixed in Git for next release. If you want it now:
https://github.com/dinkypumpkin/get_iplayer/wiki/installa
- Original Message -
From: "dinkypumpkin"
To:
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: Thank You
On 03/11/2014 19:43, Don Grunbaum wrote:
Having installed 2.90 the PVR works, but for some reason this
weekend's
F1 programmes are missing. I have downloade
On 03/11/14 19:27, Charles Holding wrote:
Thank you to everyone involved for fixing get_iplayer, I can now get
back to downloading CBeebies for my little ones to watch over and over
again.
Is there a donation link anywhere? I'd like to buy you all a drink.
Charles
My thought too.
B
On 3 Nov 2014 at 20:57, Don Grunbaum Don Grunbaum
wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "dinkypumpkin"> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 8:43 PM
> Subject: Re: Thank You
>
> > On 03/11/2014 19:43, Don Grunbaum wrote:
> >> Having instal
On 4 November 2014 01:51, Peter S Kirk wrote:
> Email a complaint to the "Ministry of Fun" aka
Incredibly ill-though out idea.
> regarding:
>
> 1. The double speak in:
> "...designed to clamp down on clients such as XBMC or get_iplayer, which
> allow programmes to be watched or recorded."
> "Th
On 04/11/14 01:51, Peter S Kirk wrote:
After all, GiP is no different from the old method of recording TV to VCR
or Radio to cassette tape.
Isn't that the point, by using GIP we are only using another type of
recording device to record content from the BBC. I could buy a DigitalTV
today, connec
I'm amazed at these discussions.
The issue for the BBC is one of the protection of intellectual property.
Yes, the problem has been around since recording devices became
available but since the advent of digital technology it has spiralled
out of all belief as a problem to the copyright holder
On 04/11/14 09:54, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
I'm amazed at these discussions.
The issue for the BBC is one of the protection of intellectual property.
Yes, the problem has been around since recording devices became
available but since the advent of digital technology it has spiralled
out of all beli
On 4 November 2014 09:54, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
>
> ...The BBC
> is sitting on a massive treasure trove. What makes anyone think they will
> give this up willingly. Ignoring the technical limitations of the BBC
> iPlayer, the BBC lets us "enjoy" THEIR content for a limited period. What we
> have w
I have to agree with Alan. Any protests will fall on deaf ears and may
even make more likely that it will be locked down further. If you have
a Smart TV or other device with built in iPlayer, then you could
complain to the manufacture and the BBC. But do not mention
get_iplayer.
Again many many th
On 04/11/2014 10:09, Tom wrote:
The mistake you and they are making is that it can somehow be
protected and so is worth a fortune. It cant and so it isn't. As you
say they could shut down GIP today but that would not stop anything
they broadcast or make available appearing on 'pirate' sites imm
Alan Milewczyk wrote:
> Digital gives us the unprecedented ability to make a perfect copy, not a
> lossy copy as with tape ...
But it's a perfect copy of an imperfect (compressed, loss of detail etc)
source
I'd think they'd be more concerned about digital tv recorders where what's
recorded
LOL, try arguing that in a court of law! ;-)
On 04/11/2014 10:25, Colin Law wrote:
On 4 November 2014 09:54, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
...The BBC
is sitting on a massive treasure trove. What makes anyone think they will
give this up willingly. Ignoring the technical limitations of the BBC
iPlayer,
On 4 November 2014 11:01, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
> LOL, try arguing that in a court of law! ;-)
I don't see what is LOL about it, and no court is going to disagree
with the statement that the BBC belongs to the State.
Colin
>
>
> On 04/11/2014 10:25, Colin Law wrote:
>>
>> On 4 November 2014 09:
But they will certainly disagree that their content belongs to you and
that you have unfettered rights over it. That's what the LOL was for!
A
On 04/11/2014 11:11, Colin Law wrote:
On 4 November 2014 11:01, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
LOL, try arguing that in a court of law! ;-)
I don't see what
On 4 November 2014 11:18, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
> But they will certainly disagree that their content belongs to you and that
> you have unfettered rights over it. That's what the LOL was for!
I did not say it belongs to me, I said it belongs to the British
people. Also I did not say we had unfe
On 11/04/2014 09:54 AM, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
We've seen how the film studios have been clamping down on piracy. The
BBC is sitting on a massive treasure trove. What makes anyone think
they will give this up willingly. Ignoring the technical limitations
of the BBC iPlayer, the BBC lets us "e
Yawn, is this the 5 minute argument or the full half hour?
On 04/11/2014 11:33, Colin Law wrote:
On 4 November 2014 11:18, Alan Milewczyk wrote:
But they will certainly disagree that their content belongs to you and that
you have unfettered rights over it. That's what the LOL was for!
I did n
On 04/11/14 12:54, Ian Stirling wrote:
... - so I typically have to try to download several times - and I
can't do this with my linux PC.
I was able to do this on my Ubuntu Linux system using the older get_iplayer.
I was once prompted to use the --force option whan wanting to download a
prog
On 11/04/2014 01:25 PM, Welshmike wrote:
On 04/11/14 12:54, Ian Stirling wrote:
... - so I typically have to try to download several times - and I
can't do this with my linux PC.
I was able to do this on my Ubuntu Linux system using the older
get_iplayer.
I was once prompted to use the --fo
On 4 November 2014 13:49, Ian Tomkinson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Colin Law wrote:
>>
>>
>> I did not say it belongs to me, I said it belongs to the British
>> people. Also I did not say we had unfettered rights, I pointed out
>> that copyright and royalty issues prevent that.
>
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 09:54:47 +
Alan Milewczyk wrote:
> I'm amazed at these discussions.
I wonder how many BBC people are actually subscribed to the list. And
I'm not angling for a list admin to look, it is private. But there's
gotta be some lovies watching, at least :)
>
> The issue for th
I don't disagree with anything you say, Nick. I'm just taking the
devil's advocate position from the viewpoint of film studios, BBC etc
etc, i.e. the media producers.
But yes, we currently have an untenable King Canute situation - the
waves of technology have been destroying previous generatio
Nick wrote:
> Which is the irony of the enforcement of OTT IP. The restrictions won't
> ever truly work - even with some closed network, server and client system
> the end-user could still video the screen. And how much is a phone these
> days that can video something? :)
In the 1990s the pro-au
to dinkypumpkin for all that hard work.
What i don't get (and maybe someone can enlighten me here) is that there
appears to be a number of BBC-sanctioned clients other than iPlayer
itself which have needed to be patched and in some cases have,
successfully. How? Would it be a question of resorting
Wonderful restoration of get_iplayer - thank you. All works well -
even the Cache Refreshes fly. BTW I'm using Windows PVR Manager. Only
small point is that at the end of a record there are hundreds of these
- which slows down the Run PVR:
size= 116kB time=00:00:07.39 bitrate= 129.0kb
Charles Johnson wrote
to dinkypumpkin for all that hard work.
And from here - thank you.
--
Richard
___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer
On 7 Nov 2014, at 13:21, CJB wrote:
Only
small point is that at the end of a record there are hundreds of these
- which slows down the Run PVR:
size= 116kB time=00:00:07.39 bitrate= 129.0kbits/s
size= 163kB time=00:00:10.34 bitrate= 128.7kbits/s
Aren't those the transcoding rate indic
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 14:12:27 +, SquarePenguin wrote:
>> Only small point is that at the end of a record there are hundreds of
>> these - which slows down the Run PVR:
>>
>> size= 116kB time=00:00:07.39 bitrate= 129.0kbits/s
>> size= 163kB time=00:00:10.34 bitrate= 128.7kbits/s
>
> Ar
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 16:45:57 + (GMT)
"Dave Liquorice" wrote:
> I run get_iplayer on Raspberry-Pi and the bit rate shown during
> transcoding a HD download is normally around 2500kbits/sec which I
> have always taken to be the bitrate of the resultant stream. It also
> reports a "fps" which no
On Fri Nov 7 14:12:27 GMT 2014, SquarePenguin wrote:
After download it transcodes
(I think that's the right word) the flv to mp4
With respect SP, "transcodes" refers to change
of video and/or audio codec (from one codec to
another codec - this involves decoding the first
codec and encode wi
On 7 Nov 2014 at 14:12, SquarePenguin SquarePenguin
wrote:
> On 7 Nov 2014, at 13:21, CJB wrote:
>
> > Only
> > small point is that at the end of a record there are hundreds of these
> > - which slows down the Run PVR:
> >
> > size= 116kB time=00:00:07.39 bitrate= 129.0kbits/s
> > size=
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 22:48:06 +0200
"Vangelis forthnet" wrote:
> On Fri Nov 7 14:12:27 GMT 2014, SquarePenguin wrote:
>
> > After download it transcodes
> > (I think that's the right word) the flv to mp4
>
> With respect SP, "transcodes" refers to change
> of video and/or audio codec (from one
On Fri Nov 7 21:16:37 GMT 2014, SquarePenguin wrote:
I'm conflating terms and mixing up file types and all sorts.
(snip)
I can never remember which one means what
There's not much to it, really...
A container is a file format that "contains" (elementary)
audio and/or video streams (it is poss
...for restoring normal service, you've no idea how much it is appreciated.
Thank you again
Alan
___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer
___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer
44 matches
Mail list logo
