George Colpitts writes:
> installs fine on mac but cabal install vector fails on primitive, looks to
> me like gmp library is not provided
>
I have built a new OS X binary [1] which should be linked against the
in-tree libgmp, fixing this issue (which we've been
Maybe put this all on a ticket?
Everyone: would someone like to dig into this? I’m so under water that I just
can’t
Simon
From: Jan Bracker [mailto:jan.brac...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 15 January 2016 14:03
To: Simon Peyton Jones
Cc: Richard Eisenberg
Hi,
SPARC/Solaris 11.2 build:
https://app.box.com/s/lktjbjtnqv39pil4pkkni4xpn5mi2053
Its signature: https://app.box.com/s/catr69sepivx5xb0g5totl2y6hwrznpj
Signatures of already sent files:
i386/solaris: https://app.box.com/s/it4pih3bi6bq02mfqmnnae13sk7gebb4
amd64/solaris:
I have condensed a self-contained plugin and an example application that
reproduces the error. You can find it here:
https://github.com/jbracker/polymonad-plugin/tree/master/examples/core-error
You just have to download the three files and run "cabal install" to
reproduce the error. There is a
I have created Ticket #11435.
I am still not sure if I am producing incorrect evidence or if there really
is an issue with GHC, but I would expect GHC to tell me if the evidence I
produced does not make sense.
[1] https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/11435
2016-01-15 14:15 GMT+00:00 Simon
It seems that Phab is once again failing to apply patches (eg. D1778, which
built perfectly fine
until latest update). Is anyone else experiencing this?
Janek
---
Politechnika Łódzka
Lodz University of Technology
Treść tej wiadomości zawiera informacje przeznaczone tylko dla adresata.
Jeżeli
"Unable to apply patch!" means just that. Harbormaster is unable to apply
the patch (to master). You can test it yourself by running 'arc patch
--nobranch D1778` on an up-to-date checkout of the master branch, and it
will fail in the same way.
Solution: rebase your patch onto master, and update
Somehow I always I believed that Harbormaster does not apply a patch onto
master but onto the
revision it was created from. Has there been any change in this behaviour
recently?
Janek
Dnia piątek, 15 stycznia 2016, Thomas Miedema napisał:
> "Unable to apply patch!" means just that.
Karel Gardas writes:
> Hi,
>
Hi Karel,
In the future do you suppose you could just tar these up and post the
tarball? box.com is a bit annoying to download files from.
Cheers,
- Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Jan Bracker
wrote:
> You just have to download the three files and run "cabal install" to
> reproduce the error.
>
It's never that easy, is it? Can you try in a cabal sandbox, with
ghc-7.10.3. I'm getting:
cabal: Could not resolve
Hard-coding the exact base version was a stupid mistake, sorry. I relaxed
that and reattached a new version of the files to the ticket.
It seems that 'effect-monad's dependency on 'type-level-sets' is a bit to
liberal, because the module structure and exports of that package changed
between
I can reproduce the problem with 7.10.3. Since the compiler got completely
rewritten, the plugin for sure doesn't work with 8.0.
In case anyone else wants to take look at this bug, I can say the plugin
contains a lot of hopefully helpful comments.
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Jan Bracker
Karel Gardas writes:
> Hi,
>
> I've build two builds for Solaris 11.2:
>
> i386: https://app.box.com/s/1m75kzunzsz6bqh77py5517t39734446
> amd64: https://app.box.com/s/y583zs1tqduz8lbppt66z1qlxms0vytg
>
> Both binary distributions support shared libraries and use system
13 matches
Mail list logo