Thanks, this is all great news
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021, 21:56 Ben Gamari wrote:
> ÉRDI Gergő writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm seeing three build failures in CI:
> >
> Hi,
>
> > 1. On perf-nofib, it fails with:
> >
> Don't worry about this one for the moment. This job is marked as
> accepting of failu
ÉRDI Gergő writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing three build failures in CI:
>
Hi,
> 1. On perf-nofib, it fails with:
>
Don't worry about this one for the moment. This job is marked as
accepting of failure for a reason (hence the job state being an orange
exclamation mark rather than a red X).
> == make
The other two are resilient to restarts.
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021, 18:49 Moritz Angermann
wrote:
> You can safely ignore the x86_64-darwin failure. I can get you the juicy
> details over a beverage some time. It boils down to some odd behavior using
> rosetta2 on AArch64 Mac mini’s to build x86_64 G
You can safely ignore the x86_64-darwin failure. I can get you the juicy
details over a beverage some time. It boils down to some odd behavior using
rosetta2 on AArch64 Mac mini’s to build x86_64 GHCs. There is a fix
somewhere from Ben, so it’s just a question of time until it’s properly
fixed.
Th
Hi,
I'm seeing three build failures in CI:
1. On perf-nofib, it fails with:
== make boot -j --jobserver-fds=3,4 --no-print-directory;
in /builds/cactus/ghc/nofib/real/smallpt
/builds/cactus/ghc/ghc/bin/ghc -M -dep-suffix
