Your script is
Perfect Raphaël !
I've other questions:
1) When i run the script, i've a gimp window with the image created.
I want to close it before leaving the script,
I've done a (gimp-delete-image img) BUIT WITH NO effects.
2) Can i activate gimp with no visual interface at all
Hi,
writes:
> Well, I must admit that I am not really keen on working on gimp-perl in
> gimp-cvs anymore, anyways. The continuous mobbing made the air somewhat
> bigheaded up there.
Marc, there has been no mobbing going on (despite your continous
ranting perhaps). There are two reasons for movi
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 01:02:48 +0100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 02:04:51PM +0100, Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - Gimp-Perl is broken and is not maintained
>
> Well, I don't know of anything like "gimp-perl is broken". I think that
>
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 01:06:41AM -0500, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2003-02-28 at 0102.48 +0100, Marc A. Lehmann typed this:
> >
> > I really wonder what is going on here, but there is a great deal of
> > confusion and misinformation going on...
> >
> i miss the perl plug-ins
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 01:53:59PM +0100, Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even if the problems were only due to the build/install process, I
> think that it would be appropriate to say that "gimp-perl is broken".
> The result is that it is not possible for some users to use gimp-perl.
>
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 11:12:57AM +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marc, there has been no mobbing going on (despite your continous
Just about every of your mails you wrote that has anything to do with
gimp-perl contains some (usually little) amounts of FUD. It might not be
intent
Hi,
writes:
> > (2) There are a couple of severe problems with the build that have
>
> I didn't know this (but I don't use the bugtracker, since despite a lot of
> tries I never got an account there, so it's rather useless for me).
it seems we suffer from the same problem: I've told you about
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 06:07:22PM +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> writes:
>
> > > (2) There are a couple of severe problems with the build that have
> >
> > I didn't know this (but I don't use the bugtracker, since despite a lot of
> > tries I never got an account ther
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:19:01 +0100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> wrote:
> > (2) There are a couple of severe problems with the build that have
>
> I didn't know this (but I don't use the bugtracker, since despite a lot of
> tries I never got an account there, so it's rather useless
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:52:18 +0100, Valter Mazzola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your script is
> Perfect Raphaël !
Thanks!
> I've other questions:
> 1) When i run the script, i've a gimp window with the image created.
>I want to close it before leaving the script,
>I've done a (gimp-de
Hi,
writes:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20052
>
> This bug report is rather outdated and supposedly fixed since MANY years.
Now closed at your request.
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35694
>
> Same issue here.
Same here.
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:11:46 +0100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 01:53:59PM +0100, Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Even if the problems were only due to the build/install process, I
> > think that it would be appropriate to say that "gim
On 28 Feb 2003, at 18:35, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:19:01 +0100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.)
> (Lehmann )> wrote: > > (2) There are a couple of severe problems with
> the build that have > > I didn't know this (but I don't use the
> bugtracker, since despite a lot of > tri
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 08:05:04PM +0100, Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please don't call this rethorics - if you do, you are measuring different
things differently, which is not at all fair.
> this discussion on the developers' mailing list so I would expect that
> most subscribers c
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 06:35:26PM +0100, Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Strange. I had no problem creating an account some time ago:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/createaccount.cgi
Well, I registered a long time ago (I think under a differrent URL). The
problem is:
> then you shoul
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 08:30:09PM +0100, Branko Collin wrote:
>
> I vaguely remember that Bugzilla needed JavaScript or Cookies or some
> other extra technology to be enabled before you could use it. It's
> not set-up very well.
Just another FUD example.
You don't need JS (though it may improve
On 2003-02-26 at 1956.05 +0100, Sven Neumann typed this:
> Hi,
>
> when I saw your mail, I remembered that I haven't yet told you that we
> finally moved gimp-perl out of the gimp HEAD branch into its own CVS
> module called gimp-perl. Hoepfully someone will find the time to
> resurrect its functi
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 07:30:35PM +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79751
> >
> I certainly did; I even added your email to the Cc: which should have
> caused bugzilla to send you an email about it.
Hmm.. well, then it was as I said
Sorry for this off-topic posting, but Robin Rowe actually is on this list
and had a question.
From: "Robin Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I tried to reply to your mail, but it seems you cannot receive e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from remote mailer after end of data:
host mail.movie
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:07:30PM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 09:19:17PM +0100, "David Necas (Yeti)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > You need cookies to log in, so you generally need cookies to
> > change anything (what brower do you use? bugzilla works even
> > in
On 26 Feb 2003 17:29:37 +0100
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ernst Lippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The point is the following. In the current implementation the preview
> > widget consists of the following components from top to bottom: the image,
> > the progress bar
> It's OT, but you started about reality:
I didn't start anything. A very important rule to follow on the 'net or
anywhere else: do _NOT_ forward private mails to public forums.
;)
> bugzilla.gnome.org, then I can't understand why you bother
> to read any mail not signed by some trusted GnuPG ke
Gimp-Print 4.3.11, released February 28, 2003, is a development release of
this package.
Gimp-Print is a suite of printer drivers that may be used with most
common UNIX print spooling systems, including CUPS, lpr, LPRng, or
others. These drivers provide high quality printing for UNIX
(including M
fre 2003-02-28 klockan 18.28 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79751
>
> Oops, this is certainly not something you told me about ever.
The "bug activity" log for this report (available as a link from the
page) very clearly shows that [EMAIL PROTECTED] added
24 matches
Mail list logo
