Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 06:35 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>
>> It would also be nice to get the Polygonal Select Tool details sorted
>> out for 2.6. There is code for such a tool in bug #119646 [1], the
>> question is just to what extent it should be merged/integrat
Hi Ettore.
Ettore Pasquini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I work for 3Dconnexion (a Logitech company) and we make 3D input devices.
> We also care about popular 2D apps that could use the high sensitivity of
> our SpaceNavigator for panning and zooming. GIMP was under our radar and
> now we are con
Hello everyone,
I work for 3Dconnexion (a Logitech company) and we make 3D input devices.
We also care about popular 2D apps that could use the high sensitivity of
our SpaceNavigator for panning and zooming. GIMP was under our radar and
now we are considering to add support for our devices.
I am
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 23:50 +1030, David Gowers wrote:
[...]
> What significant sequence of actions that you can take is there, that
> cannot be done by simple graph editing?
You might want to look at the "nip2" graphics editor, which
works this way. I find nip2 hard to use despite (or maybe
beca
On Jan 26, 2008 12:53 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008 4:54 PM, David Gowers wrote:
>
> > In short -- what you call 'action recording', I call 'packaging up a
> > chunk of the undo stack'. Really, your 'start' and 'stop' actions
> > would be trivial to implemen
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 20:03 +, William Skaggs wrote:
> > I think it would be a lot more useful if we would just collect a list of
> > tasks that we consider important, without sticking them into a
> > particular release time-frame. That will make it easier for new
> > developers to partic
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Well, we have that for 2.6. We didn't put publish it. But we discussed
> these points and agreed on a roadmap for 2.6. The question is, do we
> gain anything if we published such a roadmap officially? I am afraid
> that the only result would be that people w
On Jan 25, 2008 10:06 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> I think it would be a lot more useful if we would just collect a list of
> tasks that we consider important, without sticking them into a
> particular release time-frame.
This is what Inkscape guys do. They have a roadmap based on a rough
estimation
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 16:54 +, William Skaggs wrote:
> A roadmap should be thought of as a component of a full development
> strategy. In my view, each release cycle should have a set of target
> dates, and a set of essential accomplishments.
Well, we have that for 2.6. We didn't put p
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:21 +, William Skaggs wrote:
> The idea I was responding to was, as I understood it, basically to have
> multiple PangoLayouts within the same layer. Even that would probably
> not be so difficult to implement, but I think it would probably cause more
> harm than
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 14:22 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> > Actually, I don't think that we need to put action recording on our list
> > as that will become obsolete with non-destructive editing.
>
> This is apples and oranges, Sven :-)
Well, it is not the same thing, that is right.
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 8. improve the text tool
>
> Evaluation: Most of the points mentioned here would be relatively
> simple to implement. One of them -- the ability to have multiple
> text items within a single layer -- might not be simple, and it should
> be considered w
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Perhaps if we could first decide what the purpose of the roadmap/task
> list should be. I tried to raise that question when we started with this
> topic. But no one ever attempted to answer it. So before we start this
> again, can we have this discussion, pl
On Jan 25, 2008 4:54 PM, David Gowers wrote:
> In short -- what you call 'action recording', I call 'packaging up a
> chunk of the undo stack'. Really, your 'start' and 'stop' actions
> would be trivial to implement:
> mark the start location in undo stack; mark the end; and prompt the
> user for
On Jan 26, 2008 12:09 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008 4:20 PM, David Gowers wrote:
>
> > What significant sequence of actions that you can take is there, that
> > cannot be done by simple graph editing?
>
> Users do not think in terms of graphs, they think in t
On Jan 25, 2008 4:20 PM, David Gowers wrote:
> What significant sequence of actions that you can take is there, that
> cannot be done by simple graph editing?
Users do not think in terms of graphs, they think in terms of actions
and sequences of actions. They want to click Record, mess around wit
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:50:56 +1030
From: "David Gowers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Jan 25, 2008 9:52 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
> All the users who ever bugged you asking for macros
> recording did it because they don't feel like programmers to learn
> Script/Python/Perl-Fu.
Wi
Hi Alexandre,
On Jan 25, 2008 9:52 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008 11:01 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> > Actually, I don't think that we need to put action recording on our list
> > as that will become obsolete with non-destructive editing.
>
> This is apples an
On Jan 25, 2008 11:01 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Actually, I don't think that we need to put action recording on our list
> as that will become obsolete with non-destructive editing.
This is apples and oranges, Sven :-) Non-destructive editing boosts
productivity as well, but has nothing (or very
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 11:48 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> Well, there _had been_ a beta version of the list (to which several
> people including myself contributed) and since then nothing has
> happened, so I was wondering if you still liked that idea ;-)
I did not like any of the bet
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 20:20 +0100, peter sikking wrote:
> Even before 2.4 came out, I was warned that not to much UI
> work could be done for 2.6. GEGL first. OK. suits me, that
> leaves a period where the UI analysis can get (finally!) done
> and a transition can be made towards tackling the
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 04:38 +, William Skaggs wrote:
> 8. improve the text tool
>
> Evaluation: Most of the points mentioned here would be relatively
> simple to implement. One of them -- the ability to have multiple
> text items within a single layer -- might not be simple, and it sho
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 18:06 +, William Skaggs wrote:
> * Construct an optional MDI version of the gui.
That is definitely not a goal. We are not willing nor able to maintain
optional user interfaces. The UI has to evolve and it will be highly
customizable, but we are not going to offer a
23 matches
Mail list logo
