On 03/08/2011 07:50 PM, Bogdan Szczurek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Bogdan Szczurekthebod...@gmail.com
wrote:
I also have high hopes for GEGL, but I'd rather have it use some
more abstract color model for that. I know it's not so simple—maybe
even undoable–that way, but I do like
Hi everyone,
As you all know, getting 2.8 out is highest priority right now. There
are however some things that we want to fix before we make a 3.0
release. Thus, we must plan for a 2.10 release.
I have updated our milestones in bugzilla with this. After the update,
there are only 7 bugs on
On 03/14/2011 11:59 AM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
Hi,
This decision, as I see it, change the release date from within
months to within some weeks -
May I ask for the calculations that led you to the conclusion that we
are weeks away from a release? I haven't done the math yet, but I still
On 03/15/2011 10:44 AM, Jon Nordby wrote:
On 15 March 2011 07:43, Martin Nordholtsense...@gmail.com wrote:
Not including API to work with layer groups in Python is not a
regression, it's just missing functionality in one of the scripting
languages. It is unfortunate if GIMP 2.8 will be
On 03/15/2011 12:35 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
Scripts which previously interated through layers are currently not
working. That is a regression.
It sure sounds like one, please file a bug report and put it on the 2.8
milestone with a scripts that allows the regression to be easily
On 03/15/2011 02:12 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
Hi,
This decision, as I see it, change the release date from within
months to within some weeks -
I hope you have in mind that Translators have to know about so they
can update
On 03/15/2011 06:38 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
Speaking of which, I'd love to know what on Earth the reasoning behind
putting https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556884 off the
milestones is supposed to mean
On 03/15/2011 08:47 PM, Charlie De wrote:
Why?? Rupert Weber finished this last September and you promised it would be
in
2.8. Is this how you show respect for the most stellar effort by a new talent?
Shame, truly, shame on you. It's now been 5 years since the issue was first
reported,
2011/3/16 Carol Spears ca...@gimp.org:
martin, if in, oh, lets say 3 days, March 18, 2011 the majority of your list
items are not commited, perhaps you should consider stepping aside.
releases
don't attract developers. look at the history! gimp-1.0 - gimp-1.2, 1997
thru
2000. lots of
2011/3/16 Charlie De charlieco...@yahoo.com:
Martin, with all due respect, your focus in releasing 2.8 ASAP should be on
integrating fixes that are completed, not battling to bring in new
functionality
such as layer groups. What's the point of layer groups if the layer transfer
modes don't
Hi,
I think we should discuss how we make best use of Bugzilla. Except for
tracking bugs, I'd like us to use bugzilla for
a) Keeping track of what is important to fix for a given release
b) Keeping track of what bugs among all our bugs we consider important
to fix, but not more
On 03/22/2011 01:37 AM, Jacek Poplawski wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:30 PM, gespert...@gmail.com
gespert...@gmail.com wrote:
Most of the people ask for CMYK because:
I need CMYK support for photo retouch, to create better colors.
CMYK is no different than LAB, HSV or RGB. It is
On 03/22/2011 08:25 AM, Jacek Poplawski wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:19 AM, SorinNnemes.so...@gmail.com wrote:
Jacek - you don't need CMYK for photos [I need CMYK support for photo
retouch, to create better colors].
I am familiar with this opinion. I don't want to continue offtopic
On 03/22/2011 08:20 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
LAB values
makes colorimetric sense by themselves, without any additional information.
Correction: For CIELAB values to make colorimetric sense, it is
necessary to also know the reference white point.
/ Martin
--
My GIMP Blog:
http
2011/3/22 Jacek Poplawski jacekpoplaw...@gmail.com:
CMYK is also best colorspace for skin color retouch by numbers,
No it isn't, because unless you go through a lot of extra work to
avoid it, colors in the image that the used CMYK color space is unable
to represent will get lost.
/ Martin
--
On 03/25/2011 02:31 PM, LightningIsMyName wrote:
*** Other topics ***
Any other suggestions should be suggested by replying to this email,
or adding it directly to the wiki (if you have permissions to edit the
wiki).
Hi,
What's the status of making wiki.gimp.org resolve to gimp-wiki.who.ee
2011/3/27 Kevin Cozens ke...@ve3syb.ca:
LightningIsMyName wrote:
*** Optional topic: Re-Discussing GIMP's programming language ***
Some developers that weren't present in the last meeting, highly
disagree on the attempt to introduce vala into gimp, claiming that it
will scare off developers
On 03/27/2011 02:12 PM, Michael Natterer wrote:
So when you write code, how much time do you spend writing the
boilerplate? 10%? I would say it's much much less, because writing
the code is a small fraction of the time actually spent on the code,
the rest is debugging, refactoring, reading
2011/3/27 Michael Natterer mi...@gimp.org:
On 03/27/2011 04:45 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
On 03/27/2011 02:12 PM, Michael Natterer wrote:
As to the actual iussue of introducing whatever *additional*
language in GIMP, I strongly doubt that it would help us in
any way. It would increase
2011/3/29 LightningIsMyName lightningismyn...@gmail.com:
** Re-Discussing GIMP's programming language **
For core (non-UI), continue using GObject, use code generators (such
as turbine) and do copy/paste/replace for existing GObject classes
(for the rare case where the generator won't be
On 03/31/2011 02:40 PM, Michael Natterer wrote:
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce that the new GIMP developer wiki
has found its way home and is reachable as wiki.gimp.org now.
That's great! I have removed 'GIMP' from the roadmap title now since the
domain itself has enough GIMP-weight, the
Hi all,
I have created a schedule for GIMP 2.8 and put it here:
http://tasktaste.com/projects/Enselic/gimp-2-8
Please review the list of tasks and let me know if there are other
things than those listed there that you know we need to do before we can
release 2.8. In that case I will add those
On 04/03/2011 10:31 PM, Eric Grivel wrote:
I added a proposed patch to fix Bug 596410 to the bug report a while
ago. Do I need to look at that again?
Nope, I just haven't had time to look at the patch yet
Regards,
Martin
--
My GIMP Blog:
http://www.chromecode.com/
Why GIMP 2.8 is not
Den 3 apr 2011 23:46 skrev Łukasz Czerwiński lc277...@students.mimuw.edu.pl:
I'd like to suggest time profiling as another task to be done before the
release. Once I started to optimize Gimp's startup time (especially scheme
interpreter) and I'd like to return to that task in the near future
On 04/06/2011 06:14 PM, sourav de wrote:
I tried to implement the blur operation in GEGL. The algorithm is same
as of the blur plug-in in GIMP. The patch file for GEGL operation and
the blur.c file for the plug-in are attached below. Kindly let me know
if there is any mistake in my
2011/4/7 Robert Sasu sasu.rob...@gmail.com:
After writing the code reviews I ported the emboss plug-in to gegl. Should I
upload to GIMP bugzilla ?
Yes please, and don't forget to reference the patch in your GSoC 2011
application.
BR,
Martin
___
Hi
Two new items on the 2.8 schedule has been added:
* Bug 647835 - Handle deprecated GTK+ API
* Bug 647834 - Stop using deprecated API in plug-ins
And one item has been fixed:
* Include UI tests in nightly Jenkins builds
The last fixed item means that we run all our tests each night now,
2011/4/15 Kevin Cozens ke...@ve3syb.ca:
Martin Nordholts wrote:
The last fixed item means that we run all our tests each night now,
including UI tests.
Um... ok... How does a buildbot run UI tests?
If the backend is X, you use http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xvfb.
Although it is often more
On 04/15/2011 09:57 AM, Alexia Death wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Martin Nordholtsense...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Two new items on the 2.8 schedule has been added:
* Bug 647835 - Handle deprecated GTK+ API
* Bug 647834 - Stop using deprecated API in plug-ins
And one item has been
Hi,
Now that 2.7.2 has been released and NEWS is up to date (thanks mitch!),
let's make sure to keep it up to date from now on. That means that
whenever you make a commit that is worth being mentioned in NEWS, add it
to NEWS along with the other changes in the commit.
That way making a new
2011/4/27 Enrico Schröder enni.schroe...@gmail.com:
Hi Martin,
thanks for choosing me for the Summer of Code. I will start working on the
specification details of the widget at the end of the week. At the end of
may I have exams, so I hope I can manage to start a little before the
official
2011/5/2 Tim Chen ht.timc...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
Recently we have published a paper on SIGGRAPH 2011 about nonlinear revision
control system for images. You can find the abstract and videos at
https://sites.google.com/site/httimchen/2011_imagesvn
Hi Tim
That's great stuff.
1) is there
2011/5/2 Michael Natterer mi...@gimp.org:
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 17:15 +0200, ense...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
We have discussed the possibility to use Vala as a code
generator. What follows is a set of patches so we all can see what
that would look like. Any objections to me pushing these
2011/5/3 Simon Budig si...@budig.de:
Martin Nordholts (ense...@gmail.com) wrote:
I'm trying hard to find time hacking on GIMP, and not having to waste
time on GObject C boiler plate means a lot to me. At first I was
thinking what the hell, I'll just come up with the the damn
boilerplate code
2011/5/2 Enrico Schröder enni.schroe...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
i've come up with the first concept for the rewrite, including a class
diagram and sequence diagrams for a few use cases:
http://enni.userpage.fu-berlin.de/GimpSizeEntry.pdf
Note that it mainly shows how the different components work
2011/5/3 Tim Chen ht.timc...@gmail.com:
Hi Martin,
It sounds like that there are other thoughts about how to implement the macro
system? During my GIMP hack last year, my impression was that macro recording
should be done in PDB. And I did not do so because not every functions went
2011/5/14 Enrico Schröder enni.schroe...@gmail.com
Hi Martin!
Parsing is done via GimpEevl which is called from the UnitEntry. I think it
makes sense because the entry is responsible for input and output, the
UnitAdjustment holds the value. GimpEevl does not require any UI. Or did you
2011/5/30 Enrico Schröder enni.schroe...@gmail.com:
Martin Nordholts mailto:ense...@gmail.com
30. Mai 2011 11:04
Hi again
How's it going?
Best regards,
Martin
Hi Martin,
sorry for the long pause, finished my exams last week (with moderate
success...) ;)
Been working
is export and not Shrink Wrap, we
can make Ctrl+E be the default keyboard shortcut for both Overwrite
and Export. Until then, I just made a commit so that you can use
Alt+F, W instead at least:
commit 9ae0dc034b7791c15479649f71ef4cda8caaf34e
Author: Martin Nordholts mart...@src.gnome.org
Date: Tue Jun
2011/6/30 Jeremy Morton ad...@game-point.net:
My suggestion is an export (to the
original file name and file type), but with a 'are you sure you want to
overwrite?' dialog before the export happens, with the focus
automatically on the cancel so 'enter' will cancel the export.
The popup is
2011/6/30 peter sikking pe...@mmiworks.net:
I wrote:
I will update the spec now to formalise this.
done, and it was not a one-liner.
Martin (prime suspect for implementing the change): please do
a careful diff in the wiki to see the changes.
It looks straightforward and I expect to be
Export to out of the File menu,
the shortcut of Export to is still active and mapped to invoke Export...
everything else works like before
Thanks for the clarifications, I've made this change now:
commit c73bdc097188a926f01062a009f9f22ff32dad4e
Author: Martin Nordholts mart...@src.gnome.org
Date
2011/7/1 Enrico Schröder enni.schroe...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
during the integration of the new UnitEntry widget into Gimp I came
across the grid editor. At the moment it uses two rows, one for entering
the value in pixels, one for entering it in another unit (cm, inch etc).
Both display the
2011/7/7 GiveLifeCS gabr...@givelifecolorsystem.com:
Hi developers of GIMP
my name is Gabriel Vano
I created a NEW COLOR SYSTEM with 2265 new shades, the color palette is
free for various design software including GIMP. MY QUESTION FOR THE
DEVELOPERS IS:
Someone can help me to get in touch
2011/7/8 GiveLifeCS gabr...@givelifecolorsystem.com:
Hi Martin Nordholts , I will try to explain your questions:
I have invested approx. 4 years to do this color system
It was a very manual I mean, that was without using any type of
mathematical algorithm, but one by one watching
Hi Enrico,
I've made a first review-round of some of your new code. It's not a
complete review, but it's a start. I hope the to-the-point comments
are OK, I don't mean to be rude.
Note that I'm CCing gimp-developer to keep our correspondence public.
I've done the review by diffing origin/master
Hi everyone,
I just went through our GIMP 2.8 schedule at
http://tasktaste.com/projects/Enselic/gimp-2-8 and made some
adjustments and about a month was added to the release date estimate
because of it. I would like to describe the adjustments I did, check
the status of the various tasks, and
2011/7/14 Enrico Schröder enni.schroe...@gmail.com:
Hi
I've adressed most of your comments by now. I have a few comments myself
though, which I wrote directly in the file. I marked them with '##' so you
can search for them.
The file with the comments is to be found here:
2011/7/16 Enrico Schröder enni.schroe...@gmail.com:
Ok, I will define the defines ;-) Should the common ones be declared in
gimpunitentries.h or should each class/file define them themselves when
needed?
Put them in gimpunitentries.h for now. Later we will move
gimpunitentries away from
Hi
Here are my review comments from a rather detailed review round. I've
looked carefully at the GimpUnitAdjustment and GimpUnitEntry APIs, as
I believe we can get the API in a state good enough for inclusion in
the GIMP 2.10 plug-in API (that will also survive into GIMP 3.0).
GimpUnitEntries
Hi,
This is a small update on some changes I have made on our continuous
integration tool Jenkins that is hosted here:
http://gimptest.flamingtext.com:8080/
With the addition of nightly tarball builds of feature branches, in
particular for some of our GSoC projects, there is a new naming
2011/8/2 Michael J. Hammel mjham...@graphics-muse.org:
Gdk-2.0.gir: error: Type reference 'GdkPixbuf' not found
I've built and installed the prerequisites, including gdk-pixbuf,
to /usr/local/gimpgit. I've tried building gobject-introspection but
that doesn't build either. I didn't think
2011/8/1 Enrico Schröder enni.schroe...@gmail.com:
Hey Martin,
just a small status update: starting on documentation and fixing your review
comments now. (Have been busy with moving to my new apartment last week).
By going through your review comments I noticed that your diff file
2011/8/2 Michael Muré batolet...@gmail.com:
#: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagecoefcalc.c:82
#: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagetransform.c:118
msgid A GimpCageConfig object, that define the transformation
For now, this string won't go to the UI, but it might happen in the future,
when gegl will
2011/8/6 Robert Hildebrandt roberts_k...@gmx.de:
Hello Guys,
I love the new singlewindow mode. But there'se still (today fetched,
merged and compiled) got one issue in
the current version:
I like to work with the single Window mode when it's maximized, but
everytime I open a new Image or
2011/8/13 P S psweb...@gmail.com:
This is my first post in gimp-dev so forgive me if I happen to miss
out context or interfere with current work in progress.
It turns out dockables aren't disposed after a gimp_dock_dispose()
call in the current master. gimp_dock_dispose() only removes
2011/8/15 Jeremy Morton ad...@game-point.net:
Speaking of tab in single-window mode, does Ctrl-Tab work for switching
tab yet? If not, is this planned?
Ctrl+Tab will continue to cycle between layers, at least in GIMP 2.8.
/ Martin
--
My GIMP Blog:
http://www.chromecode.com/
Single-window
2011/8/22 Thales Oliveira - WeAreLinux.com tha...@wearelinux.com:
I'm sorry, hasn't it been available for a while? At least I have been using
2.7.3 for months. Great news anyway.
There is lot of confusion regarding this, which is why I think we
should start with GEGL-like version numbering,
2011/8/26 Robert Sasu sasu.rob...@gmail.com:
Hello,
Here is the list of op's I ported (made):
1. Color rotate
2. Color to alpha
3. Convolution matrix
4. Cubism
5. Deinterlace
6. Emboss
7. Fractal-trace
8. Lens correct (with Lensfun library)
9. Lens-distortion
10. Plasma
11.
2011/9/5 Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com:
Hi,
We currently have the new Tool Presets dockable dialog that has zero
factory preset. Maybe we should should opulate it a bit? Some cropping
presets for popular photo paper formats, DVD and whatnot? Steal some
presets for
2011/9/5 Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
This is not something that blocks a 2.8 release and we badly badly
need to make a release. This should wait until after 2.8.
How does it prevent you from releasing 2.8?
Any
2011/9/5 Alexia Death alexiade...@gmail.com:
Since when does adding default resources counts as a feature or
involves significant amount of coding and risk of breakage? I would
agree if this was a coding task. It is not. If it was, there would be
something very wrong with the setup. We sort of
2011/9/5 Alexia Death alexiade...@gmail.com:
Of course, but I see no reason to actively discourage resource changes
at a point when we dont even have a new splash set yet...
Well, the reason we don't have a splash is because nobody had time to
get us one yet. From the point of view of making a
2011/9/5 Michael Schumacher schum...@gmx.de:
I'd like to comment on the blog post, or see comments by someone else, but
I'd like to clarify our plans for Scheme in GIMP first.
If we look at what programming languages that are popular [1], we can
see that the vast majority of languages in use
2011/9/5 Ofnuts ofn...@laposte.net:
On 09/05/2011 07:57 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
If we look at what programming languages that are popular [1], we can
see that the vast majority of languages in use today have a syntax
where 1 + 1 is written 1 + 1 and not (+ 1 1). If we want to have a
main
601 - 665 of 665 matches
Mail list logo
