Ok -
we it can be seen that there are a couple of desired/needed visibility
features when
group layers are in the mix.
Since any native changes to existing behavior could only come in gimp
2.10 (and only them we would have the feedback of lots o people just
as we are having now with 2.8) - this
Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 17:28:53 +0200
From: lis...@jesusda.com
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: [Gimp-developer] Export issues
Another issue appears when open a JPG image, edit it and close.
Instead of saving the image using the same original formt and
parameters, Gimp try to
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 7:28 PM, jEsuSdA 8) wrote:
The firs is about PRESETS. When I export as JPG and I configure the
parameters, then I click on Save prefs, but when I export as JPG a new
image, the presets are lost instead I click on Load prefs button. This is
a uggly thing who made me
Hi,
reading some of the JPEG related articles here I wondered whether GIMP
or GEGL can do lossless rotation and cropping on JPEG images. Can you
tell me more about it?
Thanks,
grafxuser
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 10:12 -0700, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
Very tempted to file this one on GNOME already, but going to check here first
in case I missed something (e.g. is it configurable?) .
When you hide a layer group in GIMP 2.8, all items inside it get a new
eye-with-slash icon to
On 05/27/2012 08:26 PM, gfxuser wrote:
Hi,
reading some of the JPEG related articles here I wondered whether GIMP
or GEGL can do lossless rotation and cropping on JPEG images. Can you
tell me more about it?
Thanks,
grafxuser
For rotation, that would only work on images with dimensions
Nice idea.
I think the slash across the eye serves a purpose: it conceptually
differentiates that icon from the other eye icons, indicating that those
layers are part of a group.
At least for me, the eye-with-slash allows for faster recognition of that
difference.
I did some experimenting with
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Michael Natterer wrote:
On my monitor, your 50% opacity version looks hardly
different from full opacity, and the dithered version
is not exactly obviously different when quickly looked
at it.
I don't see how going from something that is clearly
For a non GIMP solution (with severe constraints on the rotation and
cropping parameters, as is pretty much unavoidable):
http://jpegclub.org/
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Whoops, had a suspicion I was forgetting something on my previous message.
Attached is another mockup illustrating some improved(?) eye icons.
- Right column shows what the icon would look like with the slash trimmed 3px
from each end.
- Second row has the slash lightened by 50% (now grey
Why re-invent the wheel?
Attached are Inkscape's. Very clear.
-Rob A
attachment: 2012-05-27_170115.jpg___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
11 matches
Mail list logo
