Hi,
Matthias Brunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> we have a lot of document scans, all sized 2432x3482 pixels, and
> would like to reduce them to screen size (for example to 682x1000).
> The problem is that the standard scale algorithm renders the document
> unreadable (some text characters ca
Hi,
Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is really weird. I have a PNG image. I tried to make it
> smaller by resizing it down, but instead it got BIGGER. I don't
> understand this at all.
>
> I put the images on the web:
>
> Original: http://www.math.umd.edu/~dcarrera/screenshot
Not that I know.
But maybe, and here I do ask on to the other people on the list,
a hack like this could work:
Pick the scalling tool on gimp, and modify the code in a way that
antialiasing works to darken a pixel (thus spreading a black letter over
to white areas), but preventing it from lighten
Hello,
we have a lot of document scans, all sized 2432x3482 pixels, and
would like to reduce them to screen size (for example to 682x1000).
The problem is that the standard scale algorithm renders the document
unreadable (some text characters can still be recognised, others not
any more).
Is t
--- Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 02:12:22AM +0200, Marco Wessel wrote:
> >
> > My guess is that this is because of the interpolation when resampling.
> > Makes it less easily compressable. (Notice the 'anti-aliased' edges in
> > the resized picture?)
> >
>
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 02:12:22AM +0200, Marco Wessel wrote:
>
> My guess is that this is because of the interpolation when resampling.
> Makes it less easily compressable. (Notice the 'anti-aliased' edges in
> the resized picture?)
>
> Marco Wessel
Any suggestion as to how to fix it?
--
Dani
My guess is that this is because of the interpolation when resampling.
Makes it less easily compressable. (Notice the 'anti-aliased' edges in
the resized picture?)
Marco Wessel
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is really weird. I have a PNG image. I tried to make it s
Hi,
This is really weird. I have a PNG image. I tried to make it smaller by
resizing it down, but instead it got BIGGER. I don't understand this at
all.
I put the images on the web:
Original: http://www.math.umd.edu/~dcarrera/screenshot.png
Resized: http://www.math.umd.edu/~dcarrera/scre
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 12:58:12PM +0200, Matthias Brunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we have a lot of document scans, all sized 2432x3482 pixels, and
and which colour depth?
> The problem is that the standard scale algorithm renders the document
> unreadable (some text characters can still b
I replaced TRACE_ALL with TRACE_CALL.
Regards,
--
Arijit Das
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 22:31, David selby wrote:
> However if I draw in gimp and save as png, all is ok in linux browsers
> (all of them!) but it does not work in IE
>
> Any ideas how to streamline this so I can save from gimp and it all work ?
IE on windows doesn't render RGBA PNGs properly (unl
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 09:31:05PM +0100, David selby wrote:
> When saving PNGs gimp defaults to compression level 6. Is there any
> reason why I should not use compression level 9 ... Is there a reason
> why this is not the default ?
>
> Dave
I understand that the higher the compression the long
I use pngs rather than GIFs because of the legal problems. All works
well for my linux browsers but I hit problems with IE !!
To get a transparent png which works with IE I have to ...
draw it in the gimp, save as gif ...
execute ... gif2png utility
and hey presto my image works in IE with transpa
13 matches
Mail list logo
