Hi,
it sounds as if you managed to screw things up quite badly. You can't
have several versions of GIMP installed unless you put them into
separate prefixes outside the system search paths. Using '/usr/local'
doesn't count as a separate prefix. Please see the release notes for the
development rele
Rich wrote:
Rich wrote:
Rich wrote:
After installing 2.4.0-rc3, I was configuring the preferences, as I was
trying out the settings,
when I double clicked the 'Main Mouse Wheel' device under
File/Preferences/Input Devices/Input Controllers, Gimp disappears and dies.
One more
Rich wrote:
Rich wrote:
After installing 2.4.0-rc3, I was configuring the preferences, as I was
trying out the settings,
when I double clicked the 'Main Mouse Wheel' device under
File/Preferences/Input Devices/Input Controllers, Gimp disappears and dies.
One more item - I thoug
Rich wrote:
After installing 2.4.0-rc3, I was configuring the preferences, as I was
trying out the settings,
when I double clicked the 'Main Mouse Wheel' device under
File/Preferences/Input Devices/Input Controllers, Gimp disappears and dies.
Hi,
I tried recompiling, same results.
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 11:38 -0300, Rich wrote:
After installing 2.4.0-rc3, I was configuring the preferences, as I was
trying out the settings,
when I double clicked the 'Main Mouse Wheel' device under
File/Preferences/Input Devices/Input Controllers, Gimp disap
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 16:28 -0700, Konstantin Svist wrote:
> > Having tried out Liquid Rescale I'm very impressed. But does anyone have
> > an idea about the size of image it can deal with in terms of memory
> > requirements (I presume the Gimp setting Tile Cache size)?
> >
> > I've crashed
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 22:39 +0100, Marco Presi wrote:
> I noticed that starting from 2.4rc3 Gimp adopted a new printing interface,
> that basically let me choose only the papersize, the resoltion and the
> page layout (if I remeber correclty, the older interface had a
> *incredible* number of
Doug wrote:
> Konstantin Svist wrote:
>> Doug wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Having tried out Liquid Rescale I'm very impressed. But does anyone
>>> have an idea about the size of image it can deal with in terms of
>>> memory requirements (I presume the Gimp setting Tile Cache size)?
>>>
>>> I've crashed i
Konstantin Svist wrote:
> Doug wrote:
>
>>
>> Having tried out Liquid Rescale I'm very impressed. But does anyone have
>> an idea about the size of image it can deal with in terms of memory
>> requirements (I presume the Gimp setting Tile Cache size)?
>>
>> I've crashed it with a 700MB jpg se
