Hi Mike,
On 04 Dec 10 23:17 mikethedj4 said:
> I gotta say this is a different environment, and everything from a
> bunch of other sites, and forums I'm on.
Yeah! Well bear in mind there's a load of old fogey's here. Like, it
was 44 years ago when I was 18. We're not all in the Twitter and
F
ok cool now I know for future reference thanks, and I gotta say this is a
different environment, and everything from a bunch of other sites, and forums
I'm on.
--
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.E
On Saturday 04 December 2010, Greg Chapman wrote:
> Hi David,
-snip---
>
> (Though I might have used the word, blunt, rather than heavy handed
> :-) )
Blunt it shall be then ;-)
see ya
dh
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berke
Hi David,
On 04 Dec 10 20:37 David Herman said:
>
> Actually Greg, your heavy handed reply does not answer the question
> in a helpful manner.
You're right, of course. Especially on a list the topic of which is
graphics, it's worth pointing out how to illustrate your problem.
I feel appropri
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 08:31:01PM +0100, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
> Edit → Preferences → View → Screen resolution → Calibrate… → I measured on
> the screen and got 424 mm horisontally and 185,5 mm vertically. The result
> was a resolution of 95.849×95.849 dpi. Restarted GIMP, created a new imag
On Saturday 04 December 2010, Greg Chapman wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On 04 Dec 10 01:25 mikethedj4 said:
> > I was wondering, for later questions, and such is there any way to
> > embed images, and such on this forum, maybe via HTML???
>
> No!
--snip-
Actually Greg, your he
On 12/04/2010 08:31 PM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
> Edit → Preferences → View → Screen resolution → Calibrate… → I measured on
> the screen and got 424 mm horisontally and 185,5 mm vertically. The result
> was a resolution of 95.849×95.849 dpi. Restarted GIMP, created a new image
> of 100×100 mm, vi
Edit → Preferences → View → Screen resolution → Calibrate… → I measured on
the screen and got 424 mm horisontally and 185,5 mm vertically. The result
was a resolution of 95.849×95.849 dpi. Restarted GIMP, created a new image
of 100×100 mm, viewed it at 100% zoom but it was still 75×75 mm, jus
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 4:53 AM, mikethedj4 wrote:
> well that's understandable, at least I know now so I don't look like a fool
> later on. (I kinda feel like one right now though lol)
>
> Sorry about the last post too, I filled the captcha ahead of time so when I
> finish the post I can just cli
well that's understandable, at least I know now so I don't look like a fool
later on. (I kinda feel like one right now though lol)
Sorry about the last post too, I filled the captcha ahead of time so when I
finish the post I can just click send message, but I wasn't thinking, and
pressed the bu
>Hi Mike,
>On 04 Dec 10 01:25 mikethedj4 said:
>> I was wondering, for later questions, and such is there any way to
>> embed images, and such on this forum, maybe via HTML???
>No!
>This is a mail list, gatewayed, without sanction of the list owner, to
>a forum.
>Posting via the forum (and ha
Hi Mike,
On 04 Dec 10 01:25 mikethedj4 said:
> I was wondering, for later questions, and such is there any way to
> embed images, and such on this forum, maybe via HTML???
No!
This is a mail list, gatewayed, without sanction of the list owner, to
a forum.
Posting via the forum (and having for
12 matches
Mail list logo
