Hi -
I'm trying to combine two images to get better exposure levels, very much
like this tutorial:
http://www.gimp.org/tutorials/Blending_Exposures/
Instead of painting to get the right areas, I want to use a mask to select
the area.
I have used a raw image to create two images for bright and d
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:48:27AM -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 08:08:13PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I also tried Carol's "removing background" tutorial:
> >
> > http://carol.gimp.org/gimp2/basics/backgroundremoval/
> >
> > But it does not describe the "Add
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:48:57PM -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:21:18PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I ended up with two images based on my mask, one with all black in
> > overexposed areas, one with all black in underexposed areas.
> >
> adding a mask should
d further cleanup.
I did just did everything again (on 1/4 size images ... so I need one
another take), and cleaned out specks in the mask.
Here's an image showing the two images I started with (using the Canon raw
image, I created the two images on the left with different exposures), and
cf would have told me almost everything that i needed -- but i did
> not ask for that.
The xcf files (from a previous try) are there, under:
http://www.aracnet.com/~patman/gimp/
> i think that what you would like to do will be more easily accomplished
> if you mask only the upper layer
gt;
> > > the xcf would have told me almost everything that i needed -- but i did
> > > not ask for that.
> >
> > The xcf files (from a previous try) are there, under:
> >
> > http://www.aracnet.com/~patman/gimp/
> >
> http://carol.gimp.org/files/
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 04:53:50AM -0800, Asif Lodhi wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On 12/7/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> X.
> > Message: 4
> X..
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 02:25:07AM -0800, Manish Singh wrote:
> A gimp-devel package *must* have a dependency that either directly or
> indirectly pulls in glib-devel. If it doesn't, the package's dependency
> specification is broken.
> SuSE has a history of being shoddy in this regard, other exa
Hi -
I used to crop, and the canvas size would change to match the crop size.
Now, I always have to select the image -> "fit canvas to layers" after
each
crop to resize the canvas.
I must have changed some global option or something.
Anyone know what global setting or option I need to set?
Tha
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 10:38:49AM -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 08:30:50AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi -
> >
> > I used to crop, and the canvas size would change to match the crop size.
> >
> > Now, I always have to select the image -> "fit canvas to layers" aft
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 11:40:14AM -1000, wayne wrote:
> On Thursday 04 August 2005 07:00 am, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> > It is very likely that you have not installed the development
> > packages on your system (probably called gtk-devel, gimp-devel
> > or something similar). These packages contai
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:36:27PM +0100, qeldroma wrote:
> i've got a bad digital camera and want to work over the results. Bad in this
> case means, that i've got good resolution and good results concerning the
> light, but a bad sharpness.
>
> My idea is, that if i've got a good resolution,
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 02:19:56PM +0100, qeldroma wrote:
> Ok, so i will try to answer every question:
>
> Am Mittwoch, 2. November 2005 01:56 schrieben Sie:
> > i am sure your willingness to answer will be just as keen as your
> > willingness to ask for help here.
> Of course ;)
>
> I have aske
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 01:10:19AM +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On 11/17/05, Timo Steuerwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hey, that's a cool feature! Thanks a lot! I didn't know that up to now,
> > but anyway: How does this automatical white balance work?
>
> I don't know how exactly
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 10:29:39AM +0100, John Bougainville wrote:
> >No, this is not _the_ way for this simple task. The approaches with
> >the ImageMagick tools are much more simple and easier to handle.
> >And: ImageMagick is part of many Linux distributions.
> >
> >So, really no need to dig in
15 matches
Mail list logo
