Well now that really makes sense -- that might be a good wiki addition. So I
believe that this tool is working both as designed and as expected --
antialias does do its job when you fill a selection though. :) And basically
it can't do it's job as a rule when you stroke a selection.
On Tue, Oct 28
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 17:54 +1030, David Gowers wrote:
> I can confirm this bug. If you stroke using a tool (eg paintbrush),
> the result is antialiased, so I don't understand why the vector
> stroking isn't
Simon has actually explained this quite well already. The outline you
are strok
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Ernie Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Budig wrote:
>
>> Nathan Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>
>>>So why not convert your selection to a path then stroke the path? This is a
>>>good work around, and even in my mind now, this makes sense. The stroked
>>>
Simon Budig wrote:
> Nathan Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>>So why not convert your selection to a path then stroke the path? This is a
>>good work around, and even in my mind now, this makes sense. The stroked
>>path is antialiased.
>
> This is a good workaround if you know what you're doin
Sven Neumann wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 18:14 -0400, Ernie Wright wrote:
>
>>"Does something the user does not expect" is the definition of a design
>>flaw
>
> It's more like "technically it does the right thing, but the user
> expects a different result".
Design flaws aren't technical pro
Nathan Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> So why not convert your selection to a path then stroke the path? This is a
> good work around, and even in my mind now, this makes sense. The stroked
> path is antialiased.
This is a good workaround if you know what you're doing and what effect
you're afte
So why not convert your selection to a path then stroke the path? This is a
good work around, and even in my mind now, this makes sense. The stroked
path is antialiased.
Nathan
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 18:14 -0400, Er
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 18:14 -0400, Ernie Wright wrote:
> "Does something the user does not expect" is the definition of a design
> flaw
It's more like "technically it does the right thing, but the user
expects a different result". Unfortunately there is often no clear
solution for these kin
Simon Budig wrote:
> Ernie Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>> I don't get *any* antialiasing when I stroke elliptical selections.
>
> You're not doing anything wrong and we know about this effect. Gimp
> doesn't do anything wrong either, it just does something the user does
> not expect it t
Ernie Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I don't get *any* antialiasing when I stroke elliptical selections.
>
> Antialiasing is checked in the tool attributes of the Ellipse Select
> tool. It's also checked in the Choose Stroke Style dialog.
>
> Fills antialias just fine. I also get an antial
I don't get *any* antialiasing when I stroke elliptical selections.
Antialiasing is checked in the tool attributes of the Ellipse Select
tool. It's also checked in the Choose Stroke Style dialog.
Fills antialias just fine. I also get an antialiased line if I convert
the selection to a path and
11 matches
Mail list logo
