From: "anatoly techtonik"
From: Philip Oakley
> So if I understand correctly, the hope is that `git show-ref --tags`
> could
> get an alternate option `--all-tags` [proper option name required...]
> such
> that the user would not have to develop the rather over the
:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:52 AM, anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Randall S. Becker
>>> <rsbec...@nexbridge.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2017-11-23 02:31 (GMT-05
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Igor Djordjevic writes:
>
>> If you would like to mimic output of "git show-ref", repeating
>> commits for each tag pointing to it and showing full tag name as
>> well, you could do something
anatoly techtonik writes:
>> Git is not doomed to preserve anything forever. We've gradually broken
>> backwards compatibility for a few core things like these.
>>
>> However, just as a bystander reading this thread I haven't seen any
>> compelling reason for why these
PM, Randall S. Becker
<rsbec...@nexbridge.com> wrote:
On 2017-11-23 02:31 (GMT-05:00) anatoly techtonik wrote
Subject: Re: Unify annotated and non-annotated tags
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com>
wrote:
Igor Djordjevic <igor.d.djordje...@gmai
:
>>> On 2017-11-23 02:31 (GMT-05:00) anatoly techtonik wrote
>>>>Subject: Re: Unify annotated and non-annotated tags
>>>>On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>>>> Igor Djordjevic <igor.d.djordje...@g
On November 24, 2017 4:52 AM anatoly techtonik wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Randall S. Becker <rsbec...@nexbridge.com>
>wrote:
>> On 2017-11-23 02:31 (GMT-05:00) anatoly techtonik wrote
>>>Subject: Re: Unify annotated and non-annotated tags On Sat, Nov 11,
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:52 AM, anatoly techtonik <techto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Randall S. Becker
> <rsbec...@nexbridge.com> wrote:
>> On 2017-11-23 02:31 (GMT-05:00) anatoly techtonik wrote
>>>Subject: Re: Unify annotated and
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Randall S. Becker
<rsbec...@nexbridge.com> wrote:
> On 2017-11-23 02:31 (GMT-05:00) anatoly techtonik wrote
>>Subject: Re: Unify annotated and non-annotated tags
>>On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com>
Am 23.11.2017 um 16:08 schrieb Randall S. Becker:
[...]
>> So my proposal is to get rid of non-annotated tags, so to get all
>> tags with commits that they point to, one would use:
>> git for-each-ref --format='%(*objectname) %(refname)' refs/tags>
>> For so-called non-annotated tags just leave
On 2017-11-23 02:31 (GMT-05:00) anatoly techtonik wrote
>Subject: Re: Unify annotated and non-annotated tags
>On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Igor Djordjevic <igor.d.djordje...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> If you
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Igor Djordjevic writes:
>
>> If you would like to mimic output of "git show-ref", repeating
>> commits for each tag pointing to it and showing full tag name as
>> well, you could do something
On 11/11/2017 03:06, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Igor Djordjevic writes:
>
>> If you would like to mimic output of "git show-ref", repeating
>> commits for each tag pointing to it and showing full tag name as
>> well, you could do something like this, for example:
>>
Igor Djordjevic writes:
> If you would like to mimic output of "git show-ref", repeating
> commits for each tag pointing to it and showing full tag name as
> well, you could do something like this, for example:
>
> for tag in $(git for-each-ref
Hi Anatoly,
On 10/11/2017 11:58, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> It is hard to work with Git tags, because on low level hash
> of non-annotated tag is pointing to commit, but hash for
> annotated tag is pointing to tag metadata.
>
> On low level that means that there is no way to get commit
> hash
15 matches
Mail list logo