Re: [gitorious] Merge request

https://gitorious.org/gitorious/mainline/merge_requests/153 Please merge to both rails-3.1 and master branches. Thanks, I've merged, and will pushed them in a minute. We shall also discuss about migrating from ultrasphinx to thinking-sphinx plugin... Actually, we're contemplating

Re: [gitorious] Merge request

I've pushed to the rails-3.1 branch. I also deployed the changes to our staging area. All the tests run fine, and it looks dandy, but we always run any significant changes for a few days in the staging area just to be sure. Will update master later this week. Christian On Mon, May 16, 2011 at

Re: [gitorious] Error when trying to get to Administration from the web interface

Em 16-05-2011 03:05, Christian Johansen escreveu: It is not explained the reason why the rules are different for new and existent users, but I guess the original format was USERNAME_FORMAT, which allowed underscore (_) and dots (.). Then, for some unknown reason to me, it has

Re: [gitorious] Error when trying to get to Administration from the web interface

I think limiting user names so that it doesn't include dots or underscore is not the best thing, specially if you take in account the ldap branch that will be merged eventually. You don't want to make a company adopting gitorious to change its username policy. I know that adding the proper

Re: [gitorious] Error when trying to get to Administration from the web interface

Pedro, I agree with you and I think the router problem will not be an issue anymore on Rails 3 router. I just find it confusing to have 2 rules for usernames. If currently Gitorious doesn't support usernames with dots and underscore, I don't think it makes sense to allow it at all. But we

[gitorious] Run Gitorious(separate components) on separate machines?

Hi All, i've just started using GIT(ex-SVN user) and just installed and got working Gitorious (fantastic BTW!) however the tutorials i've followed have me install everything on a single machine -- thats fine to testing , but in the real world for production or external exposure, that not so hot.

Re: [gitorious] Run Gitorious(separate components) on separate machines?

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Jed jedbl...@gmail.com wrote: so, is it possible to install git/gitorious on separate linux instances? Well, yes ... kind of. I would lke to have the DB on a dedicated DB machine ( this seem easy enough) That's one of the easy parts. Just point the

[gitorious] Rails 3.1 branch rebasing

Hi, I've seen Marius did what he suggested: created the thin layer around ultrasphinx. Now, comes the question. Should I rebase the rails-3.1 branch against master? Or do you (Marius, Christian) prefer to do it yourself? I'm asking that because I think there is no easy way that you can check

[gitorious] Re: Run Gitorious(separate components) on separate machines?

Marius, thanks for the reply, much appreciated! I suppose for the time being i'll just expose Git/orious as a single machine/instance and use a load balancer to direct external Git/orious request to that single machine , while not affecting my currect WWW load-balanced Tier. Looking forward

Re: [gitorious] Rails 3.1 branch rebasing

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 18:14, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas rr.ro...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I've seen Marius did what he suggested: created the thin layer around ultrasphinx. Now, comes the question. Should I rebase the rails-3.1 branch against master? Or do you (Marius, Christian) prefer to do it