Re: GHC include files

2000-03-01 Thread Michael Weber
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 17:06:01 +, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote: > BTW, I see lack of standard way of conveniently installing a Haskell > library. For example c2hs installs in its own subdirectory and provides a > script c2hs-config which outputs compiler and linker flags necessary to > li

RE: GHC include files

2000-03-01 Thread Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > > Don't know about binary dists, but I compiled 4.06 from source and > > it did install directly in /usr/local/lib, which is IMHO not so good. > > Many files used by a single package should generally go to a separate > > subdirectory. I reran ./configure

Re: GHC include files

2000-03-01 Thread Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
Malcolm Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > Can I propose a change to the -i / -I flags? Currently, the -idir (or > -Idir) options add a directory to the search path for imports. This > directory is either relative to the current dir, or absolute. My > suggestion is that it could also be used

RE: GHC include files

2000-03-01 Thread Simon Marlow
> Just a few remarks and personal opinions from a RPM builder's view: > >* IMHO the whole /usr/local hierarchy is completely obsolete for > and "real" programs should only be used for quick local hacks. > => GHC should reside under /usr/{bin,lib,include} I'd rather say that the use

Re: GHC include files

2000-03-01 Thread George Russell
I must admit I'm surprised by the reaction to my suggestion. Here /usr is shared between lots of machines and there is no question of my installing GHC in /usr/bin or anything like it. (The few system adminstrators here are all honest, overworked, and sadly incorruptible.) My original problem w

Re: GHC include files

2000-03-01 Thread Sven Panne
Simon Marlow wrote: > I think on reflection that /usr/local/lib/ghc or > /usr/local/lib/ghc-4.06 would be a better choice than > /usr/local/lib. Just a few remarks and personal opinions from a RPM builder's view: * IMHO the whole /usr/local hierarchy is completely obsolete for and "real"

RE: GHC include files

2000-03-01 Thread Simon Marlow
> Don't know about binary dists, but I compiled 4.06 from source and > it did install directly in /usr/local/lib, which is IMHO not so good. > Many files used by a single package should generally go to a separate > subdirectory. I reran ./configure with some option to install in > /usr/local/lib/

RE: HaXml stuff ...

2000-03-01 Thread Simon Marlow
> GHC maintainers: this is definitely a FAQ - is it mentioned on the GHC > download page? Yes :) http://www.haskell.org/ghc/faq_406.html Simon

Re: HaXml stuff ...

2000-03-01 Thread Keith Wansbrough
On the Haskell list, Bill Halchin writes: > I am trying to build the HaXML stuff and the linker (ld) is > looking for an archive, gmp.a, which I don't have installed. Can > anybody lead me in the right direction?? [queries like this should really go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Re: GHC include files

2000-03-01 Thread Malcolm Wallace
> > Maybe there should be a standard place to put Haskell interfaces and > > libraries/objects. As there can be many modules in a package and thus > > many interfaces, and collisions between module names are harmless in > > a case where both are not used in the same program, interfaces should > >