Good afternoon,
Not dircetly Linux, sorry, but British Gas has spent the last year sending me
letters saying they can't email me. When I look into it, their emails are
rejected based on a bad DKIM signature.
The problem is, not receiving the email, how can I find out what the problem
is? mx
Hi,
So first of all, as far as I can see, British Gas's DMARC policy is set
to "reject".
BUT, the email is actually coming from MailJet, from the limited info
below. I think what you need to check if you can, is what the name of
the DKIM signature they are using actually is, and maybe that w
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 04:20:34PM +, Marco van Beek via GLLUG wrote:
Hi,
I suggest grepping your logs for "2F7612233E" as that should pull up
all the the info related to that email from the point Postfix accepts
the connection until it closes, and see if that tells you some more.
Regard
Hello,
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 03:48:17PM +, Henrik Morsing via GLLUG wrote:
> The problem is, not receiving the email, how can I find out what
> the problem is? mxtoolbox says their setup is fine, but that
> surely can't check the signature inside one of their emails.
The last two emails I g
Hi,
So looking at this, and Andy's email with what he sees, it looks like
his British Gas emails are coming from a different place to yours. His
are coming from SalesForce, and yours are coming from Mail Jet, so I
don't think we can draw much from that.
I think the next thing to look at is m
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 06:06:56PM +, Marco van Beek via GLLUG wrote:
> So looking at this, and Andy's email with what he sees, it looks like his
> British Gas emails are coming from a different place to yours. His are
> coming from SalesForce, and yours are coming from Mail Jet, so I don'
Hi,
On 15 Jan 2024 at 18:07:08, Andy Smith via GLLUG wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 06:06:56PM +, Marco van Beek via GLLUG wrote:
> > So looking at this, and Andy's email with what he sees, it looks like his
> > British Gas emails are coming from a different place to yours. His are
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 06:06:56PM +, Marco van Beek via GLLUG wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
So looking at this, and Andy's email with what he sees, it looks like
his British Gas emails are coming from a different place to yours. His
are coming from SalesForce, and yours are coming from Mail Jet, so I
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 07:45:25PM +, Carles Pina i Estany via GLLUG wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Side note, almost unrelated.
In a personal/family server I have a nightly script that sends me which
emails have been rejected by the server. Why? Postfix, in my
configuration, rejects some emails. For
Hi,
On 17 Jan 2024 at 12:30:15, Henrik Morsing via GLLUG wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 07:45:25PM +, Carles Pina i Estany via GLLUG
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> >
> > Side note, almost unrelated.
> >
> > In a personal/family server I have a nightly script that sends me which
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 11:26:22PM +, Carles Pina i Estany via GLLUG wrote:
Nothing top secret. It's not a public script because I have it in a repo
with internal tools for the personal server.
[...]
Cheers,
--
Carles Pina i Estany
https://carles.pina.cat
Thanks!
Regards,
Henrik Mor
I'm now getting the same from the Land Registry:
Jan 27 18:05:24 emil postfix/smtpd[734113]: DA88621F91:
client=d218-4.smtp-out.eu-west-2.amazonses.com[23.249.218.4]
Jan 27 18:05:24 emil postfix/cleanup[734121]: DA88621F91:
message-id=<010b018d4c1902e5-14919a91-2793-4c5e-8d86-4091eaeb1175-000
Hi,
On 27 Jan 2024 at 18:08:36, Henrik Morsing via GLLUG wrote:
>
> I'm now getting the same from the Land Registry:
>
> Jan 27 18:05:24 emil postfix/smtpd[734113]: DA88621F91:
> client=d218-4.smtp-out.eu-west-2.amazonses.com[23.249.218.4]
> Jan 27 18:05:24 emil postfix/cleanup[734121]: DA8862
On 27/01/2024 18:08, Henrik Morsing via GLLUG wrote:
I'm now getting the same from the Land Registry:
I wish there was a test I could do to check what is actually wrong...
Okay, so this would indicate that it is more likely something wrong at
your end rather than at theirs. I think that this
Hi,
On 28 Jan 2024 at 14:37:43, Marco van Beek via GLLUG wrote:
> On 27/01/2024 18:08, Henrik Morsing via GLLUG wrote:
> >
> > I'm now getting the same from the Land Registry:
> >
> > I wish there was a test I could do to check what is actually wrong...
> >
> Okay, so this would indicate that
Hi all,
Happy Easter. I have some days off, so finally had some time to look at this.
Having disabled rejection in January gave me some more data to look at and it
became obvious that anyone using 1024-bit keys failed the check and anyone
using 2048-bit passed.
I found one person out there
Hi again,
I just installed the DKIM Verifier extension to Thunderbird on my laptop and
that fails the email as well. My laptop has OpenSSL 3.1.4, so that has the bug
as well.
Still no closer to fixing this though.
Regards,
Henrik Morsing
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 03:30:47PM +0100, Henrik M
Just noticed that the last I heard from this group was in March. Has it
been unusually quiet, or am I missing out?
On 31/03/2024 18:12, Henrik Morsing via GLLUG wrote:
Hi again,
I just installed the DKIM Verifier extension to Thunderbird on my
laptop and that fails the email as well. My lapt
"It's quiet. It's too damn quiet..."
On 09/07/2024 01:13, Steve Parker via GLLUG wrote:
Just noticed that the last I heard from this group was in March. Has
it been unusually quiet, or am I missing out?
On 31/03/2024 18:12, Henrik Morsing via GLLUG wrote:
Hi again,
I just installed the DKIM
19 matches
Mail list logo
