Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster testing matrix

On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Benjamin Turner wrote: > WRT performance. I would be happy to kick of daily performance regression > runs on what ever you guys would like. My current daily runs don't take > any more than 6-8 hours, I could fit another 4 hours in there for > upstream. I could

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster testing matrix

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: > Where / How do you indicate whether the underlying GlusterFS is > used/tested using fusemount or libgfapi method or both ? > There is no mechanism as of today to run the same test on GFAPI of FUSE mount. Hence the tests explicitly choose t

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster testing matrix

WRT performance. I would be happy to kick of daily performance regression runs on what ever you guys would like. My current daily runs don't take any more than 6-8 hours, I could fit another 4 hours in there for upstream. I could also run them on RDMA to help out on some coverage there. LMK wha

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster testing matrix

Where / How do you indicate whether the underlying GlusterFS is used/tested using fusemount or libgfapi method or both ? On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > Hi All, > > Here is a table representing the current state of Gluster testing. > > * Things in green are categories

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster testing matrix

More subcategories to add as suggested: 1. RDMA transport ptotocol 2. Openstatck-Manila integration 3. IPv6 support New test categories which was missed in the last mail 1. Static Code analysis (Coverity/SonarQube) 2. Doc checks (Most likely be manual - All new feature or updates should have cor

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster testing matrix

- Original Message - > From: "Raghavendra Talur" > To: "Gluster Devel" > Cc: "Vishwanath Bhat" > Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 5:39:17 PM > Subject: [Gluster-devel] Gluster testing matrix > > Hi All, > > Here is a table representing the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster testing matrix

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > We'd also need IPv6 support in our infra going forward. Worth a discussion on the -infra@ list to check and verify readiness. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay _

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster testing matrix

We'd also need IPv6 support in our infra going forward. -Atin Sent from one plus one On Nov 25, 2015 7:05 PM, "Mohammed Rafi K C" wrote: > > Did you forget RDMA :)? > > Rafi KC > > > On 11/25/2015 05:39 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> Here is a table representing the current stat

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster testing matrix

Did you forget RDMA :)? Rafi KC On 11/25/2015 05:39 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > Hi All, > > Here is a table representing the current state of Gluster testing. > > * Things in green are categories for which we have some kind of > testing in place. > * Things in red are the ones which don't have

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster testing matrix

- Original Message - > From: "Raghavendra Talur" > To: "Gluster Devel" > Cc: "Vishwanath Bhat" > Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 5:39:17 PM > Subject: [Gluster-devel] Gluster testing matrix > > Hi All, > > Here is

[Gluster-devel] Gluster testing matrix

Hi All, Here is a table representing the current state of Gluster testing. * Things in green are categories for which we have some kind of testing in place. * Things in red are the ones which don't have any tests. * Things in yellow are the ones which have no known tests or are not managed by Gl