On Friday 09 September 2011 10:30 AM, Thomas Jackson wrote:
Hi everyone,
Hello Thomas,
Try the following:
1. In the fuse volume file, try:
Under write-behind:
option cache-size 16MB
Under read-ahead:
option page-count 16
Under io-cache:
option cache-size=64MB
2. Did you get 9Gbits/Sec
On Tuesday 30 August 2011 08:36 PM, Christian wrote:
Hello to all,
I'm currently testing glusterfs ( version 3.1.4, 3.1.6, 3.2.2, 3.2.3 and
3.3beta ) for the following situation / behavior:
I want to create a replicated storage via internet / wan with two
storage nodes.
The first node is
On Wednesday 17 August 2011 09:18 AM, Daniel wrote:
Hello Pavan,
I came cross one question about DHT lookup.
When dht_lookup process a fresh lookup, if the looked up target can not
be found by hashed, why does it assert it as a directory and lookup on
all the child nodes?
Not sure why you
On Friday 12 August 2011 08:48 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
John Mark Walkerjwal...@gluster.com wrote:
I've CC'd the gluster-devel list in the hopes that someone there can help
you out. However, my understanding is that it will take some significant
porting to get GlusterFS to run in any
On Wednesday 10 August 2011 12:11 AM, Jesse Stroik wrote:
Pavan,
Thank you for your help. We wanted to get back to you with our results
and observations. I'm cc'ing gluster-users for posterity.
We did experiment with enable-trickling-writes. That was one of the
translator tunables we wanted to
On Wednesday 10 August 2011 02:56 AM, Joey McDonald wrote:
Hello all,
I've configured 4 bricks over a GigE network, however I'm getting very
slow performance for writing to my gluster share.
Just set this up this week, and here's what I'm seeing:
A few questions -
1. Are these baremetal
On Monday 08 August 2011 01:30 PM, Uwe Kastens wrote:
Hi again,
If one thinks about a large amount of data, maybe as a replacement for tapes.
Will auto heal of gluster help with data corruption problems? I would expect
that, but only, if the files are accessed on a regular basis.
As far as I
[..]
I don't know why my writes are so slow compared to reads. Let me know
if you're able to get better write speeds with the newer version of
gluster and any of the configurations (if they apply) that I've
posted. It might compel me to upgrade.
From your documentation of nfsspeedtest, I
On Wednesday 27 July 2011 01:45 PM, 공용준(yongjoon kong)/Cloud
Computing 기술담당/SKCC wrote:
Hello,
I'm gluster with distributed-replicated mode(4 brick server)
And 10client server mount gluster volume brick1 server. ( mount -t glustefs
brick1:/volume /mnt)
And there's very strange thing.
The
But that still does not explain why you should get as low as 50 MB/s for
a single stream single client write when the backend can support direct
IO throughput of more than 700 MB/s.
On the server, can you collect:
# iostat -xcdh 2 iostat.log.brickXX
for the duration of the dd command ?
and
On Tuesday 26 July 2011 03:42 AM, John Lalande wrote:
Hi-
I'm new to Gluster, but am trying to get it set up on a new compute
cluster we're building. We picked Gluster for one of our cluster file
systems (we're also using Lustre for fast scratch space), but the
Gluster performance has been so
On Tuesday 26 July 2011 09:24 PM, John Lalande wrote:
Thanks for your help, Pavan!
Hi John,
I would need some more information about your setup to estimate the
performance you should get with your gluster setup.
1. Can you provide the details of how disks are connected to the
storage boxes ?
On Saturday 25 June 2011 03:56 PM, anish.b.ku...@ril.com wrote:
Yes sure it's 74 MB .
I am using Gluster version 3.2.1.1
In my 4 node cluster setup, one of my node on which I am performing test run is
physical sever of HP proliant DL 380 G5 having RHEL 5.5 OS ,is having 1000Mbps
network.
On Friday 24 June 2011 10:29 AM, anish.b.ku...@ril.com wrote:
Hi….
I have setup a 4 node cluster on virtual servers on RHEL platform.
It would help if you can post the output of gluster volume info, to
start with. Are you using some benchmark to compare GlusterFS
performance with local
On Sunday 12 June 2011 07:00 PM, François Thiebolt wrote:
Hello,
To make things clear, what I've done is :
- deploying GlusterFS on 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 nodes
- running a variant of the MAB benchmark (it's all about compilation of
openssl-1.0.0) on 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 nodes
- I used
On Wednesday 08 June 2011 06:10 PM, Francois THIEBOLT wrote:
Hello,
I'm driving some experiments on grid'5000 with GlusterFS 3.2 and, as a
first point, i've been unable to start a volume featuring 128bricks (64 ok)
Then, due to the round-robin scheduler, as the number of nodes increase
(every
16 matches
Mail list logo
