Dear all GROMACS users,
I'm new in protein simulation.
Does anybody let me know in what subroutine the harmonic restraint is
implemented? If I would like to trace back to the subroutine from md.c, how can
I do that?
I really appreciate any comments on such a beginner's question.
Best,
Jae H. Pa
Hi there,
below you can find a "dirty" perl script that I used to extract
structure from a trr by reading the cluster.log file from g_cluster
Just remove in the cluster.log file all the lines until the (included):
cl. | #st rmsd | middle rmsd | cluster members
# paste from here --
David is right! There are no FF that has been parametrized for vaccum
simulations and the best you can do is using a classical FF and neutralize
charges to avoid collapses ...
be aware of what you do ...
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:13:33 +0200
David van der Spoel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thomas
Guys,
Does anybody have an already prepared topology of cyclohexane?
Thanks.
--
Vitaly
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search be
Morteza Khabiri wrote:
Dear gmxuser,
Thanks for your all helps. But still I have problem. As you friend said I
increase the vdw and box size and also i decrease the time step till
0.0001 but unfortunately system crash befor EM running. I do check with
ngmx.
To reply the question that said what
Dear people,
I have parameterized a ligand with one phosphate and one pyrophospate group
using antechamber with AM1-BCC charges and the GAFF forcefield. Amber files
were converted to gmx files (*.itp/*.top and *.gro) with the amb2gmx
conversion tool (http://www.alchemistry.org/wiki/index.php/Free_
Thomas Schlesier wrote:
>>/ Thank you.
> />/ But i have one last question:
> />/For epsilon_rf i use the relative permittivity of the medium. I simulate
>in
> />/vacuum so epsilon_rf would be 1?
> /GROMOS ff is not parameterized for vaccum simulations of the b-something
> version ... have
Actually in vaccum the RF is meaningless ... use cutoff.
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:49:38 +0200
Thomas Schlesier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>/ Thank you. > />/ But i have one last question: >
/>/For epsilon_rf i use the relative permittivity of the medium. I simulate
in > /
vivek sharma wrote:
Hi There,
I have a 5 nsec trajectory file for my system...and a RMSD plot for the
same.
while doing simulation I have sampled the frame at each 500 ps,
Now I want to choose conformation on the basis of RMSD values, like
conformation which has RMSD difference of some value
>>/ Thank you.
> />/ But i have one last question:
> />/For epsilon_rf i use the relative permittivity of the medium. I simulate
>in
> />/vacuum so epsilon_rf would be 1?
> /GROMOS ff is not parameterized for vaccum simulations of the b-something
> version ... have look at the
Xavier Periole wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:14:08 +0200
Thomas Schlesier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
/ Thank you.
/>/ But i have one last question:
/>/For epsilon_rf i use the relative permittivity of the medium. I
simulate in />/vacuum so epsilon_rf would be 1?
/GROMOS ff is not parameter
Hi,
I am trying to calculate the N-H dipole autocorrelation function of my
protein using g_dipoles. The mentioned the atom numbers of these two in my
index file. I have given the following command:
g_dipoles -f md_minim_traj.trr -s MD_1BA4.tpr -P 2 -corr mol -c
dipo_corr.xvg -b -e 1000 -n
Good file. I see no problems in it. However I asked not only for the
gro file but also force field parameters.
If you really need help the best variant to provide all the system you
try to simulate.
>
> I could not send my file by gmx user because of this I attached it to email.
>
> Thanks for yo
(1) 6 eigenvalues represent rotation and translation. For (very) small
molecules, these can be quite substantial, see Carlsson and Aqvist, /J.
Phys. Chem. B,/ *109* (13), 6448 -6456, 2005. By fitting you remove the
rotation and translation. You can search the literature for papers that
discuss the
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:14:08 +0200
Thomas Schlesier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
/ Thank you.
/>/ But i have one last question:
/>/For epsilon_rf i use the relative permittivity of the medium. I simulate
in
/>/vacuum so epsilon_rf would be 1?
/GROMOS ff is not parameterized for vaccum simulati
>/ Thank you.
/>/ But i have one last question:
/>/For epsilon_rf i use the relative permittivity of the medium. I simulate in
/>/vacuum so epsilon_rf would be 1?
/GROMOS ff is not parameterized for vaccum simulations of the b-something
version ... have look at the paper.
So i should use ffG43b1
Hi There,
I have a 5 nsec trajectory file for my system...and a RMSD plot for the
same.
while doing simulation I have sampled the frame at each 500 ps,
Now I want to choose conformation on the basis of RMSD values, like
conformation which has RMSD difference of some value say A nanometer.
Can anybo
Dear Li Yang,
I forward your email to the GMX mailing list, which may be better for
you since other users can contribute as well. I'll reply there - I hope
you've subscribed to the list.
Ran.
Li Yang wrote:
> Dear Ran Friedman
>
> I'm sorry to disturb you, my name is Li Yang, I'm a chinese student
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:00:17 +0200
Thomas Schlesier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thank you.
But i have one last question:
For epsilon_rf i use the relative permittivity of the medium. I simulate in
vacuum so epsilon_rf would be 1?
GROMOS ff is not parameterized for vaccum simulations of the b-so
Thank you.
But i have one last question:
For epsilon_rf i use the relative permittivity of the medium. I simulate in
vacuum so epsilon_rf would be 1?
Thomas
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:27:57 +0200
Thomas Schlesier http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users>> wrote:
>/ Ok, then i would take
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:27:57 +0200
Thomas Schlesier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, then i would take to following parameters:
_x is vdw or coulomb
rlist 1.7 (must be greater then r_x)
r_x1.4
r_x_switch0.8
x_typeshift
right?!?
No,
rlist 0.8
nstlist 5
rcoulomb 1.4
rvdw 1.4
vdwty
Ok, then i would take to following parameters:
_x is vdw or coulomb
rlist 1.7 (must be greater then r_x)
r_x1.4
r_x_switch0.8
x_typeshift
right?!?
Thomas
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman
Thanks Justin for your reply,
You mean to say that first keep PR on protein allowing the lipids to
move(packing), later switch over to production run without keep PR on lipids?
Here iam getting doubt that, While embedding protein into popc some of the
lipids will be deleted led to creation of
Hi users,
I would like to restart some REMD simulations done with the cvs code with
the new checkpoint feature, but I'm unsure if I'm doing it right. Each
replica has its own state#.cpt file, but it seems to me that the -cpi
option of the cvs mdrun (at version 3.3.99_development_20080718) only
a
VENKATESH HARIHARAN wrote:
Hello,
Simple question. I am running constraint pulling and getting the .xtc
and .tpr output files in order to create a pdb video using trjconv. I
am running simulations on a cluster, and so a pbs script must be
submitted with the necessary commands. When using
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:56:41 +0200
Thomas Schlesier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear all,
i have changed the topologie but i have a question regarding the
following simulations.
With ffgmx the length of the cut-offs (/rcoulomb /and /rvdw/) is
standard 1.0 (default adjustment by GROMACS). I believ
Hello everyone,
Does anyone have a script to do T-WHAM analysis of replica exchange
trajectories?
Any help would be great!
Thanks,
Andrea
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please
Dear all,
i have changed the topologie but i have a question regarding the
following simulations.
With ffgmx the length of the cut-offs (/rcoulomb /and /rvdw/) is
standard 1.0 (default adjustment by GROMACS). I believe that i've seen
some time ago that for the GROMOS96 force fields the cut-offs sho
28 matches
Mail list logo