On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> I need to keep xdm running, and runnable, but I also want
> X to stop listening on port 1029. Twiddling a firewall won't
> do; this needs to be done at the origin.
Why won't a firewall do? I find general firewalls are sometimes easier, and
a
Today, Derek Martin gleaned this insight:
> Thank you MediaHun...
For those I may have inadvertently confused (and for those who actually
care), the receipt of the previous message is your indication that the
problem is now fixed. ;)
Thanks!
[P.S. In case you were wondering what relevance thi
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> I did a 'modprobe -c' and noticed two interesting lines:
>
> alias scsi_hostadapter aic7xxx
> alias scsi_hostadapter off
>
> The first was added to conf.modules; the second is coming from
> I don't know where.
$ strings $( which mo
On Wed, 31 May 2000, Adam Wendt wrote:
> Anyone on here familiar with ansi color codes?
It has been awhile, but yes...
> I'm trying to figure how to bold the background color...
AFAIK, you cannot. "Bright Background" colors, in my experience, were
always accomplished by flipping a bit on t
Yep, changed my IP address for the 6th time since August, and forgot to
provide reverse DNS for my IP address. Not only did they not assign my
specified host name, but they didn't give me one AT ALL!
Thank you MediaHun...
--
PGP/GPG Public key at http://cerberus.ne.mediaone.net/~derek/pubkey.
http://www.pythonware.com/people/fredrik/hotair.htm
A short story
-
A man piloting a hot air balloon discovers he has wandered off
course and is hopelessly lost. He descends to a lower altitude
and locates a man down on the ground. He lowers the balloon
further and shouts, "Excuse m
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 02:41:20PM -0400, MarkG wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 02:08:33PM -0400, Warren Mansur wrote:
> > One probable reason is that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is an address to a Compaq
> > server. So, whenever anyone sends email to this address, regardless of the
> > cc's, it goes thro
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 02:08:33PM -0400, Warren Mansur wrote:
> One probable reason is that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is an address to a Compaq
> server. So, whenever anyone sends email to this address, regardless of the
> cc's, it goes through compaq. Apparently the gnhlug server tries to send the
> e
One probable reason is that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is an address to a Compaq
server. So, whenever anyone sends email to this address, regardless of the
cc's, it goes through compaq. Apparently the gnhlug server tries to send the
email to each of the email addresses in the list, and that particular se
At 01:35 PM 6/5/2000 -0400, Brian Chabot wrote:
nop i get it too. its annoying
~kurth
>Anyone know why every time I reply to this list I get bounced from
>compaq.com???
>
>AFAIK my SMTP server should be handling the CC's, and not trying to
>relay through Compaq/DEC.
>
>Thoughts? Is this a
Anyone know why every time I reply to this list I get bounced from
compaq.com???
AFAIK my SMTP server should be handling the CC's, and not trying to
relay through Compaq/DEC.
Thoughts? Is this a misconfig on my end or at Compaq/DEC?
Brian (Bounce message follows)
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Mail
Well, if you contact Bob Sparks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), he's the one
with the contacts for donations to the state of NH. I know they do
PCs, don't know about other systems.
the suggestion for the gnhlug demo machine isn't bad. If we need a
home for one, I may be able to find one ;).
jeff
On Su
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Thomas Charron wrote:
> > Well, I now have an old Sun Sparc10 that I would like to get rid of but I
> > can't find that earlier post.
> This may be a decent demo box for use by GNHLUG itself, no?
If not, I'd be more than happy to find a use for it... if only as
another lea
Quoting Jamey Poirier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello everyone,
> I saw some mail on this list a couple of months back asking for people to
> donate old computers.
> Well, I now have an old Sun Sparc10 that I would like to get rid of but I
> can't find that earlier post.
> I would rather donate the s
Hello everyone,
I saw some mail on this list a couple of months back asking for people to
donate old computers.
Well, I now have an old Sun Sparc10 that I would like to get rid of but I
can't find that earlier post.
I would rather donate the system to a useful cause if possible, if not I'll
jus
June 12th 7:00 PM @ NHCTC Brian Stevens from Mission Critical Linux will be Presenting
on Clustering.
Lori Hitchcock
Hitchcock Staffing 800-867-9188
**
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text
Sorry for the late post, but couldn't be helped.
I posted last week that the SLUG meeting was the 5th of June. It was
changed back to the regular SLUG meeting day of the second Monday of the
month. So here is the details one more time.
June 12th - SLUG meeting Brian Stevens of Mission Critical L
That's exactly why Micro$oft wants to keep the details of their "proprietary"
extension to Kerberos private, they'd rather break interoperability and keep
their customers locked in than chance the risk that customers would move
if it were easily possible. Slashdot's providing a forum that threate
Standards are another thing. The market leader always wants to eschew
standards. IBM used to do this in the mainframe business. Back in the
'60s, the standard was ASCII, and IBM used EBCDIC, the standard for
databases was network, IBM went hierachial. There were other things
also. We see Micro
Ken,
On Mon, 05 Jun 2000, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to keep xdm running, and runnable, but I also want
> X to stop listening on port 1029. Twiddling a firewall won't
> do; this needs to be done at the origin. Using startx won't
> do. lsof shows me X, xconsole,
It's the typical Microsoft thing. Take a standard, make it slightly
incompatible, and then try to make their incompatible version the new
standard. They tried that with Java already (and failed thank
goodness).
Warren
Jerry Feldman wrote:
> I am baffled why Microsoft would do this. Interestin
I don't know where the source of this lies, but I suspect it's
a GNOME setting. I notice this most in my rxvt windows; I'm
not sure if I've seen it with any other applications. Actually,
I see that it isn't the case with Netscrape..
When I drag to scroll down, in ye olden daze I could drag belo
I need to keep xdm running, and runnable, but I also want
X to stop listening on port 1029. Twiddling a firewall won't
do; this needs to be done at the origin. Using startx won't
do. lsof shows me X, xconsole, xbanner, and xdm all listening
on that port, and I need to make them stop.
X is, unf
23 matches
Mail list logo
