Re: Business Plans

2001-05-28 Thread Tom Rauschenbach
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Jeffry Smith wrote: > Benjamin Scott opined: > >On 27 May 2001, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote: > > >> Indeed, but it is entirely possible that one company will subcontract > for > >> Ah, you have illustrated my point nicely. Thank you ;-). Why hire > >> Linux-specific company whe

Re: Mail client for both Linux and W32

2001-05-28 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Mon, 28 May 2001 10:24:53 EDT "Kenneth E. Lussier" said: >The only one's that I can think of are Netscape, Mozilla, and Pine. Mahogany is supposedly pretty decent, but I have no personal experience. -- Seeya, Paul "I always explain our company via interpretive

Re: Business Plans

2001-05-28 Thread Jeffry Smith
Benjamin Scott opined: >On 27 May 2001, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote: >> Indeed, but it is entirely possible that one company will subcontract for >> Ah, you have illustrated my point nicely. Thank you ;-). Why hire >> Linux-specific company when you can hire a "GC" like Taos, Modis, >> Collective T

Re: Speaking of sendmail...

2001-05-28 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Mon, 28 May 2001 00:46:36 EDT Derek Martin said: >On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 10:46:18PM -0400, Kurth Bemis wrote: >> >> Ah - i see your problem. your running sendmail. :-) gotta love those >> cryptic, gotta-upgrade-every-two-days, monolithic MTAs :-) [...snip...] >As for it be

Re: Mail and Linux

2001-05-28 Thread Tom Rauschenbach
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Benjamin Scott wrote: > On 27 May 2001, Ed Robitaille wrote: > > One of the nice things about the fetchmail->procmail->mutt->sendmail(?) > > is that procmail puts weeds out a lot of chaff > > I agree, and use fetchmail and procmail in a similar configuration myself. > At

Re: Mail and Linux

2001-05-28 Thread Benjamin Scott
On 27 May 2001, Ed Robitaille wrote: > One of the nice things about the fetchmail->procmail->mutt->sendmail(?) > is that procmail puts weeds out a lot of chaff I agree, and use fetchmail and procmail in a similar configuration myself. At work, final delivery is done on a mail server which is

Re: Mail client for both Linux and W32

2001-05-28 Thread Derek Martin
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 11:30:16AM -0400, Hartnett wrote: > I think Mahogany has versions for multiple platforms, Edora might as > well. > Unfortunately, there is no Linux version of Eudora. I will have to look into Mahogany, but the name sounds familiar... I think I may have come across this

Re: Mail client for both Linux and W32

2001-05-28 Thread Jerry Feldman
I specifically checked Eudora, and they do not have a Unix/Linux client. Neither does Pegasus. "Hartnett" wrote: > I think Mahogany has versions for multiple platforms, Edora might as > well. -- Jerry Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org

MTA flamewar

2001-05-28 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Kurth Bemis wrote: > Ah - i see your problem. your running sendmail. :-) gotta love those > cryptic, gotta-upgrade-every-two-days, monolithic MTAs :-) #ifdef FLAME Ed has a problem which Sendmail is not well-suited to solve. I've asked no less than *three times* in the

Re: Mail client for both Linux and W32

2001-05-28 Thread Hartnett
I think Mahogany has versions for multiple platforms, Edora might as well. On Mon, 28 May 2001 10:24:53 -0400, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote: >The only one's that I can think of are Netscape, Mozilla, and Pine. > >C-Ya, >Kenny > >Randy Edwards wrote: >> >>Can someone suggest a mail client which

Re: Mail client for both Linux and W32

2001-05-28 Thread Bob Bell
mutt will also run in Windows, using CygWin. To pull mail from the server, however, you'd have to use fetchmail. I'm not sure if that runs in CygWin. http://unixmail-w32.sourceforge.net/ On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:24:53AM -0400, Kenneth E. Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only one's th

Re: Linus on NHPR

2001-05-28 Thread Bobnhlinux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > "Karl J. Runge" wrote: > > > What are the legal implications to reverse-engineering their format and > > making our own clients and servers? > > Programmers giveth, and the DMCA taketh away. It's illegal. DeCSS was > designed for completely legal compatibility r

Re: Mail client for both Linux and W32

2001-05-28 Thread Jerry Feldman
Some solutions might be to use a virtual machine, such as Win4Lin. I think the current version of Win4Lin can use your Winmodem. Netscape is another solution. Netscape uses the standard RFC822 mailbox format. However, there might be a problem with line endings. DOS based text files use crlf to

Re: Mail client for both Linux and W32

2001-05-28 Thread Kenneth E. Lussier
The only one's that I can think of are Netscape, Mozilla, and Pine. C-Ya, Kenny Randy Edwards wrote: > >Can someone suggest a mail client which runs under both Linux and Win32 > and which uses the same file format directory structure in each? > >This is for a laptop with a WinModem wh

Re: Linus on NHPR

2001-05-28 Thread Randy Edwards
> They will become standards if we all use it. > We should start demanding the use of open standards, Bingo. I think we need to start talking more about open standards. A great example is IM programs. These are increasingly popular with everyone (half the people at work spend huge amount

Mail client for both Linux and W32

2001-05-28 Thread Randy Edwards
Can someone suggest a mail client which runs under both Linux and Win32 and which uses the same file format directory structure in each? This is for a laptop with a WinModem where one must dial out in Windows to the ISP and send/receive mail. However, the desire is to actually read/reply t

Re: Linus on NHPR

2001-05-28 Thread Bobnhlinux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > The operative word there is standard. > There are open projects out there, like Ogg Vorbis, but I > don't know that they have any real chance at becoming a widely > accepted standard over the various proprietary formats. > They will become standards if we all use i

Re: off_topic question ( AIX )

2001-05-28 Thread Rich Payne
On Sun, 27 May 2001, cdowns wrote: > does anyone know a mailing list or good link to actual documentation ?> > unlike that of IBM's site.. If I remember correctly all of the AIX docs are online, it's been a while since I accessed them, but everything should be there as well as on the docs DC