In a message dated: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 23:01:22 EST
Joshua S. Freeman said:
anyone on this list have experience setting up LDAP for a large-ish (+/-
1500 employees, +/- 20 departments) institution?
I've recently been tasked with just such a job and I know squat about
LDAP... starting to read up,
Hi,
Some of you may remember the talk I did last Nov. at the MELBA meeting.
The basic idea is that one uses ssh to connect to work, say, and redirect
a bunch of ports (login shells, X window apps, webserver, etc) to yield
a poor man's VPN between the two points.
For a couple of weeks I'll need
Karl J. Runge wrote:
Some of you may remember the talk I did last Nov. at the MELBA meeting.
The basic idea is that one uses ssh to connect to work, say, and redirect
a bunch of ports (login shells, X window apps, webserver, etc) to yield
a poor man's VPN between the two points.
For a
Yes, I use VNC a good deal for certain tasks in my current telecommuting
(via cable modem) and will definitely be using it under my upcoming dialup
situation.
However, I think doing a full day of work at = 33 Kb/s thru VNC will
prove too frustrating and tedious (even with something like
I noticed my domainname would not resolve for most of the day and I got
got a whole bunch of mailer-daemon messages. I apologize to all who
received similar errors due to problems with my domain.
Have we had any discussion on the list on the policy of where errors
should be directed? We seem
Well, it should definitely NOT bounce back to the OP, as there is nothing we
can do about it.
And I'm sure the list administrator doesn't want to deal with every bounced
message; it's annoying enough for me to have to deal with errors on the few
posts I make.
I would say direct them to a
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Karl J. Runge wrote:
So I know I will be using a bunch of local xterms containing remote shells
for the bulk of my work. It will be interesting to see if I can cook up a
way to suspend restore them...
screen(1) provides detachable, transportable terminal emulations,
Since VNC is good for resuming sessions after disconnects, or even moving to
a different client, how about setting up a low res desktop account or two,
maybe with nothing more than an xterm on it, for the bulk of the stuff where
you can get away with the command line?
That, coupled with tightVNC
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Karl J. Runge wrote:
Have we had any discussion on the list on the policy of where errors
should be directed?
Yes. Several.
The problem is a political one, not a technical one. The situation is not
going to change. Yes, that is too bad.
I believe Steven Orr told
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, mike ledoux wrote:
# tar cBlf - . | (cd /mnt/tmp tar xBspf -)
Why not cp -a? Are you just used to old-school Unix, or is there
something wrong with cp we should know about?
Also, if one is well and truly paranoid, one could shutdown and power
off, power back on,
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Derek D. Martin wrote:
Note, this was a bug, and not the expected/desirable behavior.
I'm not sure you could convince RH of that, but agreed... ;-)
Just because it wasn't expected by you and Paul does not mean it is a bug.
Red Hat isn't the only distro that does this,
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Chad R. Henry wrote:
Need a 75ft Cat5e crossover cable. Any ideas on local sources?
If you are local to my employer, I would recommend us. Call for pricing.
|
|
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is a political one, not a technical one. The situation is not
going to change. Yes, that is too bad.
:-(
Errors-To is non-standard and depreciated. The proper solution is to
set the SMTP envelope FROM address
I've used the 'dislocate' script that comes bundled with
Expect (Don Libes's extenstion to Tcl/Tk). It's been a
while, so I may remember it as working better than it
actually did, but as long as you remembered to explicitly
disconnect your shell sessions, you could pick them back
up from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Benjamin Scott hath spake thusly:
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Derek D. Martin wrote:
Note, this was a bug, and not the expected/desirable behavior.
I'm not sure you could convince RH of that, but agreed... ;-)
Just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Bill Studley hath spake thusly:
Classless in-addr.arpa delegation allows administrators to
provide authoritative reverse DNS on subnets that don't fall on
octet boundaries.
Yes, this is precisely the trick I was referring
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Benjamin Scott hath spake thusly:
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, mike ledoux wrote:
# tar cBlf - . | (cd /mnt/tmp tar xBspf -)
Why not cp -a? Are you just used to old-school Unix, or is there
something wrong with cp we
Derek D. Martin wrote:
At some point hitherto, Benjamin Scott hath spake thusly:
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, mike ledoux wrote:
# tar cBlf - . | (cd /mnt/tmp tar xBspf -)
Why not cp -a? Are you just used to old-school Unix, or is there
something wrong with cp we should know about?
mike ledoux wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 09:54:27PM -0500, Benjamin Scott wrote:
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, mike ledoux wrote:
# tar cBlf - . | (cd /mnt/tmp tar xBspf -)
Why not cp -a? Are you just used to old-school Unix, or is there
19 matches
Mail list logo
