Re: Off Topic - Windows Browsers.

2001-10-16 Thread Derek Doucette
How about the opera windows port, I have been running it pretty effectively with only a few formatting errors here and there, overall very happy, and it is fast. I think you can get an e-mail client for this, but I haven't used nor heard anything about it. I use Eudora, and the only problem I

Re: Off Topic - Windows Browsers.

2001-10-16 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 15:15:52 EDT Benjamin Scott said: > (I find it ironic that Microsoft is finally including a Telnet server, >just as the Unix community is moving away from Telnet in favor of SSH.) Why? they've consistently been about 10 years behind everyone else! > We tri

Re: Off Topic - Windows Browsers.

2001-10-16 Thread Thomas M. Albright
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Greg Kettmann wrote: > Regardless, any suggestions for a new browser / mail client? I Have you tried Netscape 6.1? It's basically the closed-source version of mozilla. -- Thomas M. Albright (Linux user number 234357) Amendment IV The right of the people to be secu

Re: Off Topic - Windows Browsers.

2001-10-16 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Derek D. Martin wrote: > Oh, I forgot to mention that, and there's also a port of Mutt. And both > are character based so you can telnet in and -- oh, right, windows. LOL! Hmmm, I wonder if Pine/Mutt/whatever would work under the Telnet server included with Windows 2000

Re: Off Topic - Windows Browsers.

2001-10-16 Thread Derek D. Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 02:05:00PM -0400, Benjamin Scott wrote: > Pine is available for MS-Windows. What more do you need? ;-) Oh, I forgot to mention that, and there's also a port of Mutt. And both are character based so you can telnet in and -

Re: Off Topic - Windows Browsers.

2001-10-16 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Greg Kettmann wrote: > Netscape (4.77) has become more problematic lately though. It keeps > crashing saying it can't write to a memory location. Turn off Java. Netscape 4.x's Java Virtual Machine sucks rocks, to put it mildly. > Regardless, any suggestions for a new bro

Re: Off Topic - Windows Browsers.

2001-10-16 Thread Derek D. Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 11:12:40AM -0400, Greg Kettmann wrote: > As much as I love Linux as a Server I've problems with it as a desktop > (missing applications). Not a complaint, I suppose it's more of an > apology :-) . My primary work platform is

Re: Off Topic - Windows Browsers.

2001-10-16 Thread Michael O'Donnell
http://browserwatch.internet.com/ http://www.webstandards.org/upgrade/index_n4.html http://www.browserlist.browser.org/browser_list.shtml ** To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the

Off Topic - Windows Browsers.

2001-10-16 Thread Greg Kettmann
As much as I love Linux as a Server I've problems with it as a desktop (missing applications). Not a complaint, I suppose it's more of an apology :-) . My primary work platform is still winblows. I refuse to use M$ Internet Explorer and Outlook. Netscape (4.77) has become more problematic late