On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 5:06pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> While standing on systemA you say:
>
> When I do that the case sort of crumples.
I guess the system's load average was too high.
--
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 17:46, you wrote:
> > > While standing on systemA you say:
> >
> > When I do that the case sort of crumples.
>
> Yup - we professionals refer to that
> as "converting to lower case"
Really ? I've always talked about "data compression".
>
> ___
> > While standing on systemA you say:
>
> When I do that the case sort of crumples.
Yup - we professionals refer to that
as "converting to lower case"
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-d
Michael O'Donnell writes:
>While standing on systemA you say:
When I do that the case sort of crumples.
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Neal Richardson hath spake thusly:
> I have swapped out motherboards using windows me and after several ok
> like 10 reboots it did in fact work fine.
I've done this with win98 as well, but with varying success. It
/usually/
Hi all,
Just a reminder that we have another topic-less meeting tonight:
Who:Anyone who wants to show up :)
What: Who knows, we'll make it up as we go along
When: 19:30ish (for dinner, show up between 17:30-18:00)
Where: Martha's Exchange, 2nd floor (Dinner, in the restaurant)
In a message dated: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:10:42 EDT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> *exasperated sigh*
That makes two of us :)
(ever try getting something which *should* be very straight-forward
working *and* tend to the needs of an infant!? :)
> In your examples, you use -R instead of -L, and you
On 25 Sep 2002, at 3:35pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have swapped out motherboards using windows me and after several ok like
> 10 reboots it did in fact work fine.
The system will run. However, the device tree in the registry will be
invalid. Or so claimed MS PSS. Remember, MS-Windows is
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 3:36pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> pll@tater:~$ ssh taz -R 8110:199.174.114.33:110
> pll@tater:~$ fetchmail -vc lanminds.com --port 8110 --protocol pop3
*exasperated sigh*
My workstation is named DRAGON. Our mail server is named ITCHY. Say the
intermedia
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:40:11PM -0400, Bob Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:36:21PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've got plenty open, but it doesn't seem to be working the way I
> > expect it to (of course, maybe my expectations are out
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 3:30pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, you do. Unfortunately, ssh ties up a terminal whenever you do a port
> redirection; i.e. you must log into the system to do this.
If this really bothers people that much, and you are using SSH protocol
version 2 (and you *are* doi
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:36:21PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've got plenty open, but it doesn't seem to be working the way I
> expect it to (of course, maybe my expectations are out of line :)
>
> On tater:
>
> pll@tater:~$ ssh taz -R 8110:199.174.114.33:
In a message dated: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:40:07 EDT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 3:09pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Is this supposed to be a single command line, or 2 separate ones?
>
> Two separate ones, both executed on 'A'.
>
>> I would guess 2 separate ones, yet when I do
I have swapped out motherboards using windows me and after several ok
like 10 reboots it did in fact work fine.
-Neal Richardson
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 15:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 3:05pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > BTW, for small money you can pick up a 3.5 to 2.5
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 2:52pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> which is slightly different than:
>
> pop.paul.com listens on port 110
> I want the box I'm sshing -to- to listen on 110 and
> connect me with pop.paul.com
> so I do:
> ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
I've had better luck moving a hard drive from one system to another but I
like your idea better. Basically, repartition and format the drive as a
bootable system disk (MS-DOS) and then copy the Windows kit to a directory
on the drive. That would certainly work and I've done that before too. One
ni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, [EMAIL PROTECTED] hath spake thusly:
> >ssh pll@system-b -L 8110:pop-server:110
> >fetchmail --protocol POP3 --port 8110 localhost
>
> Is this supposed to be a single command line, or 2 separate ones?
Two.
>
> I would guess
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 3:09pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is this supposed to be a single command line, or 2 separate ones?
Two separate ones, both executed on 'A'.
> I would guess 2 separate ones, yet when I do:
> ssh pll@system-b -L 8110:pop-server:110
> I end up logged into system-b
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 3:05pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> BTW, for small money you can pick up a 3.5 to 2.5 hard driver adaptor.
Yes. I paid about $12 for my 44-pin adapter. :)
> Then you can install Windows to the 2.5 drive setup as master on another
> box.
It is a much better idea to e
In a message dated: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:02:09 EDT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> For example:
>
>ssh pll@system-b -L 8110:pop-server:110
>fetchmail --protocol POP3 --port 8110 localhost
Is this supposed to be a single command line, or 2 separate ones?
I would guess 2 separate ones, yet when I do:
BTW, for small money you can pick up a 3.5 to 2.5 hard driver adaptor. Then
you can install Windows to the 2.5 drive setup as master on another box.
When that is complete, move the drive back to the laptop where you will
likely go through several rounds of "found new hardware" and reboot cycles.
A
Just a reminder that the Boston User Groups Megameeting is tonight:
When: 9/25/2002 6:30PM
Where:Sheraton Tara, 1657 Worcester Road, Framingham, MA
WHO WILL PRESENT? ? Bob Davis, former CEO of Lycos and Terra Lycos, and
currently a venture partner at Highland Capital Partners, will present
Stre
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ssh pll@system-b -L 8110:pop-server:110
> fetchmail --protocol POP3 --port 8110 localhost
I thought -L was for the other forwarding.. for example:
mail.blackavar.com listens on port 25
I want the box I'm SSHing from to listen on port
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 2:38pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have to remove Linux and install Windows from a Dell Latitude LS laptop
> that currently houses Red Hat 7 with grub as the boot loader. This
> computer has no floppy or internal cdrom, just a pcmcia card with a Sony
> Vaio cd player att
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 1:53pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - run fetchmail on system A, which will redirect the query to system B.
> - have system B intercept that query and pass it on to the
> proper pop server on the net
> - take the mail off the server using B, but p
I have to remove Linux and install Windows from a Dell Latitude LS laptop that
currently houses Red Hat 7 with grub as the boot loader. This computer has
no floppy or internal cdrom, just a pcmcia card with a Sony Vaio cd player
attached. The machine can't boot from this until the pcmcia modul
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - run fetchmail on system A, which will redirect the query to system B.
> - have system B intercept that query and pass it on to the
> proper pop server on the net
> - take the mail off the server using B, but pass it back
>IOW, I want to:
>
>- run fetchmail on system A, which will redirect the query to system B.
>- have system B intercept that query and pass it on to the
> proper pop server on the net
>- take the mail off the server using B, but pass it back to
> syste
Hi all,
I have a system which is not directly connected to the 'net, but
which has direct access to one which does, but is not acting as a
router. I need to get some e-mail off a pop server on the 'net onto
the system which is not directly connected. Is there anyway to use
ssh to redirect
Hi all,
Just a reminder that we have another topic-less meeting tonight:
Who:Anyone who wants to show up :)
What: Who knows, we'll make it up as we go along
When: 19:30ish (for dinner, show up between 17:30-18:00)
Where: Martha's Exchange, 2nd floor (Dinner, in the restaurant)
Bob Bell wrote:
>
>
> order deny,allow
> deny from all
> allow from 10.0.0.
>
>
>
> order allow,deny
> allow from all
>
That's your problem. takes a simple filename, not a complete
path. Change this to:
order deny,allow
deny from all
allow from 10.0.0.
> Anybody know how I can serve the same filesystem to
> multiple NFS clients as their root? The problem I'm
The NFS root HOWTO describes how you can do it. I believe
they even provide some scripts to help. They play games
with symbolic links so the clients have private areas
of needed directo
>Anybody know how I can serve the same filesystem to
>multiple NFS clients as their root? The problem I'm
>anticipating is that each client would assume it had
>that filesystem to itself and overwrite modifications
>already made by other clients. I can imagine various
>hax and trickery I might
Take a look at what the Linux Terminal Server Project is
doing (ltsp.org). They've been doing net booting for
at least two years. It's been a while since I played
with it, but they must have addressed this issue
already.
-Mark
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:54:34AM -0400, Michael O'Donnell wrote:
I'd like to restrict access to on Apache so that:
1) Access to the immediate contents of the directory "photo" are
restricted to non-local IPs, except
2) Access is granted to "index.cgi", to use as the default, and
3) Access is granted to subdirectories of "photo"
I would have thought the fol
Anybody know how I can serve the same filesystem to
multiple NFS clients as their root? The problem I'm
anticipating is that each client would assume it had
that filesystem to itself and overwrite modifications
already made by other clients. I can imagine various
hax and trickery I might commit
36 matches
Mail list logo