Re: KVM cards

2002-10-08 Thread Kenneth E. Lussier
I have never heard of such a beast. However, this is why I insist that any machine that has an OS on it that does not allow serial port access must have VNC on it. C-Ya, Kenny On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 22:08, Michael O'Donnell wrote: > > Let's say there's a machine (probably out at some > customer

Re: RH 8.0 Question

2002-10-08 Thread Thomas M. Albright
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Ken Ambrose wrote: > Apparently, it ain't there. The way I do it (I'm in 7.x, but I don't see > why it wouldn't work) is: > > 1) Kill my current window manager (eg. "killall sawfish") > 2) Startup up the window manager I want ("nohup enlightenment&") > 3) Save my session (Fo

Re: Red Hat's Bluecurve (was: Red Hat 8.0 is 'official')

2002-10-08 Thread pll
In a message dated: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 19:08:59 EDT Randy Edwards said: >>> Debian rules, RH Sucks >>> vi is for wimps >>> Linux > >> Hm, can't really find much to disagree with. > >Inconsistent rubbish. Any *real* Debianer knows it's GNU/Linux -- just >like Debian prints on its

Re: RH 8.0 Question

2002-10-08 Thread Ben Boulanger
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Thomas M. Albright wrote: > Does anyone have an opinion on KDE in RH 8? I may end up switching... That's what I'm running. I think it's very nicely done.. I even finally got my fiancee to switch from XP to linux due to her seeing KDE on my box. Ben -- Keep your broken

Re: Complexity and user confusion (was: Red Hat's Bluecurve)

2002-10-08 Thread bscott
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, at 1:59am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> First, I agree with you,. Removing options just for the sake of >> dumbing-down the UI is, well, dumb. > > The GNOME developers don't agree... Is there a URL to information on this stated goal of eliminating features? I am curious

Re: KVM cards

2002-10-08 Thread bscott
Hi Kenny, How goes the battle? I haven't seen or heard much of you lately. [Self-Appointed Net.Cop Mode = ON ] On 8 Oct 2002, at 8:21am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have never heard of such a beast. However, this is why I insist that > any machine that has an OS on it that does not allow se

Re: KVM cards

2002-10-08 Thread Kenneth E. Lussier
On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 09:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Kenny, > > How goes the battle? I haven't seen or heard much of you lately. Hi Ben, I'd doing pretty good. Been pretty busy, so I haven't had much time to participate. > [Self-Appointed Net.Cop Mode = ON ] > > On 8 Oct 2002, at 8:2

Re: KVM cards

2002-10-08 Thread bscott
On 8 Oct 2002, at 9:27am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ooops See what happens when I'm away for a while? First, I don't > answer the person that I responded to, then I completely ruin Ben's day > with poor netiquette... Hmmm... Today's looking up after all ;-) That's okay, I fscked up and sen

Re: RH 8.0 Question

2002-10-08 Thread Randy Edwards
Ben Boulanger wrote: > I even finally got my fiancee to switch from XP to linux [...] Then she's definitely a keeper. :-) -- "If the current stylistic distinctions between open-source and commercial software persist, an open-software revolution could lead to yet another divide between hav

Re: OpenLDAP book?

2002-10-08 Thread pll
In a message dated: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 13:46:12 PDT Ken Ambrose said: >Hey, all. It appears to me that OpenLDAP has an almost complete dearth of >dead-tree documentation. Is this true? Ayup! I've been looking for a good book on LDAP of *any* kind for a couple of years now. There are a 3 or

Re: Version inflation (was: Red Hat's Bluecurve (was: ...))

2002-10-08 Thread pll
In a message dated: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 17:26:37 EDT "Matthew J. Brodeur" said: >On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> What do mean by that? Solaris is still on 2.x, 2.9 just got released? >> >> (Remember, it's only the output of 'uname' that matters, since we >> tech weenies never pa

Re: RH 8.0 Question

2002-10-08 Thread Matthew J. Brodeur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Derek D. Martin wrote: > There is no mechanism provided by GNOME 2 to change your window manager. As I pointed out to you (Derek) in a private mail (which I probably haven't yet sent), this isn't true. The "right" way to swi

Re: Why Linux? (was: Red Hat's Bluecurve)

2002-10-08 Thread pll
In a message dated: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 00:47:28 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, at 3:24pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Apparently, it is a friggin' *stated goal* to remove many configuration >>> options from Gnome. >> >> So where's the value add to switch from MS? Sure, there's

Re: Complexity and user confusion (was: Red Hat's Bluecurve)

2002-10-08 Thread pll
In a message dated: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 09:07:25 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >>> I have seen user levels implemented in only two places: Once was the >>> venerable GeoWorks (nee PC/GEOS) GUI for MS-DOS. The other is in the >>> "Nautilus" system browser. >> >> If this ever did exist in Nautilus, i

Re: RH 8.0 Question

2002-10-08 Thread Paul Iadonisi
On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 22:14, Thomas M. Albright wrote: > OK, where does one change the window manager in Gnome in Red Hat 8? > > I can't find it in any of the Preferences or Settings menus. Well, well, well. After post my rant yesterday, I took a look at the latest Gnome Summary just publishe

Re: OpenLDAP book?

2002-10-08 Thread Tom Buskey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > >In a message dated: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 13:46:12 PDT >Ken Ambrose said: > >>Hey, all. It appears to me that OpenLDAP has an almost complete dearth of >>dead-tree documentation. Is this true? > >Ayup! I've been looking for a good book on LDAP of *any* kind for a >coupl

Re: Why Linux? (was: Red Hat's Bluecurve)

2002-10-08 Thread Chris
> Most people purchase a computer and get MS because that's what they > use at work or at school. If Linux can penetrate the corporate > environment and people get used to that at work or school, they'll start > getting it at home as well. > After all, isn't that how Unix originally became so ub