On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 19:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd be willing to bet the software in question has hard-coded terminal
> control sequences embedded in it, or, at best, that it has its own, private
> database of terminal control sequences, and ignores termcap/terminfo
> entirely. The term
Tonights talk will cover most of the functionallity of the Evolution
Mail client.
The meeting will be held on the UNH Durham campus Morse Hall rm 301 at
7pm. Directions can be found on the http://slug.gnhlug.org website.
--
--
Robert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, at 10:55pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't write proposals to increase the use of Linux. Write proposals to
save (or make) the company money. When appropriate, work Linux or other
Free/Open Source Software into those proposals.
Excellent point.
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, at 5:20pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ... It uses an ancient curses based interface ... Everything works
> correctly though when connecting with a terminal emulator that only
> supports telnet connections ...
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, at 5:45pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ... No, t
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, at 10:55pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was just curious if anyone has had any success with writing a proposal
> for their company to increase the use of Linux.
Don't write proposals to increase the use of Linux. Write proposals to
save (or make) the company money. When a
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 17:27, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Yes, but can you first log in as a regular user then either su or sudo
> or sux?
Ah, sorry, forgot to answer that. No, the application runs as a
captive login. (When you login the application s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes, but can you first log in as a regular user then either su or sudo
or sux?
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 17:20:18 -0400
Dan Coutu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 17:10, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash:
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 17:10, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:58:45 -0400
> Dan Coutu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > First of all, I know this isn't a great idea, but it is required
> > by a specific scenario. Here's the situation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:58:45 -0400
Dan Coutu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First of all, I know this isn't a great idea, but it is required
> by a specific scenario. Here's the situation:
>
> Got a RedHat 9 system that I need to allow remote telnet lo
Dan Coutu wrote:
First of all, I know this isn't a great idea, but it is required
by a specific scenario. Here's the situation:
I thought I had made myself perfectly clear that I understand ssh is
better than telnet. Due to circumstances way beyond my control I
Well... to be fair (to myself) i
Dan Coutu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Got a RedHat 9 system that I need to allow remote telnet logins
> to root from the LAN. I had thought that an entry in
> /etc/security/access.conf would do the trick but it didn't. I also
> went to /etc/xinetd.d and edited the telnet file to enable telnet.
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 16:23, Jared Watkins wrote:
> Dan Coutu wrote:
>
> >Got a RedHat 9 system that I need to allow remote telnet logins
> >to root from the LAN. I had thought that an entry in
> >
> >
> What about using sssh? If you can then simply enable root logins in
> /etc/ssh/sshd_config
Dan Coutu wrote:
Got a RedHat 9 system that I need to allow remote telnet logins
to root from the LAN. I had thought that an entry in
What about using sssh? If you can then simply enable root logins in
/etc/ssh/sshd_config
Using telnet is a bad idea... it continues a bad habit. SSH with
pa
First of all, I know this isn't a great idea, but it is required
by a specific scenario. Here's the situation:
Got a RedHat 9 system that I need to allow remote telnet logins
to root from the LAN. I had thought that an entry in
/etc/security/access.conf would do the trick but it didn't. I also
wen
14 matches
Mail list logo
