Derek Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ...which is precisely what I wanted to know! He seemed unsure which
> he was running... The command I gave was tailor-made to determine
> that, and revealed that he was running autofs, but not amd.
>
> There's no point in looking at amd stuff, if he's n
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 09:15:16PM -0500, Paul Lussier wrote:
> Derek Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Are you using IPSec now? I heard that FreeS/Wan forked... What code
> > base are you using? Pointers would be useful. =8^)
>
> OpenBSD.org :)
>
> It's the most secure, most stable O
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 09:27:58PM -0500, Paul Lussier wrote:
> Derek Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What is the output of the following command on both
> > boxes?
> >
> > ls /etc/rc.d/rc3.d |egrep "autofs|amd"
>
> Hmm, personally I would have just done:
>
> ls /etc/init.d/a*
Derek Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the output of the following command on both
> boxes?
>
> ls /etc/rc.d/rc3.d |egrep "autofs|amd"
Hmm, personally I would have just done:
ls /etc/init.d/a*
especially since an ls of /etc/rc3.d is likely to reveal only a bunch
of symlinks
"Michael ODonnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you have NIS installed you should (by convention) be
> able to say:
>
>ypcat auto.master
>
> ...to see which maps are available for your use.
Actually, the better way is 'ypwhich -m' I believe, as there may be
maps not in auto.master, or aut
Derek Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are you using IPSec now? I heard that FreeS/Wan forked... What code
> base are you using? Pointers would be useful. =8^)
OpenBSD.org :)
It's the most secure, most stable OS out there right now, and IPSec is
built-in to the default kernel. I'm in th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 07:49 pm, you wrote:
Looking through my devices, it seems to be listed under the SCSI area.
The Kernel version is 2.4 (as returned via the kernelversion command).
Just a guess, you're probably using an IDE CD-ROM drive with SCSI emulation.
Kenny Donahue wrote:
Derek Martin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 02:50:08PM -0500, Kenny Donahue wrote:
Ok, let's backtrack a couple of steps...
Can you mount the exported filesystems manually?
Sorry. yes, this works.
Which raises another point: do your mount points exist on your new
m
Derek Martin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 02:50:08PM -0500, Kenny Donahue wrote:
Ok, let's backtrack a couple of steps...
Can you mount the exported filesystems manually?
Sorry. yes, this works.
Which raises another point: do your mount points exist on your new
machine? Autofs norm
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 02:50:08PM -0500, Kenny Donahue wrote:
> >Ok, let's backtrack a couple of steps...
> >
> >Can you mount the exported filesystems manually?
You didn't answer this question... It's important. If you can't
mount the filesystem manually, you're never going to get autofs to do
> That seems really unlikely; autofs (automounter) and amd are two
> different methods of accomplishing the same thing... It would be
> strange to be using both at the same time. autofs is generally
> considered to be the better of the two, so chances are that's what
> you're using, not amd.
Michael ODonnell wrote:
Try saying "ypcat auto.master"
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
auto_usr -bg
-host-bg
auto_home -bg
auto_os -bg
auto_web -bg
Thanks,
To find out what's installed on a Debian
box, I often define this function:
function dlgrep() {
# dpkg list grep
COLUMNS=300 dpkg -l | tr -s '[:blank:]' ' ' | grep $*
}
...which you could use thus:
dlgrep -i autofs
dlgrep -i amd
If you have NIS installed you should
Try saying "ypcat auto.master"
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Derek Martin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 02:06:58PM -0500, Kenny Donahue wrote:
If you're relying on files, you'll need to copy /etc/auto.* from a
working machine. It's been a long while since I supported autofs and
NIS, but I think that'll do it.
That's what I did I even copied his /
Derek Martin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 02:00:37PM -0500, Kenny Donahue wrote:
I know diddly about network stuff so I'll do my best to answer.
I'm using NIS, autofs and amd (I think).
That seems really unlikely; autofs (automounter) and amd are two
different methods of accomplishing the
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 02:06:58PM -0500, Kenny Donahue wrote:
> >If you're relying on files, you'll need to copy /etc/auto.* from a
> >working machine. It's been a long while since I supported autofs and
> >NIS, but I think that'll do it.
>
> That's what I did I even copied his /etc/nsswitch.conf
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 02:00:37PM -0500, Kenny Donahue wrote:
> I know diddly about network stuff so I'll do my best to answer.
> I'm using NIS, autofs and amd (I think).
That seems really unlikely; autofs (automounter) and amd are two
different methods of accomplishing the same thing... It woul
Derek Martin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:15:24PM -0500, Kenny Donahue wrote:
Hi all,
I just switched from RH 7.2 to the latest debian.
Everything seems to be fine except that I can't seem to
automount to the Solaris exported directories on our network.
So you're probably using autofs
I know diddly about network stuff so I'll do my best to answer.
I'm using NIS, autofs and amd (I think).
automounting is configured to use files.
Thanks,
Kenny
Michael ODonnell wrote:
More info, please...
For starters, which automounter thingy are
you trying to use? The amd? autofs?
How do you c
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:15:24PM -0500, Kenny Donahue wrote:
> Hi all,
> I just switched from RH 7.2 to the latest debian.
> Everything seems to be fine except that I can't seem to
> automount to the Solaris exported directories on our network.
So you're probably using autofs and NIS, right?
>
More info, please...
For starters, which automounter thingy are
you trying to use? The amd? autofs?
How do you configure automounting in your
environment? NIS? files?
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gn
Hi all,
I just switched from RH 7.2 to the latest debian.
Everything seems to be fine except that I can't seem to
automount to the Solaris exported directories on our network.
Google searches have been useless. Tons of hits, zero content.
I have access to a machine with working automount so if I ha
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 10:15 -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 08:23:47AM -0500, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
> > There is also the cryptography support. Gone are the
> > days of having to patch the kernel for IPSec.
>
> Interesting indeed. I recently got wireless working on both m
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 08:23:47AM -0500, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
> There is also the cryptography support. Gone are the
> days of having to patch the kernel for IPSec.
Interesting indeed. I recently got wireless working on both my
laptops, though I don't currently have any enryption going on t
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 17:05 -0500, Paul Lussier wrote:
> "Kenneth E. Lussier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mmmm, what reasons are there for upgrading to 2.6 at this point. I've
> thus far treated 2.6 as 'testing/unstable' kernel, and since many of
> it's nicer features (like SATA) are getting
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 23:18 -0500, Randy Edwards wrote:
> > My problem is that some of the drivers I need aren't keeping up with the
> > kernel releases, like the NVIDIA drivers, for instance.
>
>The driver issue in 2.6 has impacted me, though in the other direction.
> 2.6 includes some ne
27 matches
Mail list logo
