Marc Nozell wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 11:35 -0400, Ted Roche wrote:
Is that like Freedom Fries?
Anyone tried this?
https://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/
They are pretty nice. I've installed them on my Ubuntu/Feisty laptop by
just unpacking them into ~/.fonts and running fc-cache.
On May 23, 2007, at 11:32, Ted Roche wrote:
Could we have some on-topic discussions on the list, please?
Somebody verify my syntax, but this ought to work for [mostly]
properly labeled posts:
:0
* ^List-Id:.*gnhlug-discuss.mail.gnhlug.org
* ^Subject:.*OT:|^Subject.*[OT]
/dev/null
I wonder
Bill McGonigle wrote:
On May 23, 2007, at 11:32, Ted Roche wrote:
Could we have some on-topic discussions on the list, please?
Somebody verify my syntax, but this ought to work for [mostly] properly
labeled posts:
In the various MUAs I've used since joining the list, I've had similar
On May 23, 2007, at 11:28, Ben Scott wrote:
Accidentally blowing oneself up is not considered illegal, and, in
your case Travis, could actually be seen as a public service.
Well thank goodness the Law has realized that the value of Travis's
life is fleeting compared with the loss of
Bill McGonigle wrote:
I wonder if we ought to do this with mailman topics rather than
individual procmailrc's?
That is an alternative. One of the other mailing lists I'm on offers
both Tech and Unfiltered versions of the lists, where the Tech
list explicitly filters out OT topics,
DISCLAIMER: Opinions expressed in the below are the personal opinions of the
author, and do not necessarily represent the views or policy of GNHLUG.
On 5/25/07, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... I don't think there's anything wrong with a little OT ...
What Ted said.
I feel it is
On 5/25/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DISCLAIMER: Opinions expressed in the below are the personal opinions of the
author, and do not necessarily represent the views or policy of GNHLUG.
On 5/25/07, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... I don't think there's anything wrong with a
Thomas Charron wrote:
Obviously, the take it offlist conversation needs to be taken offlist. :-P
rof,l! I'll be glad to honor your request!
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 11:37:44AM -0400, Thomas Charron wrote:
On 5/25/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DISCLAIMER: Opinions expressed in the below are the personal opinions of the
author, and do not necessarily represent the views or policy of GNHLUG.
On 5/25/07, Ted Roche [EMAIL
On 5/25/07, mike ledoux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously, the take it offlist conversation needs to be taken offlist. :-P
Can we take the requests to take these conversations offlist offlist please?
Can we take ...
Stack overflow
___
On 5/25/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/25/07, mike ledoux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously, the take it offlist conversation needs to be taken offlist.
:-P
Can we take the requests to take these conversations offlist offlist please?
Can we take ...
Stack overflow
/dilbert/archive/dilbert-20070525.html
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We will stray, as is human. (I'm as guilty as anyone, there. (Of
straying.))
I'm fairly certain you're guilty of being human too :)
--
Seeya,
Paul
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bill McGonigle wrote:
I wonder if we ought to do this with mailman topics rather than
individual procmailrc's?
That is an alternative. One of the other mailing lists I'm on offers
both Tech and Unfiltered versions of the lists, where the Tech
list
14 matches
Mail list logo
