Joshua Judson Rosen writes:
Not that I'm objecting, but more for my own edification: are there
actually systems out there that don't set the sticky bit on /tmp?
That just seems... insane
I can't recall a standard, multi-user Unix-flavored system on which
/tmp didn't have the sticky-bit
A subdir in /tmp can certainly have my ownership and permissions.
And I guess they can't delete the directory because it isn't
empty, but with permissions on the parent directory, can't they
move it?
Picky, picky, picky. Well, for completeness I suppose we should
mention the deleted file
It occurs to me (as I wait for the replacement fror my laptop's WiFi/BT
module *) that there may be a use for that WRT54GL of mine with the blown
WAN port. (mod - you had one too, right?)
Assuming that I can get the radio to connect to the local AP router as a
client (rather than as a peer or
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Michael ODonnell
michael.odonn...@comcast.net wrote:
A subdir in /tmp can certainly have my ownership and permissions.
And I guess they can't delete the directory because it isn't
empty, but with permissions on the parent directory, can't they
move it?
It occurs to me (as I wait for the replacement fror my laptop's
WiFi/BT module *) that there may be a use for that WRT54GL of
mine with the blown WAN port. (mod - you had one too, right?)
Yah, the WAN port on mine failed, as well. I believe there's
nothing special about the port marked WAN
there may be a use for that WRT54GL of mine with
the blown WAN port. (mod - you had one too, right?)
Yah, the WAN port on mine failed, as well.
Hey, wait a minute! ;- I think the one you have *IS*
my old one - I offered it on this channel back in 2009
after the WAN port failed and didn't
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Michael ODonnell
michael.odonn...@comcast.net wrote:
there may be a use for that WRT54GL of mine with
the blown WAN port. (mod - you had one too, right?)
Yah, the WAN port on mine failed, as well.
Hey, wait a minute! ;- I think the one you have *IS*
Back in the day, running telnet inside emacs was faster than in xterm
because of emacs' terminal optimization. Important when you shared a 56k
link. Or 2400 baud modems.
Honestly, I'm at the point I just want low ram use, scroll back lots of
lines, emulate vt100 with line drawing and
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Tom Buskey t...@buskey.name wrote:
Back in the day, running telnet inside emacs was faster than in xterm
because of emacs' terminal optimization. Important when you shared a 56k
link. Or 2400 baud modems.
Honestly, I'm at the point I just want low ram use,
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Bill Freeman ke1g...@gmail.com wrote:
Has /proc become POSIX, or are we drifting into the Linux specific here?
/proc is in Solaris for processes but not anything else. I'd imagine
there's still a way to do this in non-Linux though. Heck, I remember
hitting
FWIW - I recently got a Buffalo that ships with dd-wrt, slightly modified
by Buffalo. It does b/a/g/n too. It definitely can be flashed. They have
some other models that don't.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Bill Freeman ke1g...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:38 AM,
I think this is the 1st time I ever saw Low Ram use and emacs (Eight
Megabytes And Constantly Swapping) in the same paragraph.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Bill Freeman ke1g...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Tom Buskey t...@buskey.name wrote:
Back in the day,
On 2013-05-23 16:36, Tom Buskey wrote:
I think this is the 1st time I ever saw Low Ram use and emacs (Eight
Megabytes And Constantly Swapping) in the same paragraph.
From the JOKES file (or http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed-msg.html), one
of my favorites:
13 matches
Mail list logo
