On 2013-05-23 16:36, Tom Buskey wrote:
> I think this is the 1st time I ever saw Low Ram use and emacs (Eight
> Megabytes And Constantly Swapping) in the same paragraph.
From the JOKES file (or http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed-msg.html), one
of my favorites:
-
I think this is the 1st time I ever saw Low Ram use and emacs (Eight
Megabytes And Constantly Swapping) in the same paragraph.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Bill Freeman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Tom Buskey wrote:
>
>> Back in the day, running telnet inside emacs was f
FWIW - I recently got a Buffalo that ships with dd-wrt, slightly modified
by Buffalo. It does b/a/g/n too. It definitely can be flashed. They have
some other models that don't.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Bill Freeman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Michael ODonnell <
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Bill Freeman wrote:
> Has /proc become POSIX, or are we drifting into the Linux specific here?
>
>>
>>
/proc is in Solaris for processes but not anything else. I'd imagine
there's still a way to do this in non-Linux though. Heck, I remember
hitting the non dele
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Tom Buskey wrote:
> Back in the day, running telnet inside emacs was faster than in xterm
> because of emacs' terminal optimization. Important when you shared a 56k
> link. Or 2400 baud modems.
>
> Honestly, I'm at the point I just want low ram use, scroll back
Back in the day, running telnet inside emacs was faster than in xterm
because of emacs' terminal optimization. Important when you shared a 56k
link. Or 2400 baud modems.
Honestly, I'm at the point I just want low ram use, scroll back lots of
lines, emulate vt100 with line drawing and increase/sh
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Michael ODonnell <
michael.odonn...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
> >> there may be a use for that WRT54GL of mine with
> >> the blown WAN port. (mod - you had one too, right?)
> >
> >Yah, the WAN port on mine failed, as well.
>
> Hey, wait a minute! ;-> I think the o
>> there may be a use for that WRT54GL of mine with
>> the blown WAN port. (mod - you had one too, right?)
>
>Yah, the WAN port on mine failed, as well.
Hey, wait a minute! ;-> I think the one you have *IS*
my old one - I offered it on this channel back in 2009
after the WAN port failed and di
> It occurs to me (as I wait for the replacement fror my laptop's
> WiFi/BT module *) that there may be a use for that WRT54GL of
> mine with the blown WAN port. (mod - you had one too, right?)
Yah, the WAN port on mine failed, as well. I believe there's
nothing special about the port marked W
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Michael ODonnell <
michael.odonn...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
> > A subdir in /tmp can certainly have my ownership and permissions.
> > And I guess they can't delete the directory because it isn't
> > empty, but with permissions on the parent directory, can't they
>
It occurs to me (as I wait for the replacement fror my laptop's WiFi/BT
module *) that there may be a use for that WRT54GL of mine with the blown
WAN port. (mod - you had one too, right?)
Assuming that I can get the radio to connect to the local AP router as a
client (rather than as a peer or the
> A subdir in /tmp can certainly have my ownership and permissions.
> And I guess they can't delete the directory because it isn't
> empty, but with permissions on the parent directory, can't they
> move it?
Picky, picky, picky. Well, for completeness I suppose we should
mention the "deleted fi
Joshua Judson Rosen writes:
> Not that I'm objecting, but more for my own edification: are there
> actually systems out there that don't set the sticky bit on /tmp?
>
> That just seems... insane
I can't recall a standard, multi-user Unix-flavored system on which
/tmp didn't have the sticky-
13 matches
Mail list logo
