On 06/19/2011 05:16 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
AFAIK, any x86-64 chip still runs 32-bit i386 code just fine. :) I
expect most people asking about 32-bit software are prolly running
their x86-64 hardware in 32-bit mode, for whatever reason. (Inertia
being a big one.)
This is true. Of course
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Jerry Feldman g...@blu.org wrote:
Additionally, AFAIK, neither AMD nor Intel make 32-bit chips any longer.
AFAIK, any x86-64 chip still runs 32-bit i386 code just fine. :) I
expect most people asking about 32-bit software are prolly running
their x86-64
On 06/17/2011 12:25 AM, Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
Indeed--where `whether something is 64bit-clean' was a natural question
to ask a few years back, 64-bit machines were unusual `specialty' hardware,
and many sofware projects just didn't have anyone involved who had
access to such machines...,
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Jerry Feldman g...@blu.org wrote:
The issue with Flash is that the 32-bit flash library will work fine on
a 64-bit system with Firefox 64-bit through a wrapper (nsplugin). Or you
can run the 32-bit Firefox. AFAIK, you can only download 32-but Firefox
directly
Michael ODonnell michael.odonn...@comcast.net writes:
One Year Later: Adobe Abandons 64-bit Linux Again:
http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2011/06/one-year-later-adobe-abandons.html
This decision makes even less sense than it did a year ago.
32-bit processors have effectively become
Since Flash sucked still does
No need to specify the system or the timeframe - most Flash sites I've
found could be programmed with HTML only and be just as good. With
HTML5, no need for Flash (IMHO).
jeff
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Jeffry Smith jsm...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Since Flash sucked still does
No need to specify the system or the timeframe ...
Indeed. Flash is basically a browser crash that also plays videos.
... most Flash sites I've found could be programmed with HTML
only
One Year Later: Adobe Abandons 64-bit Linux Again:
http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2011/06/one-year-later-adobe-abandons.html
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
Nice touch by Adams. Make it easy for the people that will not read the ads
and might generate an extra email complaining.
Dilbert was one of the 1st daily comic strips available on the net. It was
daily in its own usenet group in 1992 sometime.
Another one was Dr. Fun on one of the sunsites
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Ken D'Ambrosio k...@jots.org wrote:
... http://www.dilbert.com/fast/; ...
Scott Adams blogged about this here:
http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/dilbertcom_redesign/
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
On 06-Jun-2011, Benjamin Scott dragonh...@gmail.com sent:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Ken D'Ambrosio k...@jots.org wrote:
... http://www.dilbert.com/fast/; ...
Scott Adams blogged about this here:
http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/dilbertcom_redesign/
IIRC, back in 2008, the redesign in
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Chip Marshall c...@2bithacker.net wrote:
... Flash on Unix/Linux sucked back in the day ...
Nothing's changed, then.
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
I'm not *positive* this is a comment on the Unix philosophy... but, if
not, I can't think of what else it would be. I like comics. I read a
handful of them with regularity. One of these, you'll be shocked to hear,
is Dilbert. Usually, I get my comic fix over at Yahoo, but, sometimes,
some
13 matches
Mail list logo
