On 3/9/07, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Thomas Charron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 3/9/07, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Trac and svn are running as CGIs behind Apache. I have access to the
>> > app-specific config files
Paul Lussier wrote:
What are you doing with svn?
RCS for source code.
Knowing how you use will probably tell me enough to figure out what's
going on.
I use it as a client both from home and from my WebFaction account (when
logged in via ssh). Access is via https, the repository is at
ht
Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My apologies. As I said, I am a linux novice. I actually don't know
> how svn is hosted. Django is definitely mod_python. I'm pretty sure
> Trac is CGI. I'm pretty sure svn is *not* hosted on my private Apache
> and does not have a process running under m
Paul Lussier wrote:
Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Trac and svn are running as CGIs behind Apache. I have access to the
app-specific config files but not the Apache instance that runs them.
What do you mean by this? How is svn run as a CGI behind Apache?
My apologies. As I said,
"Thomas Charron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 3/9/07, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Trac and svn are running as CGIs behind Apache. I have access to the
>> > app-specific config files but not the Apache instance that runs them.
>> What
On 3/9/07, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trac and svn are running as CGIs behind Apache. I have access to the
> app-specific config files but not the Apache instance that runs them.
What do you mean by this? How is svn run as a CGI behind Apac
Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trac and svn are running as CGIs behind Apache. I have access to the
> app-specific config files but not the Apache instance that runs them.
What do you mean by this? How is svn run as a CGI behind Apache?
--
Seeya,
Paul
--
Key fingerprint = 1660 FECC
Christopher Schmidt wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 06:28:29AM -0500, Kent Johnson wrote:
In my new job I am hosting a web site at WebFactional. I thought you
might be interested in some first impressions.
I believe webfaction -- which it looks like is the same thing as
webfactional -- is run b
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 06:28:29AM -0500, Kent Johnson wrote:
>
>
> Ted Roche wrote:
> >A client with a database-backed LAMP application is considering moving
> >to a new hosting provider for their system. Surfing the web, they find
> >all of these $6.95/month deals and can't figure out why an
On Mar 9, 2007, at 6:28 AM, Kent Johnson wrote:
In my new job I am hosting a web site at WebFactional. I thought you
might be interested in some first impressions.
We are hosted at the Shared 1 level ($9.50 / month). At present I am
running a minimal Django app, a Trac site and a Subversion
r
Ted Roche wrote:
A client with a database-backed LAMP application is considering moving
to a new hosting provider for their system. Surfing the web, they find
all of these $6.95/month deals and can't figure out why anyone would pay
more. I know there are a number of folks on the list who pro
Ted Roche wrote:
A client with a database-backed LAMP application is considering
moving to a new hosting provider for their system. Surfing the web,
they find all of these $6.95/month deals and can't figure out why
anyone would pay more. I know there are a number of folks on the list
who pr
On Feb 7, 2007, at 1:57 PM, Python wrote:
You are already getting replies, but here's more.
But everyone has different answers! Better to have many options to
evaluate. Thanks, all, for the ideas!
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com
_
I'd also very strongly recommend checking out site on WebHostingTalk.com
- it's a hangout for industry insiders and those who do a lot of web
hosting.
Take it easy,
David Berube
Berube Consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(603)-485-9622
http://www.berubeconsulting.com/
Python wrote:
You are already
You are already getting replies, but here's more.
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 11:44 -0500, Ted Roche wrote:
> A client with a database-backed LAMP application is considering
> moving to a new hosting provider for their system. Surfing the web,
> they find all of these $6.95/month deals and can't fi
Travis Roy wrote:
From what I've seen most of these >$10/month deals fail for some of
your requirements.
I don't have experience with them myself, but from the information
available on their website it seems WebFaction offers much more than you
indicate below. For $9.50 a month (less if yo
So, what are folks doing, and why?
I don't have any experience with places that do VMs.
As has already been stated, a shared webhosting is not likely to meet a
number of your requirements.
I have shared hosting with Dreamhost (and have for years). They also do
dedicated.
Shared: http://dream
ssage
From: Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: gnhlug User Group
Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2007 11:44:35 AM
Subject: Linux hosting options, pros and cons
A client with a database-backed LAMP application is considering
moving to a new hosting provider for their system. Surfing the web,
th
A client with a database-backed LAMP application is considering
moving to a new hosting provider for their system. Surfing the
web, they find all of these $6.95/month deals and can't figure out
why anyone would pay more. I know there are a number of folks on
the list who provide such ser
A client with a database-backed LAMP application is considering
moving to a new hosting provider for their system. Surfing the web,
they find all of these $6.95/month deals and can't figure out why
anyone would pay more. I know there are a number of folks on the list
who provide such servi
20 matches
Mail list logo
