Alan Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Lloyd Kvam pyt...@venix.com
mailto:pyt...@venix.com wrote:
http://www.intermapper.com
is a local product that is worth considering.
I looked at Internapper years ago when I was running a Wireless ISP and
it looks very nice
Are there no Zenoss fans around here? I use Nagios myself, but thought
Zenoss looked pretty nice and was thinking about giving it a try...
--
Cole Tuininga
Lead Developer
co...@code-energy.com
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
a single data collector.
Does anyone have any experience with network/system monitors that combine
the functionality of Nagios, Cacti, SFlow, etc.? We are looking into
products from Solar Winds and ManageEngines right now, but I would like to
hear from others what they think? I am open to OSS
Tom Buskey wrote:
Exposing the historical graphs to users is a good thing: they can see
the effect of doubling the number of developers on a system.
For historical system information and stats, I personally really like
munin. Nice and easy to set up, generates pretty graphs, extremely
On August 21, 2009, Tom Buskey sent me the following:
Personally, I'd take a well tuned Nagios for alerts and
something else for tracking historical data on graphs. I use
swatch with multitail to watch logfiles on multiple systems.
I've generally found Nagios to be very good for service
The last couple posts have reflected my experience as well. I use Nagios for
monitoring and alerting. I use Munin for graphing and visual representation
of things.
I'm currently upgrading from Nagios 2 to Nagios 3 and I admit I was kinda
hoping that I'd see more features in Nagios that would
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 14:30 -0400, Chip Marshall wrote:
On August 21, 2009, Tom Buskey sent me the following:
Personally, I'd take a well tuned Nagios for alerts and
something else for tracking historical data on graphs. I use
swatch with multitail to watch logfiles on multiple systems.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Chip Marshall c...@2bithacker.net wrote:
OpenNMS looks interesting to me, I think I'll have to try it out
sometime when I get spare cycles...
There is significant overhead in the initial OpenNMS setup, not unlike HP
Open view, but not quite as bad because
Hi All,
We are currently using Nagios for monitoring systems and some network gear.
However, we have found that it is a little lacking in a few areas:
Predictive threshold
SFlow tracking
Monitoring several sites from a single data collector.
Does anyone have any experience with network/system
just needed an excuse to pull a book off the shelf. Let me know if
the book is likely to be useful.)
Does anyone have any experience with network/system monitors that
combine the functionality of Nagios, Cacti, SFlow, etc.? We are
looking into products from Solar Winds and ManageEngines right
that it is a little lacking in a few
areas:
Predictive threshold
SFlow tracking
Monitoring several sites from a single data collector.
Does anyone have any experience with network/system monitors that
combine the functionality of Nagios, Cacti, SFlow, etc.? We are
looking into products from Solar
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Lloyd Kvam pyt...@venix.com wrote:
http://www.intermapper.com
is a local product that is worth considering.
I looked at Internapper years ago when I was running a Wireless ISP and it
looks very nice at the time. Still, I also suggest you take a hard look at
12 matches
Mail list logo
